• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据 CLSI 指南,分析测量区间、血清学检测方法的线性度和精密度与 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测。

Analytical measuring interval, linearity, and precision of serology assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies according to CLSI guidelines.

机构信息

Vaccine, Immunity, and Cancer Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

mSphere. 2024 Nov 21;9(11):e0039324. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00393-24. Epub 2024 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1128/msphere.00393-24
PMID:39480103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11580426/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Serology testing is commonly used to evaluate the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines and measure antibodies as a marker of previous infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In this study, four laboratory-developed serology enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (SARS-CoV-2 anti-Spike and anti-Nucleocapsid immunoglobin G [IgG] and immunoglobin M [IgM]) calibrated to the WHO International Standard 20/136 were validated via analytical measuring interval (limit of blank [LOB], limit of detection [LOD], and limit of quantification [LOQ]), linearity, and precision according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines EP17-A2, EP06 2nd Edition, and EP05-A3. For Spike IgG, LOB was 3.0 binding antibody units per milliliter (BAU/mL), LOD was 4.1 BAU/mL, and LOQ was 27.1 BAU/mL. For Nucleocapsid IgG, LOB was 1.9 BAU/mL, LOD was 3.2 BAU/mL, and LOQ was 24.6 BAU/mL. For Spike IgM, LOB was 57.1 BAU/mL, LOD was 69.0 BAU/mL, and LOQ was 113.5 BAU/mL. For Nucleocapsid IgM, LOD was 242.2 BAU/mL, LOD was 289.9 BAU/mL, and LOQ was 572.4 BAU/mL. Each assay displayed good linearity (max % deviation from linearity (≥LOQ) = 10.7%). The result of within-run repeatability evaluation for medium positive samples was 7.7% for Spike IgG, 4.6% for Nucleocapsid IgG, 7.5% for Spike IgM, and 10.1% for Nucleocapsid IgM. The total precision, including medium positive sample variability across 20 days, three reagent kits, and two operators, was 13.5% for Spike IgG, 14.5% for Nucleocapsid IgG, 17.6% for Spike IgM, and 16.2% for Nucleocapsid IgM. The assays were successfully validated following the applicable CLSI guidelines. All assays met the ±20% deviation from linearity and the ±20% coefficient of variation specification for precision and repeatability.

IMPORTANCE

Reliable and validated serology assays are of increasing importance as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus continues to evolve and cause outbreaks. Validation of serology assays along with calibration to the International and National Standards (such as anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoglobulin WHO International Standard 20/136 or Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research's National Serology Standard COVID-NS01097) is critical to ensuring that results from clinical studies are reliable and comparable among various assays and laboratories. We describe the design and execution of a comprehensive study that established the analytical measuring intervals, linearity, precision, and repeatability of four in-house developed serology enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (SARS-CoV-2 anti-Spike immunoglobin G [IgG] and immunoglobin M [IgM] and anti-Nucleocapsid IgG and IgM) following applicable Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Overall, this study provides practical guidance on experimental design strategies and data analysis techniques, pertaining to the validation of COVID-19 serology assays according to CLSI guidelines, for use in clinical research studies.

