Suppr超能文献

使用不同口腔内扫描仪时,扫描体夹板对全牙弓种植体印模准确性的影响:一项体外研究

Effect of splinting scan bodies on trueness of complete-arch implant impression using different intraoral scanners: an in vitro study.

作者信息

Retana Luciano, Nejat Amir H, Pozzi Alessandro

出版信息

Int J Comput Dent. 2023 Feb 24;26(1):19-28. doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b2599297.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the trueness of seven different intraoral scanners (IOSs) in making a complete-arch digital scan with and without splinting the scan bodies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A polyurethane cast of an edentulous mandible with four dental implant analogs was prepared. A reference scan was made using a laboratory scanner. The reference model was scanned with each of the seven investigated IOSs (control groups, n = 10 per scanner), and scanned again after splinting the scan bodies (study groups, n = 10 per scanner). Each scan was exported as a standard tessellation language (STL) file and transferred to a comprehensive metrology software program (Geomagic Control X). In order to measure the trueness, four points (A, B, C, and D) were determined on the scan bodies, and the distance between point A and the other points (DAB, DAC, and DAD) was measured. The measurements were tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and probability plots. Trueness was compared using three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and pairwise comparisons were performed using the post hoc Tukey and paired sample t tests. Statistical analyses were two-sided, and the significance level was set at 5%.

RESULTS

Splinting the scan bodies improved the trueness values of the digital scans, while increasing the interimplant distance decreased them. A significant association was found between the trueness values and all three tested variables, including splinting the scan bodies, type of IOS, and interimplant distance (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Based on the present findings, splinting the scan bodies can improve the trueness of complete-arch digital implant scans due to the improvement in morphologic landmarks by the stitching process, regardless of the type of IOS or the interimplant distance. (Int J Comput Dent 2023;26(1): 19-0; doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b2599297).

摘要

目的

评估七种不同的口腔内扫描仪(IOS)在使用和不使用扫描体夹板进行全牙弓数字扫描时的准确性。

材料与方法

制备了一个带有四个牙种植体模拟物的无牙下颌骨的聚氨酯模型。使用实验室扫描仪进行参考扫描。用七种被研究的IOS分别对参考模型进行扫描(对照组,每个扫描仪n = 10),并在扫描体夹板固定后再次扫描(研究组,每个扫描仪n = 10)。每次扫描均导出为标准镶嵌语言(STL)文件,并传输到一个综合计量软件程序(Geomagic Control X)中。为了测量准确性,在扫描体上确定四个点(A、B、C和D),并测量点A与其他点之间的距离(DAB、DAC和DAD)。使用Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验和概率图对测量结果进行正态性检验。使用三因素方差分析(ANOVA)比较准确性,并使用事后Tukey检验和配对样本t检验进行两两比较。统计分析为双侧检验,显著性水平设定为5%。

结果

使用扫描体夹板可提高数字扫描的准确性值,而增加种植体间距离则会降低准确性值。在准确性值与所有三个测试变量之间发现了显著关联,包括扫描体夹板固定、IOS类型和种植体间距离(P < 0.001)。

结论

基于目前的研究结果,无论IOS类型或种植体间距离如何,通过拼接过程改善形态标志点,扫描体夹板固定可提高全牙弓数字种植扫描的准确性。(《国际计算机牙科学杂志》2023年;26(1): 19 - 0;doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b2599297)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验