Warwick Medical School, Medical School Building, Coventry, CV4 7HL, UK.
Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Feb;33(2):225-253. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03198-4. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
To systematically review the effect of PRP on healing (vascularization, inflammation and ligamentization) and clinical outcomes (pain, knee function and stability) in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction and compare the preparation and application of PRP.
Independent systematic searches of online databases (Medline, Embase and Web of Science) were conducted following PRISMA guidelines (final search 10th July 2021). Studies were screened against inclusion criteria and risk of bias assessed using Critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) Randomised controlled trial (RCT) checklist. Independent data extraction preceded narrative analysis.
13 RCTs were included. The methods of PRP collection and application were varied. Significant early increases in rate of ligamentization and vascularisation were observed alongside early decreases in inflammation. No significant results were achieved in the later stages of the healing process. Significantly improved pain and knee function was found but no consensus reached.
PRP influences healing through early vascularisation, culminating in higher rates of ligamentization. Long-term effects were not demonstrated suggesting the influence of PRP is limited. No consensus was reached on the impact of PRP on pain, knee stability and resultant knee function, providing avenues for further research. Subsequent investigations could incorporate multiple doses over time, more frequent observation and comparisons of different forms of PRP. The lack of standardisation of PRP collection and application techniques makes comparison difficult. Due to considerable heterogeneity, (I > 50%), a formal meta-analysis was not possible highlighting the need for further high quality RCTs to assess the effectiveness of PRP. The biasing towards young males highlights the need for a more diverse range of participants to make the study more applicable to the general population.
CRD42021242078CRD, 15th March 2021, retrospectively registered.
系统回顾富血小板血浆(PRP)对前交叉韧带重建患者愈合(血管生成、炎症和韧带化)和临床结果(疼痛、膝关节功能和稳定性)的影响,并比较 PRP 的制备和应用。
根据 PRISMA 指南(最终搜索日期为 2021 年 7 月 10 日),对在线数据库(Medline、Embase 和 Web of Science)进行独立的系统检索。使用批判性评估技巧项目(CASP)随机对照试验(RCT)检查表对研究进行筛选,并评估偏倚风险。在进行叙述性分析之前,先进行独立的数据提取。
共纳入 13 项 RCT。PRP 的采集和应用方法多种多样。观察到早期韧带化和血管生成率显著增加,同时炎症早期减少。在愈合过程的后期阶段未取得显著结果。发现疼痛和膝关节功能显著改善,但未达成共识。
PRP 通过早期血管生成影响愈合,最终导致更高的韧带化率。长期效果不明显,表明 PRP 的影响有限。PRP 对疼痛、膝关节稳定性和膝关节功能的影响未达成共识,为进一步研究提供了途径。后续研究可以随时间多次给予不同剂量,更频繁地观察并比较不同形式的 PRP。PRP 采集和应用技术缺乏标准化,使得比较困难。由于存在较大的异质性(I>50%),无法进行正式的荟萃分析,这突出表明需要更多高质量的 RCT 来评估 PRP 的有效性。偏向于年轻男性的研究对象突显了需要更广泛的参与者范围,以使研究更适用于一般人群。
CRD42021242078CRD,2021 年 3 月 15 日,回顾性注册。