摘要

本研究中,我们对四种实验室开发的酶联免疫吸附测定法(SARS-CoV-2 抗刺突和抗核衣壳免疫球蛋白 G [IgG]和免疫球蛋白 M [IgM])进行了验证,这些方法均经过校准,符合世界卫生组织国际标准 20/136,并根据临床和实验室标准化协会(CLSI)指南 EP17-A2、EP06 第二版和 EP05-A3 进行了分析测量区间(空白限 [LOB]、检测限 [LOD] 和定量限 [LOQ])、线性度和精密度验证。对于 Spike IgG,LOB 为 3.0 个结合抗体单位/毫升(BAU/mL),LOD 为 4.1 BAU/mL,LOQ 为 27.1 BAU/mL。对于 Nucleocapsid IgG,LOB 为 1.9 BAU/mL,LOD 为 3.2 BAU/mL,LOQ 为 24.6 BAU/mL。对于 Spike IgM,LOB 为 57.1 BAU/mL,LOD 为 69.0 BAU/mL,LOQ 为 113.5 BAU/mL。对于 Nucleocapsid IgM,LOD 为 242.2 BAU/mL,LOD 为 289.9 BAU/mL,LOQ 为 572.4 BAU/mL。每个检测都显示出良好的线性度(≥LOQ 时最大 %偏离线性度(≥LOQ)为 10.7%)。在对中阳性样本进行重复性评估时, Spike IgG 的日内重复性为 7.7%,Nucleocapsid IgG 为 4.6%,Spike IgM 为 7.5%,Nucleocapsid IgM 为 10.1%。包括 20 天、三个试剂试剂盒和两个操作人员在内的总精密度,Spike IgG 为 13.5%,Nucleocapsid IgG 为 14.5%,Spike IgM 为 17.6%,Nucleocapsid IgM 为 16.2%。所有检测均按照适用的 CLSI 指南成功验证。所有检测均符合线性度偏差±20%和精密度及重复性变异系数±20%的规格。

重要意义

随着严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)病毒不断演变并引发疫情,可靠且经过验证的血清学检测变得越来越重要。对血清学检测进行验证,并与国际和国家标准(如抗 SARS-CoV-2 免疫球蛋白世界卫生组织国际标准 20/136 或弗雷德里克国家癌症研究实验室国家血清学标准 COVID-NS01097)进行校准,对于确保临床研究中的结果可靠且在各种检测和实验室之间具有可比性至关重要。我们描述了一项综合研究的设计和实施情况,该研究根据适用的临床和实验室标准化协会(CLSI)指南,确定了四种内部开发的血清学酶联免疫吸附测定法(SARS-CoV-2 抗刺突免疫球蛋白 G [IgG]和免疫球蛋白 M [IgM]以及抗核衣壳 IgG 和 IgM)的分析测量区间、线性度、精密度和重复性。总体而言,本研究为根据 CLSI 指南验证 COVID-19 血清学检测提供了实用的实验设计策略和数据分析技术方面的指导,可用于临床研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19a8/11580426/dd9534eeb677/msphere.00393-24.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19a8/11580426/aa1764893cd6/msphere.00393-24.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19a8/11580426/a140a08e73e5/msphere.00393-24.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19a8/11580426/dd9534eeb677/msphere.00393-24.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19a8/11580426/aa1764893cd6/msphere.00393-24.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19a8/11580426/a140a08e73e5/msphere.00393-24.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19a8/11580426/dd9534eeb677/msphere.00393-24.f003.jpg

