Suppr超能文献

跨国政府合作独立评估 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测方法

A Trans-Governmental Collaboration to Independently Evaluate SARS-CoV-2 Serology Assays.

机构信息

Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Researchgrid.418021.e, Frederick, Maryland, USA.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0156421. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01564-21. Epub 2022 Jan 12.

Abstract

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 created a crucial need for serology assays to detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, which led to many serology assays entering the market. A trans-government collaboration was created in April 2020 to independently evaluate the performance of commercial SARS-CoV-2 serology assays and help inform U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory decisions. To assess assay performance, three evaluation panels with similar antibody titer distributions were assembled. Each panel consisted of 110 samples with positive ( = 30) serum samples with a wide range of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers and negative ( = 80) plasma and/or serum samples that were collected before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Each sample was characterized for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies against the spike protein using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Samples were selected for the panel when there was agreement on seropositivity by laboratories at National Cancer Institute's Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI-FNLCR) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The sensitivity and specificity of each assay were assessed to determine Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) suitability. As of January 8, 2021, results from 91 evaluations were made publicly available (https://open.fda.gov/apis/device/covid19serology/, and https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/serology-surveillance/serology-test-evaluation.html). Sensitivity ranged from 27% to 100% for IgG ( = 81), from 10% to 100% for IgM ( = 74), and from 73% to 100% for total or pan-immunoglobulins ( = 5). The combined specificity ranged from 58% to 100% ( = 91). Approximately one-third ( = 27) of the assays evaluated are now authorized by FDA for emergency use. This collaboration established a framework for assay performance evaluation that could be used for future outbreaks and could serve as a model for other technologies. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic created a crucial need for accurate serology assays to evaluate seroprevalence and antiviral immune responses. The initial flood of serology assays entering the market with inadequate performance emphasized the need for independent evaluation of commercial SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays using performance evaluation panels to determine suitability for use under EUA. Through a government-wide collaborative network, 91 commercial SARS-CoV-2 serology assay evaluations were performed. Three evaluation panels with similar overall antibody titer distributions were assembled to evaluate performance. Nearly one-third of the assays evaluated met acceptable performance recommendations, and two assays had EUAs revoked and were removed from the U.S. market based on inadequate performance. Data for all serology assays evaluated are available at the FDA and CDC websites (https://open.fda.gov/apis/device/covid19serology/, and https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/serology-surveillance/serology-test-evaluation.html).

摘要

SARS-CoV-2 的出现催生了对血清学检测方法的迫切需求,用于检测抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体,从而使许多血清学检测方法进入市场。2020 年 4 月,成立了一个跨政府合作机构,以独立评估商业 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测方法的性能,并为美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的监管决策提供信息。为了评估检测方法的性能,成立了三个具有相似抗体效价分布的评估小组。每个小组由 110 个样本组成,其中 30 个为阳性血清样本,具有广泛的抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体效价,80 个为阴性血浆和/或血清样本,这些样本均采集于 COVID-19 大流行之前。使用酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)对每个样本针对刺突蛋白的抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体进行了特征分析。当国立癌症研究所弗雷德里克国家癌症研究实验室(NCI-FNLCR)和疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的实验室对血清阳性达成一致意见时,就会选择样本纳入该小组。评估了每种检测方法的灵敏度和特异性,以确定紧急使用授权(EUA)的适用性。截至 2021 年 1 月 8 日,已有 91 项评估结果公开(https://open.fda.gov/apis/device/covid19serology/,和 https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/serology-surveillance/serology-test-evaluation.html)。对于 IgG( = 81),灵敏度范围为 27%至 100%;对于 IgM( = 74),灵敏度范围为 10%至 100%;对于总或全免疫球蛋白( = 5),灵敏度范围为 73%至 100%。总体特异性范围为 58%至 100%( = 91)。目前约有三分之一( = 27)的评估检测方法已获得 FDA 的紧急使用授权。该合作建立了检测方法性能评估框架,可用于未来的疫情爆发,并可作为其他技术的模型。SARS-CoV-2 大流行催生了对评估血清流行率和抗病毒免疫反应的准确血清学检测方法的迫切需求。最初大量进入市场但性能不足的血清学检测方法强调了需要使用性能评估小组对商业 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测方法进行独立评估,以确定在 EUA 下使用的适用性。通过一个全政府范围的合作网络,进行了 91 项商业 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测方法评估。成立了三个具有相似总体抗体效价分布的评估小组,以评估性能。近三分之一评估的检测方法符合可接受的性能建议,有两种检测方法因性能不足而被撤销 EUA,并从美国市场撤出。所有评估的血清学检测方法的数据都可以在 FDA 和 CDC 的网站上获得(https://open.fda.gov/apis/device/covid19serology/,和 https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/serology-surveillance/serology-test-evaluation.html)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc7/8754108/874626c8920f/spectrum.01564-21-f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验