• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后术中及最终病理检查中风险组与切缘阳性的相关性。

The association of a risk group with positive margin in the intraoperative and final pathology examination after robotic radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Kupski Tomasz, Małek Michał, Mor Igal

机构信息

Mazovia Hospital Warsaw, Department of Urology, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(4):491-495. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0031. Epub 2021 Oct 13.

DOI:10.5173/ceju.2021.0031
PMID:35083067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8771131/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of a positive margin in the intraoperative and final pathology depending on the risk group for biochemical recurrence in biopsy specimens after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RaRP) with sparing of the neurovascular bundles (NS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was prospective and non-randomised. The intraoperative and final pathology examinations were performed in 65 consecutive patients treated with RaRP between 11.2019-08.2020. In the intraoperative examination, the site of the dissected neurovascular bundles and any suspicious places were examined. Patients were divided into 3 risk groups [according to the European Association of Urology (EAU) biochemical recurrence-risk stratification]. Due to the uncertain prognostic value of microscopic positive margins, 3 groups were identified: R0, Rmicro and R1.

RESULTS

In the intraoperative examination, the distribution of risk groups in R0, Rmicro and R1 groups is similar (p = 0.132). In the postoperative study, the distribution of risk groups in each margin group is different, and is statistically significant (p <0.001). It has been shown that an increase in the risk group is an indicator of the occurrence of a positive margin in the final histopathological result regardless of the inclusion of Rmicro into R1 or into R0 by 2.68 and 6.52 times, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative risk group is an important factor for the occurrence of a positive margin, but only in the final examination and not in the intraoperative one. An intraoperative examination of the neurovascular bundles only is pointless and should be extended to the examination of the apex.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是评估在保留神经血管束(NS)的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RaRP)后,根据活检标本中生化复发的风险组,术中及最终病理切缘阳性的风险。

材料与方法

本研究为前瞻性非随机研究。对2019年11月至2020年8月期间连续接受RaRP治疗的65例患者进行了术中及最终病理检查。在术中检查中,检查解剖的神经血管束部位及任何可疑部位。患者根据欧洲泌尿外科协会(EAU)生化复发风险分层分为3个风险组。由于显微镜下切缘阳性的预后价值不确定,确定了3组:R0、Rmicro和R1。

结果

在术中检查中,R0、Rmicro和R1组的风险组分布相似(p = 0.132)。在术后研究中,各切缘组的风险组分布不同,且具有统计学意义(p <0.001)。结果表明,无论将Rmicro归入R1还是R0,风险组的增加分别是最终组织病理学结果中切缘阳性发生的指标,增加倍数分别为2.68倍和6.52倍。