相似文献

1
Analytical measuring interval, linearity, and precision of serology assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies according to CLSI guidelines.根据 CLSI 指南,分析测量区间、血清学检测方法的线性度和精密度与 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测。
mSphere. 2024 Nov 21;9(11):e0039324. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00393-24. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
2
Validation of a new automated chemiluminescent anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibody assay system detecting both N and S proteins in Japan.日本一种新型自动化化学发光抗SARS-CoV-2 IgM和IgG抗体检测系统的验证,该系统可同时检测N蛋白和S蛋白。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0247711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247711. eCollection 2021.
3
Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 Capture IgM Antibody Assay in Convalescent Sera.评估 SARS-CoV-2 捕获 IgM 抗体检测试剂盒在恢复期血清中的应用。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0045821. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00458-21. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
4
Selection, Characterization, Calibration, and Distribution of the U.S. Serology Standard for Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Detection.抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测美国血清学标准的选择、鉴定、校准和分发。
J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Nov 16;60(11):e0099522. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00995-22. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
5
A Highly Sensitive and Specific SARS-CoV-2 Spike- and Nucleoprotein-Based Fluorescent Multiplex Immunoassay (FMIA) to Measure IgG, IgA, and IgM Class Antibodies.一种高灵敏度和特异性的基于 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白和核蛋白的荧光多重免疫分析(FMIA),用于测量 IgG、IgA 和 IgM 类抗体。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0113121. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.01131-21. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
6
A Trans-Governmental Collaboration to Independently Evaluate SARS-CoV-2 Serology Assays.跨国政府合作独立评估 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测方法
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0156421. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01564-21. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
7
Evaluation of serum IgM and IgG antibodies in COVID-19 patients by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.酶联免疫吸附试验评价 COVID-19 患者血清 IgM 和 IgG 抗体。
J Med Virol. 2021 May;93(5):2857-2866. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26741. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
8
SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Health Care Workers: A Comparison of the Clinical Performance of Three Commercially Available Antibody Assays.SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测在医护人员中的应用:三种市售抗体检测试剂盒的临床性能比较。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0039121. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00391-21. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
9
Performance of nucleocapsid and spike-based SARS-CoV-2 serologic assays.基于核衣壳蛋白和刺突蛋白的 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测方法的性能。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 2;15(11):e0237828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237828. eCollection 2020.
10
Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 Serology in Children With Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS-C).儿童多系统炎症综合征(MIS-C)中 SARS-CoV-2 血清学的定量分析。
Pediatrics. 2020 Dec;146(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-018242. Epub 2020 Sep 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Longitudinal Assessment of BNT162b2- and mRNA-1273-Induced Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgG Levels and Avidity Following Three Doses of Vaccination.三剂疫苗接种后BNT162b2和mRNA-1273诱导的抗SARS-CoV-2刺突IgG水平及亲和力的纵向评估
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 May 9;12(5):516. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12050516.
2
Using a multiplex serological assay to estimate time since SARS-CoV-2 infection and past clinical presentation in malagasy patients.使用多重血清学检测方法评估马达加斯加患者感染新冠病毒后的时间及既往临床表现。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun;9(6):e17264. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17264. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
3
SARS-CoV-2 IgG Spike antibody levels and avidity in natural infection or following vaccination with mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 vaccines.
SARS-CoV-2 IgG 刺突抗体水平和亲和力在自然感染或接种 mRNA-1273 或 BNT162b2 疫苗后。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Aug 1;19(2):2215677. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2215677. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
4
MultiSero: An Open-Source Multiplex-ELISA Platform for Measuring Antibody Responses to Infection.MultiSero:一种用于测量感染抗体反应的开源多重酶联免疫吸附测定平台。
Pathogens. 2023 May 2;12(5):671. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12050671.
5
Assay Harmonization Study To Measure Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Vaccines: a Serology Methods Study.用于测量 SARS-CoV-2 感染和疫苗免疫反应的检测方法协调研究:血清学方法研究。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0535322. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.05353-22. Epub 2023 May 16.
6
SARS-CoV-2 infection and immune responses.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型感染与免疫反应。
AIMS Microbiol. 2023 Mar 29;9(2):245-276. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023015. eCollection 2023.
7
COVID-19 in early 2023: Structure, replication mechanism, variants of SARS-CoV-2, diagnostic tests, and vaccine & drug development studies.2023年初的新型冠状病毒肺炎:严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的结构、复制机制、变体、诊断测试以及疫苗与药物研发研究
MedComm (2020). 2023 Apr 8;4(2):e228. doi: 10.1002/mco2.228. eCollection 2023 Apr.
8
Performance estimation of two in-house ELISA assays for COVID-19 surveillance through the combined detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA, IgM, and IgG immunoglobulin isotypes.通过联合检测抗 SARS-CoV-2 IgA、IgM 和 IgG 免疫球蛋白亚型对两种用于 COVID-19 监测的内部 ELISA 检测方法进行性能评估。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 6;18(2):e0270388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270388. eCollection 2023.
9
Broadly neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and other human coronaviruses.广谱中和抗体对 SARS-CoV-2 和其他人类冠状病毒。
Nat Rev Immunol. 2023 Mar;23(3):189-199. doi: 10.1038/s41577-022-00784-3. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
10
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody quantitative titer reporting using the World Health Organization International Standard Units by four commercial assays.四种商业检测试剂盒使用世界卫生组织国际标准单位报告 SARS-CoV-2 刺突抗体定量滴度的比较。
J Clin Virol. 2022 Nov;156:105292. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105292. Epub 2022 Sep 6.