• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆注射毒品人群获得艾滋病毒预防服务的社会认知因素:一项综合的生物行为调查。

Socio-cognitive factors influencing access to HIV prevention services among people who inject drugs in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: An integrated bio-behavioural survey.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jan 28;17(1):e0261500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261500. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0261500
PMID:35089928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8797198/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

People who inject drugs (PWID) in Sub-Saharan Africa have limited access to comprehensive HIV services. While it is important to inform programming, knowledge about factors influencing access to comprehensive HIV services is scarce. We assessed the proportions of PWID with access to HIV prevention services and associated socio-cognitive factors in Tanzania.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among PWID between October and December 2017 in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Data on access to HIV prevention services, demographics and selected socio-cognitive factors were collected through structured face-to-face interviews. Weighted descriptive and forward selection multivariable logistics regression analyses were done to assess independent associations between HIV prevention services and predictors of interest. The results were two tailed and a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The study included 611 PWID (males: 94.4%) with a median age of 34 years (Interquartile Range (IQR), 29-38). A large majority of participants reported to have access to condoms (87.8%), sterile needles/syringes (72.8%) and ever tested for HIV (66.0%). About half (52.0%) reported to have used condoms in the past one month and about a third (28.5%) accessed a peer educator. The odds of testing for HIV decreased among participants who perceived their HIV risk to be high (aOR = 0.29; 95%CI: 0.17-0.49) and those experienced sexual violence (aOR = 0.60; 95%CI 0.37-0.98). However, the odds of testing for HIV increased among participants with secondary level of education (aOR = 2.16; 95%CI: 1.06-5.55), and those who reported having correct comprehensive HIV knowledge (CCHK) (aOR = 1.63; 95%CI 1.12-2.41). The odds of access to condoms increased among females (aOR = 2.23; 95%CI: 1.04-5.02) but decreased among participants with secondary level of education (aOR = 0.41; 95%CI: 0.19-0.84), an income of >TZS 200,000 (aOR = 0.39; 95%CI: 0.23-0.66) and those who perceived their HIV risk to be high (aOR = 0.13; 95%CI: 0.03-0.36). The odds of access to peer educators was higher among participants with primary (aOR = 1.61; 95%CI: 1.01-2.26), and secondary (aOR = 2.71; 95%CI: 1.39-5.33) levels of education. The odds of access to sterile needle and syringe decreased among participants who perceived their HIV risk to be high (aOR = 0.11;95%CI 0.05-0.22), and low-medium (aOR = 0.25;95%CI 0.11-0.52) but increased among those with primary level of education (aOR = 1.72;95%CI 1.06-2.78).

CONCLUSION

Access to condom, HIV testing, sterile needles and syringes were relatively high among PWID. However, condom use and access to peer educators was relatively low. HIV knowledge and risk perception, gender, education, and sexual violence influenced access to HIV prevention services. There is an urgent need to address the identified socio-cognitive factors and scale up all aspects of HIV prevention services to fast-track attainment of the 2025 UNAIDS goals and ending the HIV epidemic.

摘要

简介

在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,注射毒品的人(PWID)获得全面的 HIV 服务的机会有限。虽然了解这些因素对于制定计划很重要,但关于影响他们获得全面 HIV 服务的因素的知识却很少。我们评估了坦桑尼亚 PWID 获得 HIV 预防服务的比例,以及相关的社会认知因素。

方法

2017 年 10 月至 12 月期间,在坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆对 PWID 进行了横断面调查。通过结构化的面对面访谈收集了有关 HIV 预防服务、人口统计学和选定社会认知因素的数据。使用加权描述性和前向选择多变量逻辑回归分析来评估 HIV 预防服务与感兴趣的预测因素之间的独立关联。结果为双侧,p 值小于 0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

