School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Center for Integrative Bioinformatics Vienna, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Syst Biol. 2022 Oct 12;71(6):1541-1548. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syac003.
The use of information criteria to distinguish between phylogenetic models has become ubiquitous within the field. However, the variety and complexity of available models are much greater now than when these practices were established. The literature shows an increasing trajectory of healthy skepticism with regard to the use of information theory-based model selection within phylogenetics. We add to this by analyzing the specific case of comparison between partition and mixture models. We argue from a theoretical basis that information criteria are inherently more likely to favor partition models over mixture models, and we then demonstrate this through simulation. Based on our findings, we suggest that partition and mixture models are not suitable for information-theory based model comparison. [AIC, BIC; information criteria; maximum likelihood; mixture models; partitioned model; phylogenetics.].
在该领域,使用信息准则来区分系统发育模型已经变得无处不在。然而,现在可用模型的多样性和复杂性比这些实践建立时要大得多。文献表明,对于系统发育学中基于信息理论的模型选择的使用,人们越来越怀疑。我们通过分析分区和混合模型之间的比较的具体案例来对此进行补充。我们从理论基础出发,认为信息准则本质上更容易偏向于分区模型而不是混合模型,然后通过模拟来证明这一点。基于我们的发现,我们建议分区和混合模型不适合基于信息理论的模型比较。[AIC,BIC;信息准则;最大似然;混合模型;分区模型;系统发育学。]