Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Faculty of Psychology, UniDistance Suisse, Brig, Switzerland.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Apr 1;77(4):695-703. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbac012.
Around the turn of the millennium, the "age-prospective memory (PM) paradox" challenged the classical assumption that older adults necessarily evidence a marked decline in PM functioning. As previous investigations highlighted ecological validity to be a potential explanation, the present study sought to extend established approaches by using novel real-world assessment technologies to examine PM unobtrusively in everyday-life conversations.
Next to laboratory PM tasks, real-life PM performance of 53 younger adults (19-32 years) and 38 older adults (60-81 years) was assessed from three sources: Over 9 days, participants completed an experimenter-given naturalistic task, a diary-based approach assessing self-assigned intentions, as well as an ambulatory assessment with the Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR), a device that unobtrusively samples ambient sounds to detect spontaneous speech production related to (lapses in) everyday PM.
Older adults showed lower performance in laboratory PM only for the time-based task and performed either equally well as or even better than younger adults in everyday PM. With regard to PM performance as captured in real-life ambient audio data, younger adults talked more frequently about PM than older adults, but no significant difference between younger and older adults was found for speech related to PM errors.
Findings confirmed older adults' preserved PM performance in everyday life across different indicators with increasing ecological validity. Furthermore, as a novel method to assess conversational PM in everyday life, the EAR opens new insights about the awareness of PM lapses and the communication of intentions in real life.
在千禧年前后,“年龄前瞻性记忆(PM)悖论”挑战了传统的假设,即老年人的 PM 功能必然会明显下降。由于之前的研究强调生态有效性是一个潜在的解释,本研究试图通过使用新的真实世界评估技术来扩展已建立的方法,在日常对话中不引人注目地检查 PM。
除了实验室 PM 任务外,还从三个来源评估了 53 名年轻成年人(19-32 岁)和 38 名老年成年人(60-81 岁)的真实 PM 表现:在 9 天内,参与者完成了一项由实验者给定的自然任务、一项基于日记的自我分配意图评估方法,以及使用电子激活记录器(EAR)进行的动态评估,该设备不引人注目地采样环境声音,以检测与日常 PM (失误)相关的自发言语产生。
老年人在实验室 PM 中仅在基于时间的任务中表现较差,而在日常 PM 中表现与年轻成年人相当或更好。就真实生活环境音频数据中捕获的 PM 表现而言,年轻成年人比老年成年人更频繁地谈论 PM,但在与 PM 错误相关的言语方面,年轻成年人和老年成年人之间没有发现显著差异。
研究结果证实了老年人在不同指标下在日常生活中保持 PM 表现的能力,具有更高的生态有效性。此外,作为一种在日常生活中评估对话 PM 的新方法,EAR 为 PM 失误的意识和真实生活中的意图沟通提供了新的见解。