该研究纳入了 611 名 PWID(男性:94.4%),中位数年龄为 34 岁(四分位间距(IQR),29-38)。绝大多数参与者报告说能够获得避孕套(87.8%)、无菌针头/注射器(72.8%)和曾接受过 HIV 检测(66.0%)。大约一半(52.0%)的人报告在过去一个月内使用过避孕套,约三分之一(28.5%)的人接受过同伴教育者的帮助。参与者认为自己的 HIV 风险高(aOR = 0.29;95%CI:0.17-0.49)和经历过性暴力(aOR = 0.60;95%CI 0.37-0.98)时,接受 HIV 检测的可能性降低。然而,参与者具有中等教育水平(aOR = 2.16;95%CI:1.06-5.55)和正确的综合 HIV 知识(CCHK)(aOR = 1.63;95%CI 1.12-2.41)时,接受 HIV 检测的可能性增加。女性获得避孕套的可能性增加(aOR = 2.23;95%CI:1.04-5.02),但中等教育水平的参与者获得避孕套的可能性降低(aOR = 0.41;95%CI:0.19-0.84),收入超过 200,000 坦桑尼亚先令(aOR = 0.39;95%CI:0.23-0.66)和认为自己 HIV 风险高的参与者(aOR = 0.13;95%CI:0.03-0.36)。参与者具有小学(aOR = 1.61;95%CI:1.01-2.26)和中学(aOR = 2.71;95%CI:1.39-5.33)教育水平时,获得同伴教育者的可能性更高。参与者认为自己 HIV 风险高(aOR = 0.11;95%CI 0.05-0.22)和低中等(aOR = 0.25;95%CI 0.11-0.52)时,获得无菌针头和注射器的可能性降低,但具有小学教育水平(aOR = 1.72;95%CI 1.06-2.78)时,获得的可能性增加。

结论

PWID 获得避孕套、HIV 检测、无菌针头和注射器的比例相对较高。然而,避孕套的使用和获得同伴教育者的比例相对较低。HIV 知识和风险认知、性别、教育程度和性暴力影响了 HIV 预防服务的获得。迫切需要解决这些社会认知因素,并扩大所有方面的 HIV 预防服务,以加快实现 2025 年 UNAIDS 目标和终结 HIV 疫情。

相似文献

1
Socio-cognitive factors influencing access to HIV prevention services among people who inject drugs in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: An integrated bio-behavioural survey.影响坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆注射毒品人群获得艾滋病毒预防服务的社会认知因素:一项综合的生物行为调查。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 28;17(1):e0261500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261500. eCollection 2022.
2
Prevalence and risk factors associated with HIV-1 infection among people who inject drugs in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: a sign of successful intervention?坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆注射吸毒人群中 HIV-1 感染的流行情况及相关危险因素:干预成功的迹象?
Harm Reduct J. 2020 Mar 24;17(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12954-020-00364-5.
3
Operationalizing the HIV prevention cascade for PWID using the integrated bio-behavioural survey data from Ukraine.运用乌克兰综合生物行为调查数据为注射吸毒者实施艾滋病预防环节。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2020 Jun;23 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e25509. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25509.
4
Has resourcing of non-governmental harm-reduction organizations in Ukraine improved HIV prevention and treatment outcomes for people who inject drugs? Findings from multiple bio-behavioural surveys.乌克兰非政府减少伤害组织的资源配置是否改善了注射毒品者的艾滋病毒预防和治疗效果?来自多项生物行为调查的结果。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2020 Aug;23(8):e25608. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25608.
5
HIV/HCV co-infection and associated risk factors among injecting drug users in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: potential for HCV elimination.HIV/HCV 合并感染及坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆注射吸毒者中的相关危险因素:HCV 消除的可能性。
Harm Reduct J. 2019 Dec 11;16(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12954-019-0346-y.
6
Understanding hepatitis B, hepatitis C and HIV among people who inject drugs in South Africa: findings from a three-city cross-sectional survey.了解南非注射毒品人群中的乙型肝炎、丙型肝炎和 HIV:来自三个城市横断面调查的结果。
Harm Reduct J. 2019 Apr 11;16(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12954-019-0298-2.
7
A Mismatch between High-Risk Behaviors and Screening of Infectious Diseases among People Who Inject Drugs in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆注射吸毒者中高风险行为与传染病筛查之间的不匹配
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0148598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148598. eCollection 2016.
8
HIV prevalence and risk among people who inject drugs in five South African cities.南非五个城市注射毒品者中的艾滋病毒流行情况及风险
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Apr;30:107-15. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
9
An urgent need to scale-up injecting drug harm reduction services in Tanzania: prevalence of blood-borne viruses among drug users in Temeke District, Dar-es-Salaam, 2011.坦桑尼亚急需扩大注射毒品危害减少服务规模:2011 年达累斯萨拉姆坦盖雷区吸毒者中血源性病毒流行情况。
Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Jan;24(1):78-81. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.08.005. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
10
Young people who inject drugs in India have high HIV incidence and behavioural risk: a cross-sectional study.印度注射毒品的年轻人 HIV 发病率和行为风险较高:一项横断面研究。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 May;22(5):e25287. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25287.

