• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英格兰每周两次大规模无症状检测的社交媒体反应。

The social media response to twice-weekly mass asymptomatic testing in England.

机构信息

Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, Emergency Response Department, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 27;22(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12605-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-022-12605-2
PMID:35081908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8791807/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

From 9th April 2021, everyone in England has been encouraged to take two COVID-19 tests per week. This is the first time that national mass asymptomatic testing has been introduced in the UK and the effectiveness of the policy depends on uptake with testing and willingness to self-isolate following a positive test result. This paper examines attitudes towards twice-weekly testing, as well as barriers and facilitators to engaging in testing.

METHODS

Between 5th April and 28th May 2021 we searched Twitter, Facebook, and online news articles with publicly available comment sections to identify comments relating to twice-weekly testing. We identified 5783 comments which were then analysed using a framework analysis.

RESULTS

We identified nine main themes. Five themes related to barriers to engaging in testing: low perceived risk from COVID-19; mistrust in the government; concern about taking a test; perceived ineffectiveness of twice-weekly testing policy; and perceived negative impact of twice-weekly testing policy. Four themes related to facilitators to engaging in testing: wanting to protect others; positive perceptions of tests; a desire to return to normal; and perceived efficacy for reducing asymptomatic transmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the comments identified indicated predominately negative attitudes towards the twice weekly testing policy. Several recommendations can be made to improve engagement with twice weekly testing, including: 1) communicate openly and honestly about the purpose of testing; 2) provide information about the accuracy of tests; 3) provide financial support for those required to self-isolate, and; 4) emphasise accessibility of testing.

摘要

背景

自 2021 年 4 月 9 日起,英国鼓励每个人每周进行两次 COVID-19 检测。这是英国首次引入全国性大规模无症状检测,该政策的有效性取决于检测的参与度以及对阳性检测结果进行自我隔离的意愿。本文研究了人们对每周两次检测的态度,以及参与检测的障碍和促进因素。

方法

在 2021 年 4 月 5 日至 5 月 28 日期间,我们在 Twitter、Facebook 和在线新闻文章中搜索了公开评论部分,以识别与每周两次检测相关的评论。我们共识别出 5783 条评论,然后使用框架分析法对其进行分析。

结果

我们确定了九个主要主题。五个主题与参与检测的障碍有关:对 COVID-19 的低感知风险;对政府的不信任;对检测的担忧;对每周两次检测政策的有效性的怀疑;以及对每周两次检测政策的负面影响的感知。四个主题与参与检测的促进因素有关:保护他人的愿望;对检测的积极看法;回归正常的渴望;以及减少无症状传播的功效的感知。

结论

总的来说,这些评论表明对每周两次检测政策的态度主要是负面的。为了提高对每周两次检测的参与度,可以提出以下建议:1)公开诚实地传达检测的目的;2)提供有关检测准确性的信息;3)为需要自我隔离的人提供经济支持;以及 4)强调检测的可及性。