结论

术前风险组是切缘阳性发生的重要因素,但仅在最终检查中如此,在术中检查中并非如此。仅对神经血管束进行术中检查毫无意义,应扩展至对前列腺尖部的检查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81c5/8771131/e35ff92b32a0/CEJU-74-0031-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81c5/8771131/c016a9c8c572/CEJU-74-0031-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81c5/8771131/e35ff92b32a0/CEJU-74-0031-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81c5/8771131/c016a9c8c572/CEJU-74-0031-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81c5/8771131/e35ff92b32a0/CEJU-74-0031-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The association of a risk group with positive margin in the intraoperative and final pathology examination after robotic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后术中及最终病理检查中风险组与切缘阳性的相关性。
Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(4):491-495. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0031. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
2
Intraoperative frozen section of the prostate decreases positive margin rate while ensuring nerve sparing procedure during radical prostatectomy.前列腺切除术时行冰冻切片可降低阳性切缘率,同时保证神经保留的根治性前列腺切除术。
J Urol. 2013 Aug;190(2):515-20. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.011. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
3
Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中高危前列腺癌保留神经的安全性
J Robot Surg. 2017 Jun;11(2):129-138. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0627-3. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
4
The Use of Augmented Reality to Guide the Intraoperative Frozen Section During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.增强现实技术在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中引导术中冰冻切片的应用。
Eur Urol. 2021 Oct;80(4):480-488. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.06.020. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
5
Retrograde Release of the Neurovascular Bundle with Preservation of Dorsal Venous Complex During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Optimizing Functional Outcomes.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中保留背静脉复合体的神经血管束逆行释放:优化功能结果。
Eur Urol. 2020 May;77(5):628-635. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
6
Digital Frozen Sections with Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Surgical Technique.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中荧光共聚焦显微镜下的数字冰冻切片:手术技术
Eur Urol. 2021 Dec;80(6):724-729. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.03.021. Epub 2021 May 6.
7
Utility of intraoperative frozen section analysis of surgical margins in region of neurovascular bundles at radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术中神经血管束区域手术切缘的术中冰冻切片分析的效用
Urology. 2002 May;59(5):709-14. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01539-x.
8
Impact of mpMRI targeted biopsy on intraoperative nerve-sparing (NeuroSAFE) during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.磁共振成像引导下靶向活检对机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术术中保留神经(NeuroSAFE)的影响。
Prostate. 2022 Mar;82(4):493-501. doi: 10.1002/pros.24295. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
9
MRI Displays the Prostatic Cancer Anatomy and Improves the Bundles Management Before Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.磁共振成像(MRI)可显示前列腺癌的解剖结构,并改善机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术之前对神经束的处理。
J Endourol. 2018 Apr;32(4):315-321. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0701.
10
A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术中阳性手术切缘的发生率及位置比较。
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.008. Epub 2007 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Re: Kupski T, Małek M, Mor I. The association of a risk group with positive margin in the intraoperative and final pathology examination after robotic radical prostatectomy. Cent European J Urol. 2021; 74: 491-495.回复:库普斯基T、马莱克M、莫尔I。机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后术中及最终病理检查中风险组与切缘阳性的关联。《中欧泌尿学杂志》。2021年;74:491 - 495。
Cent European J Urol. 2022;75(1):110. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2022.L1. Epub 2022 Jan 22.

本文引用的文献

1
NeuroSAFE frozen section during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: peri-operative and histopathological outcomes from the NeuroSAFE PROOF feasibility randomized controlled trial.神经安全冰冻切片在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的应用:来自神经安全 PROOF 可行性随机对照试验的围手术期和组织病理学结果。
BJU Int. 2021 Jun;127(6):676-686. doi: 10.1111/bju.15256. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
2
"Real-time" Assessment of Surgical Margins During Radical Prostatectomy: State-of-the-Art.实时评估在根治性前列腺切除术中的手术切缘:最新技术。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Apr;18(2):95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.07.012. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
3
Comparison of surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer.
前列腺癌患者机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的手术、肿瘤学及功能结局比较
Turk J Urol. 2019 Nov 1;45(6):410-417. doi: 10.5152/tud.2019.48457. Print 2019 Nov.
4
Surgeon volume and body mass index influence positive surgical margin risk after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Results in 732 cases.外科医生手术量和体重指数对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性风险的影响:732例病例结果
Arab J Urol. 2019 May 30;17(3):234-242. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1619276. eCollection 2019.
5
Risk of biochemical recurrence based on extent and location of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.基于机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后阳性手术切缘的范围和位置的生化复发风险。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Dec 27;18(1):1291. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5229-1.
6
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放经耻骨后前列腺根治术的比较:一项随机对照研究的 24 个月结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug;19(8):1051-1060. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30357-7. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
7
Positive surgical margin is associated with biochemical recurrence risk following radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis from high-quality retrospective cohort studies.阳性切缘与根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发风险相关:来自高质量回顾性队列研究的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul 3;16(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1433-3.
8
Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients: A System Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术对前列腺癌患者更有益:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Jan 14;24:272-287. doi: 10.12659/msm.907092.
9
Positive surgical margin in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: correlation with pathology findings and risk of biochemical recurrence.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的手术切缘阳性:与病理结果及生化复发风险的相关性
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Oct;69(5):493-500. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02707-2. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
10
Laparoscopic versus Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for the Treatment of Localised Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.腹腔镜与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的系统评价
Urol Int. 2016;96(4):373-8. doi: 10.1159/000435861. Epub 2015 Jul 18.