• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨国政府合作独立评估 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测方法

A Trans-Governmental Collaboration to Independently Evaluate SARS-CoV-2 Serology Assays.

机构信息

Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Researchgrid.418021.e, Frederick, Maryland, USA.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0156421. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01564-21. Epub 2022 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1128/spectrum.01564-21
PMID:35019677
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8754108/
Abstract

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 created a crucial need for serology assays to detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, which led to many serology assays entering the market. A trans-government collaboration was created in April 2020 to independently evaluate the performance of commercial SARS-CoV-2 serology assays and help inform U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory decisions. To assess assay performance, three evaluation panels with similar antibody titer distributions were assembled. Each panel consisted of 110 samples with positive ( = 30) serum samples with a wide range of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers and negative ( = 80) plasma and/or serum samples that were collected before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Each sample was characterized for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies against the spike protein using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Samples were selected for the panel when there was agreement on seropositivity by laboratories at National Cancer Institute's Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (NCI-FNLCR) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The sensitivity and specificity of each assay were assessed to determine Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) suitability. As of January 8, 2021, results from 91 evaluations were made publicly available (https://open.fda.gov/apis/device/covid19serology/, and https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/serology-surveillance/serology-test-evaluation.html). Sensitivity ranged from 27% to 100% for IgG ( = 81), from 10% to 100% for IgM ( = 74), and from 73% to 100% for total or pan-immunoglobulins ( = 5). The combined specificity ranged from 58% to 100% ( = 91). Approximately one-third ( = 27) of the assays evaluated are now authorized by FDA for emergency use. This collaboration established a framework for assay performance evaluation that could be used for future outbreaks and could serve as a model for other technologies. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic created a crucial need for accurate serology assays to evaluate seroprevalence and antiviral immune responses. The initial flood of serology assays entering the market with inadequate performance emphasized the need for independent evaluation of commercial SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays using performance evaluation panels to determine suitability for use under EUA. Through a government-wide collaborative network, 91 commercial SARS-CoV-2 serology assay evaluations were performed. Three evaluation panels with similar overall antibody titer distributions were assembled to evaluate performance. Nearly one-third of the assays evaluated met acceptable performance recommendations, and two assays had EUAs revoked and were removed from the U.S. market based on inadequate performance. Data for all serology assays evaluated are available at the FDA and CDC websites (https://open.fda.gov/apis/device/covid19serology/, and https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/serology-surveillance/serology-test-evaluation.html).

摘要

SARS-CoV-2 的出现催生了对血清学检测方法的迫切需求,用于检测抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体,从而使许多血清学检测方法进入市场。2020 年 4 月,成立了一个跨政府合作机构,以独立评估商业 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测方法的性能,并为美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的监管决策提供信息。为了评估检测方法的性能,成立了三个具有相似抗体效价分布的评估小组。每个小组由 110 个样本组成,其中 30 个为阳性血清样本,具有广泛的抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体效价,80 个为阴性血浆和/或血清样本,这些样本均采集于 COVID-19 大流行之前。使用酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)对每个样本针对刺突蛋白的抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体进行了特征分析。当国立癌症研究所弗雷德里克国家癌症研究实验室(NCI-FNLCR)和疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的实验室对血清阳性达成一致意见时,就会选择样本纳入该小组。评估了每种检测方法的灵敏度和特异性,以确定紧急使用授权(EUA)的适用性。截至 2021 年 1 月 8 日,已有 91 项评估结果公开(https://open.fda.gov/apis/device/covid19serology/,和 https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/serology-surveillance/serology-test-evaluation.html)。对于 IgG( = 81),灵敏度范围为 27%至 100%;对于 IgM( = 74),灵敏度范围为 10%至 100%;对于总或全免疫球蛋白( = 5),灵敏度范围为 73%至 100%。总体特异性范围为 58%至 100%( = 91)。目前约有三分之一( = 27)的评估检测方法已获得 FDA 的紧急使用授权。该合作建立了检测方法性能评估框架,可用于未来的疫情爆发,并可作为其他技术的模型。SARS-CoV-2 大流行催生了对评估血清流行率和抗病毒免疫反应的准确血清学检测方法的迫切需求。最初大量进入市场但性能不足的血清学检测方法强调了需要使用性能评估小组对商业 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测方法进行独立评估,以确定在 EUA 下使用的适用性。通过一个全政府范围的合作网络,进行了 91 项商业 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测方法评估。成立了三个具有相似总体抗体效价分布的评估小组,以评估性能。近三分之一评估的检测方法符合可接受的性能建议,有两种检测方法因性能不足而被撤销 EUA,并从美国市场撤出。所有评估的血清学检测方法的数据都可以在 FDA 和 CDC 的网站上获得(https://open.fda.gov/apis/device/covid19serology/,和 https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/serology-surveillance/serology-test-evaluation.html)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc7/8754108/8c99ceb59ecf/spectrum.01564-21-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc7/8754108/874626c8920f/spectrum.01564-21-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc7/8754108/c9c941bb1e14/spectrum.01564-21-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc7/8754108/8c99ceb59ecf/spectrum.01564-21-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc7/8754108/874626c8920f/spectrum.01564-21-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc7/8754108/c9c941bb1e14/spectrum.01564-21-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc7/8754108/8c99ceb59ecf/spectrum.01564-21-f003.jpg

