Parsons Leigh Jeanna, de Grood Chloe, Brundin-Mather Rebecca, Dodds Alexandra, FitzGerald Emily A, Kemp Laryssa, Mizen Sara J, Whalen-Browne Liam, Stelfox Henry T, Fiest Kirsten M
School of Health Administration, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Jan 18;4(1):e0612. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000612. eCollection 2022 Jan.
We sought to identify and prioritize improvement strategies that Critical Care Medicine (CCM) programs could use to inform and advance gender equity among physicians in CCM.
This study involved three sequential phases: 1) scoping review that identified strategies to improve gender equity in all medical specialties; 2) modified consensus process with 48 CCM stakeholders to rate and rank identified strategies; and 3) in-person stakeholder meeting to refine strategies and discuss facilitators and barriers to their implementation.
CCM.
CCM stakeholders (physicians, researchers, and decision-makers; mutually inclusive).
None.
We identified 190 unique strategies from 416 articles. Strategies were grouped thematically into 20 categories across four overarching pillars of equity: access, participation, reimbursement, and culture. Participants prioritized 22 improvement strategies for implementation in CCM. The top-rated strategy from each pillar included: 1) nominate gender diverse candidates for faculty positions and prestigious opportunities (equitable access); 2) mandate training in unconscious bias and equitable treatment for committee (e.g., hiring, promotion) members (equitable participation); 3) ensure equitable starting salaries regardless of sex or gender (equitable reimbursement); and, 4) conduct 360° evaluations of leaders (including their direct work circle of supervisors, peers, and subordinates) through a diversity lens (equitable culture). Interprofessional collaboration, leadership, and local champions were identified as key enablers for implementation.
We identified stakeholder-prioritized strategies that can be used to inform and enhance gender equity among physicians in CCM under four overarching equity pillars: access, participation, reimbursement, and culture. Implementation approaches should include education, policy creation, and measurement, and reporting.
我们试图确定并优先考虑重症医学(CCM)项目可用于促进CCM领域医生性别平等的改进策略,并排出优先级。
本研究包括三个连续阶段:1)范围审查,确定所有医学专业中改善性别平等的策略;2)与48名CCM利益相关者进行修订后的共识过程,对确定的策略进行评分和排名;3)面对面的利益相关者会议,以完善策略并讨论实施的促进因素和障碍。
CCM。
CCM利益相关者(医生、研究人员和决策者;相互包容)。
无。
我们从416篇文章中确定了190种独特的策略。这些策略按主题分为20类,涵盖公平的四个总体支柱:准入、参与、薪酬和文化。参与者优先考虑了22项改进策略,以便在CCM中实施。每个支柱中排名最高的策略包括:1)提名性别多元化的候选人担任教职和享有声望的机会(公平准入);2)要求委员会(如招聘、晋升)成员接受无意识偏见和公平对待的培训(公平参与);3)确保无论性别如何都有公平的起薪(公平薪酬);4)通过多元化视角对领导者(包括其直接的监督者、同事和下属工作圈)进行360度评估(公平文化)。跨专业协作领导和当地倡导者被确定为实施的关键推动因素。
我们确定了利益相关者优先考虑的策略,可用于在准入、参与、薪酬和文化这四个总体公平支柱下,促进和加强CCM领域医生的性别平等。实施方法应包括教育、政策制定、测量和报告。