相似文献

1
The social media response to twice-weekly mass asymptomatic testing in England.英格兰每周两次大规模无症状检测的社交媒体反应。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 27;22(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12605-2.
2
Thematic analysis of national online narratives on regular asymptomatic testing for Covid-19 in schools in England.英格兰学校定期对无症状新冠病毒感染者进行检测的国家在线叙事的主题分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 31;23(1):1028. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15991-3.
3
Local Community Response to Mass Asymptomatic COVID-19 Testing in Liverpool, England: Social Media Analysis.英国利物浦当地社区对大规模无症状新冠病毒检测的反应:社交媒体分析
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Aug 4;6(8):e34422. doi: 10.2196/34422.
4
Students' Views towards Sars-Cov-2 Mass Asymptomatic Testing, Social Distancing and Self-Isolation in a University Setting during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.学生对 COVID-19 大流行期间大学环境中 SARS-CoV-2 大规模无症状检测、社交距离和自我隔离的看法:一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 15;18(8):4182. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084182.
5
Measuring the Outreach Efforts of Public Health Authorities and the Public Response on Facebook During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Early 2020: Cross-Country Comparison.2020年初新冠疫情期间公共卫生当局在脸书上的宣传努力及公众反应的衡量:跨国比较
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 19;22(5):e19334. doi: 10.2196/19334.
6
PROTECT Trial: A cluster-randomized study with hydroxychloroquine versus observational support for prevention or early-phase treatment of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.PROTECT 试验:羟氯喹对比观察支持用于预防或 COVID-19 早期治疗的一项集群随机对照研究:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jul 31;21(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04527-4.
7
Examining the Utility of Social Media in COVID-19 Vaccination: Unsupervised Learning of 672,133 Twitter Posts.社交媒体在新冠疫苗接种中的应用研究:对 672,133 条推特帖子的无监督学习。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 3;7(11):e29789. doi: 10.2196/29789.
8
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
9
Shaping care home COVID-19 testing policy: a protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial of asymptomatic testing compared with standard care in care home staff (VIVALDI-CT).制定养老院 COVID-19 检测政策:一项在养老院工作人员中进行无症状检测与标准护理的实用集群随机对照试验方案(VIVALDI-CT)。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 14;13(11):e076210. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076210.
10
ChemoPROphyLaxIs with hydroxychloroquine For covId-19 infeCtious disease (PROLIFIC) to prevent covid-19 infection in frontline healthcare workers: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.羟氯喹用于 COVID-19 传染病的化学预防(PROLIFIC)以预防一线医护人员感染 COVID-19:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jul 2;21(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04543-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision to self-isolate during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a rapid scoping review.英国 COVID-19 大流行期间的自我隔离决策:快速范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 29;14(3):e084437. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084437.
2
Thematic analysis of national online narratives on regular asymptomatic testing for Covid-19 in schools in England.英格兰学校定期对无症状新冠病毒感染者进行检测的国家在线叙事的主题分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 31;23(1):1028. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15991-3.
3
The Experiences of Stakeholders Using Social Media as a Tool for Health Service Design and Quality Improvement: A Scoping Review.利益相关者利用社交媒体作为卫生服务设计和质量改进工具的经验:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 11;19(22):14851. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214851.
4
A Qualitative Evaluation of the Barriers and Enablers for Implementation of an Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Testing Service at the University of Nottingham: A Multi-Site Higher Education Setting in England.在英格兰诺丁汉大学的多校区高等教育环境中,对无症状 SARS-CoV-2 检测服务实施的障碍和促进因素进行定性评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 12;19(20):13140. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013140.
5
Guiding organisational decision-making about COVID-19 asymptomatic testing in workplaces: mixed-method study to inform an ethical framework.指导组织关于工作场所 COVID-19 无症状检测的决策:一项混合方法研究,为伦理框架提供信息。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Sep 15;22(1):1747. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13993-1.
6
The significance of advanced COVID-19 diagnostic testing in pandemic control measures.新冠病毒高级诊断检测在疫情防控措施中的意义。
Int J Biol Sci. 2022 Jul 11;18(12):4610-4617. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.72837. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Local Community Response to Mass Asymptomatic COVID-19 Testing in Liverpool, England: Social Media Analysis.英国利物浦当地社区对大规模无症状新冠病毒检测的反应:社交媒体分析
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Aug 4;6(8):e34422. doi: 10.2196/34422.
2
Perceptions on undertaking regular asymptomatic self-testing for COVID-19 using lateral flow tests: a qualitative study of university students and staff.使用侧向流动检测进行定期无症状自我 COVID-19 检测的看法:对大学生和教职员工的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 2;11(9):e053850. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053850.
3
A systematic review of the sensitivity and specificity of lateral flow devices in the detection of SARS-CoV-2.一种用于检测 SARS-CoV-2 的侧向流动设备的灵敏度和特异性的系统评价。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 18;21(1):828. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06528-3.
4
Students' Views towards Sars-Cov-2 Mass Asymptomatic Testing, Social Distancing and Self-Isolation in a University Setting during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.学生对 COVID-19 大流行期间大学环境中 SARS-CoV-2 大规模无症状检测、社交距离和自我隔离的看法:一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 15;18(8):4182. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084182.
5
Adherence to the test, trace, and isolate system in the UK: results from 37 nationally representative surveys.英国对检测、追踪和隔离系统的遵守情况:37 项全国代表性调查的结果。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 31;372:n608. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n608.
6
Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原和基于分子的检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 24;3(3):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub2.
7
Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries.社会数据:偏见、方法陷阱与伦理边界
Front Big Data. 2019 Jul 11;2:13. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2019.00013. eCollection 2019.
8
The Moderating Effects of Perceived Severity on the Generational Gap in Preventive Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the U.S.美国 COVID-19 大流行期间,感知严重性对代际预防行为差距的调节作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 19;18(4):2011. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042011.
9
Perceived Barriers to COVID-19 Testing.对 COVID-19 检测的认知障碍。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 25;18(5):2278. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052278.
10
Covid-19: Why test and trace will fail without support for self-isolation.新冠疫情:为何没有对自我隔离的支持,检测与追踪将会失效。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 8;372:n327. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n327.