相似文献

1
A Trans-Governmental Collaboration to Independently Evaluate SARS-CoV-2 Serology Assays.跨国政府合作独立评估 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测方法
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0156421. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01564-21. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
2
Evaluation of a Surrogate Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay-Based Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) cPass Neutralization Antibody Detection Assay and Correlation With Immunoglobulin G Commercial Serology Assays.基于替代酶联免疫吸附试验的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)cPass 中和抗体检测分析的评估及其与免疫球蛋白 G 商业血清学分析的相关性。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 Oct 1;145(10):1212-1220. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0213-SA.
3
Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 Capture IgM Antibody Assay in Convalescent Sera.评估 SARS-CoV-2 捕获 IgM 抗体检测试剂盒在恢复期血清中的应用。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0045821. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00458-21. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
4
Single-Dilution COVID-19 Antibody Test with Qualitative and Quantitative Readouts.单稀释 COVID-19 抗体检测,具有定性和定量读数。
mSphere. 2021 Apr 21;6(2):e00224-21. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00224-21.
5
Validation of Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassays in a Nigerian Population.在尼日利亚人群中验证商业 SARS-CoV-2 免疫测定。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0068021. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00680-21. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
6
SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Health Care Workers: A Comparison of the Clinical Performance of Three Commercially Available Antibody Assays.SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测在医护人员中的应用:三种市售抗体检测试剂盒的临床性能比较。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0039121. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00391-21. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
7
Evaluation of spike protein antigens for SARS-CoV-2 serology.评估 SARS-CoV-2 血清学中的刺突蛋白抗原。
J Virol Methods. 2021 Oct;296:114222. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114222. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
8
Inference of SARS-CoV-2 spike-binding neutralizing antibody titers in sera from hospitalized COVID-19 patients by using commercial enzyme and chemiluminescent immunoassays.使用商业酶联免疫吸附试验和化学发光免疫分析方法推断住院 COVID-19 患者血清中 SARS-CoV-2 刺突结合中和抗体效价。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;40(3):485-494. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-04128-8. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
9
Serological Assays for Assessing Postvaccination SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Response.用于评估接种后 SARS-CoV-2 抗体反应的血清学检测方法。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0073321. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00733-21. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
10
Efficient Identification of High-Titer Anti-Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Antibody Plasma Samples by Pooling Method.高效鉴定高滴度抗严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)抗体血浆样本的汇集法。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 Oct 1;145(10):1221-1227. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0215-SA.

引用本文的文献

1
Analytical measuring interval, linearity, and precision of serology assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies according to CLSI guidelines.根据 CLSI 指南,分析测量区间、血清学检测方法的线性度和精密度与 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测。
mSphere. 2024 Nov 21;9(11):e0039324. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00393-24. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
2
The importance of using WHO International Standards to harmonise SARS-CoV-2 serological assays.使用世界卫生组织国际标准使 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测方法协调一致的重要性。
Lancet Microbe. 2024 Mar;5(3):e301-e305. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00258-6. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
3
Comprehensive, comparative evaluation of 25 automated SARS-CoV-2 serology assays.
25 种自动化 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测方法的全面、比较评估。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jan 11;12(1):e0322823. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03228-23. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
4
SARS-CoV-2 IgG Spike antibody levels and avidity in natural infection or following vaccination with mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 vaccines.SARS-CoV-2 IgG 刺突抗体水平和亲和力在自然感染或接种 mRNA-1273 或 BNT162b2 疫苗后。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Aug 1;19(2):2215677. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2215677. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
5
Assay Harmonization Study To Measure Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Vaccines: a Serology Methods Study.用于测量 SARS-CoV-2 感染和疫苗免疫反应的检测方法协调研究:血清学方法研究。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0535322. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.05353-22. Epub 2023 May 16.
6
Selection, Characterization, Calibration, and Distribution of the U.S. Serology Standard for Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Detection.抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测美国血清学标准的选择、鉴定、校准和分发。
J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Nov 16;60(11):e0099522. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00995-22. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
7
Concordance of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Results during a Period of Low Prevalence.SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测在低流行期的一致性。
mSphere. 2022 Oct 26;7(5):e0025722. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00257-22. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
8
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody quantitative titer reporting using the World Health Organization International Standard Units by four commercial assays.四种商业检测试剂盒使用世界卫生组织国际标准单位报告 SARS-CoV-2 刺突抗体定量滴度的比较。
J Clin Virol. 2022 Nov;156:105292. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105292. Epub 2022 Sep 6.