Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil.
Cad Saude Publica. 2022 Jan 12;38(1):e00180420. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00180420. eCollection 2022.
Correctly recognizing gender identity in population-based surveys is essential to develop effective public health strategies to improve the living conditions of transgender and gender-diverse populations, as well as to adequately collect data on cisgender individuals. This study aims to present the two-step measure as the best strategy for assessing gender identity in Brazilian surveys, thus we performed two separate analyses. Firstly, we conducted a systematic review concerning HIV-related care among Brazilian transgender and gender-diverse populations to assess the strategy used to identify participants' gender identity. Secondly, we re-analyzed data from a recent survey that included Brazilian transgender populations, comparing characteristics and health outcomes from the sample identified by single-item and by the two-step measure. Concerning the systematic review, from 6,585 references, Brazilian research teams published seven articles, and only one study used the two-step measure. Regarding this survey, the two-step measure recognized 567 cisgender and 773 transgender and gender diverse participants among the 1,340 participants who answered the questionnaire, whereas the single-item measure was able to recognize only 540 transgender and gender diverse people. Furthermore, 31 transgender women self-identified as "transgender men" on the single-item measure. Therefore, although scarcely used in Brazil, the two-step measure is a more accurate strategy to recognize gender identity.
正确识别人口普查中的性别认同对于制定有效的公共卫生策略以改善跨性别和性别多样化人群的生活条件以及充分收集顺性别个体的数据至关重要。本研究旨在提出两步措施作为评估巴西调查中性别认同的最佳策略,因此我们进行了两项单独的分析。首先,我们进行了一项系统评价,涉及巴西跨性别和性别多样化人群中的艾滋病毒相关护理,以评估用于确定参与者性别认同的策略。其次,我们重新分析了最近一项包含巴西跨性别群体的调查数据,比较了通过单项措施和两步措施识别的样本的特征和健康结果。关于系统评价,从 6585 条参考文献中,巴西研究团队发表了 7 篇文章,只有一项研究使用了两步措施。关于这项调查,两步措施在回答问卷的 1340 名参与者中识别出了 567 名顺性别者和 773 名跨性别和性别多样化者,而单项措施只能识别出 540 名跨性别和性别多样化者。此外,31 名跨性别女性在单项措施中自我认同为“跨性别男性”。因此,尽管两步措施在巴西很少使用,但它是一种更准确的识别性别认同的策略。