Quan Michele, Cho Nam, Bushell Thomas, Mak Joseph, Nguyen Nolan, Litwak Jane, Rockwood Nicholas, Nguyen H Bryant
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Hyperbaric, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA.
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA.
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Jan 18;4(1):e0623. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000623. eCollection 2022 Jan.
Angiotensin II (ATII) was approved for septic or other distributive shock due to its property of increasing blood pressure within 3 hours. Limited data exist regarding its effectiveness when used in real-world clinical practice.
This study examined ATII as a third-line vasopressor based on institutional approval.
Retrospective observational cohort study.
Medical ICU at an academic tertiary care medical center. Adult patients requiring 3 or more vasopressor agents for septic shock or other forms of distributed shock from September 1, 2018, to January 31, 2020.
Effect of ATII after norepinephrine and vasopressin on mortality and mean arterial blood pressure response after 3 hours of administration.
One-hundred forty-seven patients, 56 receiving ATII and 91 receiving another vasopressor (non-ATII), were enrolled. Patients in the ATII group had higher mortality compared to the non-ATII group, and more required 5 or greater vasopressor agents ( < 0.01). After propensity score weighting, there remains a trend in higher mortality in the ATII compared to non-ATII group, but not statistically significant (86.0% vs 71.0%, = 0.16). More patients in the ATII group continued to require 5 or greater vasopressor agents compared to the non-ATII group after propensity score weighting (45.9% vs 12.5%, < 0.01). SOFA score was the only variable associated with mortality (OR = 1.25, 95% CI, 1.05-1.49; = 0.01). Patients were considered a "responder" if mean arterial pressure greater than 65 mm Hg at 3 hours after the third vasopressor was initiated. Among the ATII group, 37.5% patients were responders compared to 45.1% responders in the non-ATII group (relative risk = 1.07, 95% CI, 0.6-1.93; = 0.81).
Although previous data support the use of ATII due to its favorable hemodynamic response in patients with distributive shock, there was no observed benefit in mortality or hemodynamic response with ATII as a third-line vasopressor in our study of real-world patients.
血管紧张素II(ATII)因其在3小时内升高血压的特性而被批准用于脓毒症或其他分布性休克。关于其在实际临床实践中使用时的有效性的数据有限。
本研究基于机构批准,将ATII作为三线血管升压药进行研究。
回顾性观察队列研究。
一所学术性三级医疗中心的医学重症监护病房。2018年9月1日至2020年1月31日期间,因脓毒症休克或其他形式的分布性休克需要3种或更多血管升压药的成年患者。
去甲肾上腺素和血管加压素后ATII对死亡率的影响以及给药3小时后的平均动脉血压反应。
共纳入147例患者,56例接受ATII治疗,91例接受其他血管升压药(非ATII)治疗。ATII组患者的死亡率高于非ATII组,且更多患者需要5种或更多的血管升压药(P<0.01)。倾向评分加权后,ATII组的死亡率仍高于非ATII组,但无统计学意义(86.0%对71.0%,P=0.16)。倾向评分加权后,与非ATII组相比,ATII组更多患者继续需要5种或更多的血管升压药(45.9%对12.5%,P<0.01)。序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分是与死亡率相关的唯一变量(OR=1.25,95%CI,1.05-1.49;P=0.01)。如果在启动第三种血管升压药后3小时平均动脉压大于65mmHg,则患者被视为“反应者”。在ATII组中,37.5%的患者为反应者相比,非ATII组为45.1%(相对风险=1.07,95%CI,0.6-1.93;P=0.81)。
尽管先前的数据支持使用ATII,因为其在分布性休克患者中具有良好的血流动力学反应,但在我们对实际患者的研究中,未观察到ATII作为三线血管升压药在死亡率或血流动力学反应方面的益处。