引用本文的文献

1
Uptake of Oral HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) and Associated Factors among Female Sex Workers in Tanga, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚坦噶地区女性性工作者口服 HIV 暴露前预防(PrEP)的应用情况及相关因素。
Viruses. 2023 Oct 20;15(10):2125. doi: 10.3390/v15102125.
2
Contributing factors for self-reported HIV in male Peruvian inmates: results of the 2016 prison census.秘鲁男性囚犯自我报告感染艾滋病毒的影响因素:2016年监狱人口普查结果
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 25;11:1241042. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1241042. eCollection 2023.
3
The use of oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among people who inject drugs: barriers, and recommendations.注射吸毒者中口服艾滋病毒暴露前预防用药:障碍与建议
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 5;11:1265063. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1265063. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence and risk factors associated with HIV-1 infection among people who inject drugs in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: a sign of successful intervention?坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆注射吸毒人群中 HIV-1 感染的流行情况及相关危险因素:干预成功的迹象?
Harm Reduct J. 2020 Mar 24;17(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12954-020-00364-5.
2
Sociodemographic, Legal, and Clinical Profiles of Female Forensic Inpatients in Karnataka: A Retrospective Study.卡纳塔克邦女性法医住院患者的社会人口统计学、法律和临床概况:一项回顾性研究。
Indian J Psychol Med. 2019 Mar-Apr;41(2):138-143. doi: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_152_18.
3
HIV knowledge and risk behaviors among drug users in three Vietnamese mountainous provinces.越南三省山区吸毒者的 HIV 知识和危险行为。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2019 Jan 15;14(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13011-019-0191-8.
4
Risk perception and the influence on uptake and use of biomedical prevention interventions for HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic literature review.风险认知与撒哈拉以南非洲地区对 HIV 生物医学预防干预措施的接受和使用的影响:系统文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 14;13(6):e0198680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198680. eCollection 2018.
5
Stigma at every turn: Health services experiences among people who inject drugs.处处受歧视:注射毒品者的医疗服务体验。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jul;57:104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
6
Global prevalence of injecting drug use and sociodemographic characteristics and prevalence of HIV, HBV, and HCV in people who inject drugs: a multistage systematic review.全球注射吸毒流行状况以及注射吸毒者的社会人口学特征和艾滋病毒、乙肝病毒及丙肝病毒流行状况:多阶段系统评价。
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Dec;5(12):e1192-e1207. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30375-3. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
7
Can the UNAIDS 90-90-90 target be achieved? A systematic analysis of national HIV treatment cascades.联合国艾滋病规划署的90-90-90目标能够实现吗?对各国艾滋病治疗流程的系统分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2016 Sep 15;1(2):e000010. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2015-000010. eCollection 2016.
8
Rapid Decline in HIV Incidence Among Persons Who Inject Drugs During a Fast-Track Combination Prevention Program After an HIV Outbreak in Athens.雅典发生HIV疫情后,在一项快速综合预防计划期间,注射毒品者中HIV发病率迅速下降。
J Infect Dis. 2017 May 15;215(10):1496-1505. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix100.
9
Effectiveness of needle and syringe Programmes in people who inject drugs - An overview of systematic reviews.注射吸毒者中针头和注射器计划的有效性——系统评价概述
BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 11;17(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4210-2.
10
Substance Use and Associated Health Conditions throughout the Lifespan.一生中的物质使用及相关健康状况。
Public Health Rev. 2014;35(2). doi: 10.1007/BF03391702.