Suppr超能文献

识别与评估解决重症医学专业性别不平等问题的策略:一项范围综述、改良共识流程及利益相关者会议

Identification and Assessment of Strategies to Address Gender Inequity in the Specialty of Critical Care Medicine: A Scoping Review, Modified Consensus Process, and Stakeholder Meeting.

作者信息

Parsons Leigh Jeanna, de Grood Chloe, Brundin-Mather Rebecca, Dodds Alexandra, FitzGerald Emily A, Kemp Laryssa, Mizen Sara J, Whalen-Browne Liam, Stelfox Henry T, Fiest Kirsten M

机构信息

School of Health Administration, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Crit Care Explor. 2022 Jan 18;4(1):e0612. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000612. eCollection 2022 Jan.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

We sought to identify and prioritize improvement strategies that Critical Care Medicine (CCM) programs could use to inform and advance gender equity among physicians in CCM.

DESIGN

This study involved three sequential phases: 1) scoping review that identified strategies to improve gender equity in all medical specialties; 2) modified consensus process with 48 CCM stakeholders to rate and rank identified strategies; and 3) in-person stakeholder meeting to refine strategies and discuss facilitators and barriers to their implementation.

SETTING

CCM.

SUBJECTS

CCM stakeholders (physicians, researchers, and decision-makers; mutually inclusive).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We identified 190 unique strategies from 416 articles. Strategies were grouped thematically into 20 categories across four overarching pillars of equity: access, participation, reimbursement, and culture. Participants prioritized 22 improvement strategies for implementation in CCM. The top-rated strategy from each pillar included: 1) nominate gender diverse candidates for faculty positions and prestigious opportunities (equitable access); 2) mandate training in unconscious bias and equitable treatment for committee (e.g., hiring, promotion) members (equitable participation); 3) ensure equitable starting salaries regardless of sex or gender (equitable reimbursement); and, 4) conduct 360° evaluations of leaders (including their direct work circle of supervisors, peers, and subordinates) through a diversity lens (equitable culture). Interprofessional collaboration, leadership, and local champions were identified as key enablers for implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified stakeholder-prioritized strategies that can be used to inform and enhance gender equity among physicians in CCM under four overarching equity pillars: access, participation, reimbursement, and culture. Implementation approaches should include education, policy creation, and measurement, and reporting.

摘要

未标注

我们试图确定并优先考虑重症医学(CCM)项目可用于促进CCM领域医生性别平等的改进策略,并排出优先级。

设计

本研究包括三个连续阶段:1)范围审查,确定所有医学专业中改善性别平等的策略;2)与48名CCM利益相关者进行修订后的共识过程,对确定的策略进行评分和排名;3)面对面的利益相关者会议,以完善策略并讨论实施的促进因素和障碍。

背景

CCM。

研究对象

CCM利益相关者(医生、研究人员和决策者;相互包容)。

干预措施

无。

测量指标和主要结果

我们从416篇文章中确定了190种独特的策略。这些策略按主题分为20类,涵盖公平的四个总体支柱:准入、参与、薪酬和文化。参与者优先考虑了22项改进策略,以便在CCM中实施。每个支柱中排名最高的策略包括:1)提名性别多元化的候选人担任教职和享有声望的机会(公平准入);2)要求委员会(如招聘、晋升)成员接受无意识偏见和公平对待的培训(公平参与);3)确保无论性别如何都有公平的起薪(公平薪酬);4)通过多元化视角对领导者(包括其直接的监督者、同事和下属工作圈)进行360度评估(公平文化)。跨专业协作领导和当地倡导者被确定为实施的关键推动因素。

结论

我们确定了利益相关者优先考虑的策略,可用于在准入、参与、薪酬和文化这四个总体公平支柱下,促进和加强CCM领域医生的性别平等。实施方法应包括教育、政策制定、测量和报告。

相似文献

3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Equity of access to palliative care: a scoping review.公平获得姑息治疗的机会:范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Nov 25;23(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02321-1.

本文引用的文献

2
5
Women Physicians and the COVID-19 Pandemic.女性医生与新冠疫情
JAMA. 2020 Sep 1;324(9):835-836. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.14797.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验