• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文版颞下颌关节紊乱诊断标准轴 I 诊断的跨检查者信度。

Inter-examiner reliability of the Chinese version of Axis I diagnoses of the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Cranio. 2024 Sep;42(5):513-518. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2021.2015087. Epub 2022 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1080/08869634.2021.2015087
PMID:35061572
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the inter-examiner reliability of the Chinese version of the Axis I diagnoses of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) and to compare the consistency between clinical diagnoses and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Sixty-seven individuals were evaluated by three TMD specialists, and 49 underwent MRI examination. Cohen's Kappa coefficient (κ) was used to evaluate the inter-examiner reliability and the consistency between clinical diagnoses and MRI manifestations.

RESULTS

Diagnostic agreement was good to excellent for pain and disc displacement with or without reduction (κ = 0.659-1.000). Agreement between clinical diagnoses and MRI findings was fair to good (κ = 0.400).

CONCLUSION

Inter-examiner diagnostic reliability using the Chinese version of the DC/TMD Axis I instruments was excellent, especially for arthrogenic TMDs.

摘要

目的

评估《颞下颌关节紊乱诊断与治疗标准》(DC/TMD)中文版轴Ⅰ诊断的检查者间信度,并比较临床诊断与磁共振成像(MRI)的一致性。

方法

67 名受试者由 3 位 TMD 专家进行评估,其中 49 名接受 MRI 检查。采用 Cohen's Kappa 系数(κ)评估检查者间信度和临床诊断与 MRI 表现的一致性。

结果

疼痛和伴或不伴复位的关节盘移位的诊断一致性为良好到极好(κ=0.659-1.000)。临床诊断与 MRI 结果的一致性为一般到良好(κ=0.400)。

结论

使用中文版 DC/TMD 轴Ⅰ工具进行的检查者间诊断可靠性极好,特别是对关节源性 TMD 而言。

相似文献

1
Inter-examiner reliability of the Chinese version of Axis I diagnoses of the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders.中文版颞下颌关节紊乱诊断标准轴 I 诊断的跨检查者信度。
Cranio. 2024 Sep;42(5):513-518. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2021.2015087. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
2
Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD): interexaminer reliability of the Finnish version of Axis I clinical diagnoses.颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断标准(DC/TMD):芬兰版轴 I 临床诊断的检查者间可靠性。
J Oral Rehabil. 2017 Jul;44(7):493-499. doi: 10.1111/joor.12516. Epub 2017 May 6.
3
The Research Diagnostic Criteria For Temporomandibular Disorders. II: reliability of Axis I diagnoses and selected clinical measures.颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准。II:I轴诊断及选定临床测量指标的可靠性
J Orofac Pain. 2010 Winter;24(1):25-34.
4
Recalibration improves inter-examiner reliability of TMD examination.重新校准可提高颞下颌关节紊乱病检查中检查者之间的可靠性。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2006 Jun;64(3):146-52. doi: 10.1080/00016350500483137.
5
Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group†.颞下颌关节紊乱病(DC/TMD)的诊断标准(临床与研究用):国际 RDC/TMD 联合会*和口腔颌面痛特别兴趣小组†的推荐标准。
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014 Winter;28(1):6-27. doi: 10.11607/jop.1151.
6
Does Temporomandibular Joint Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnosis Support Clinical Examination Diagnosis Following Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders?颞下颌关节磁共振成像诊断是否支持根据颞下颌关节紊乱病的诊断标准进行临床检查诊断?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Jul;81(7):813-819. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2023.03.007. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
7
Interexaminer reliability of the German version of the DC/TMD.德式头痛问卷(DC/TMD)德语版的评估者间信度。
J Oral Rehabil. 2021 Jan;48(1):28-34. doi: 10.1111/joor.13054. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
8
Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Diagnostic accuracy for general dentistry procedure without mandatory commands regarding myalgia, arthralgia and headache attributed to temporomandibular disorder.颞下颌关节紊乱病的诊断标准:针对一般牙科程序的诊断准确性,不包括对颞下颌关节紊乱病所致肌痛、关节痛和头痛的强制指令。
J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Jul;45(7):497-503. doi: 10.1111/joor.12643. Epub 2018 May 18.
9
Comparison of the outcomes of dynamic/static tests and palpation tests in TMD-pain patients.颞下颌关节紊乱病疼痛患者动态/静态测试与触诊测试结果的比较。
J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Mar;45(3):185-190. doi: 10.1111/joor.12600. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
10
Temporomandibular disorders among Brazilian adolescents: reliability and validity of a screening questionnaire.巴西青少年的颞下颌关节紊乱症:一份筛查问卷的信效度
J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Jul-Aug;22(4):314-22. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720130694.

引用本文的文献

1
Brief Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: Sensitivity and Specificity of Clinical Diagnoses (A Multi-Center Study).颞下颌关节紊乱病简易诊断标准:临床诊断的敏感性和特异性(一项多中心研究)
J Oral Rehabil. 2025 Aug;52(8):1251-1258. doi: 10.1111/joor.13969. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
2
Brazilian Portuguese version of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Axis I: Cross-cultural adaptation, criterion validity, and reliability.《颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断标准(DC/TMD)》巴西葡萄牙语版第一轴:跨文化调适、标准效度及信度
Braz J Phys Ther. 2025 Mar-Apr;29(2):101187. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101187. Epub 2025 Mar 8.