Lee Vincent W P, Lai Daniel W L, Ou Xiaoting
Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Room GH410, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Faculty of Social Sciences, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2022 Jan 29;16(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13033-022-00518-x.
Integrated Community Centres for Mental Wellness (ICCMWs) provide district-based community support services for patients discharged from mental health facilities and other residents in Hong Kong. However, selecting locations for these community centres is challenging primarily because of community opposition, which has introduced barriers to responses to service users' interests and the operations of individual centres. This study examines public preferences for conflict resolution options, evaluates the feasibility of different consultation approaches, identifies effective methods for reducing public opposition and recommends possible approaches to public consultation and location selection.
A total of 74 individual interviews were conducted with key informants, including government personnel, service operators, politicians, resident representatives, community activists and service users. These interviewees were asked about their knowledge, experiences and perspectives of centre location selection processes.
Interviews revealed that neighbourhood consultations for establishing community centres for mental wellness are time-consuming and did not yield a consensus of support from residents. In some instances, the government may decide to delay or withdraw location selection plans because of strong public opposition mainly because of bias and misunderstanding towards service users. However, the role of local politicians in mediating neighbourhood opinions and the government's determination in planning location selection are essential for successfully selecting ICCMW locations.
Government departments should develop stronger collaboration to study target neighbourhoods and lobby stakeholders at earlier stages. Such investigations should involve identifying key stakeholders, the political and social dynamics of controversies and community demographics. A protocol specifying a time frame should be implemented to facilitate smooth and effective public consultation and community mental health service location selection processes.
综合社区精神健康中心(ICCMWs)为香港精神健康机构出院患者及其他居民提供以地区为基础的社区支持服务。然而,为这些社区中心选址颇具挑战性,主要原因是社区反对,这给回应服务使用者的需求以及各中心的运营带来了障碍。本研究考察公众对冲突解决选项的偏好,评估不同咨询方法的可行性,确定减少公众反对的有效方法,并推荐公众咨询及选址的可能方法。
对包括政府人员、服务运营者、政治家、居民代表、社区活动家及服务使用者在内的关键信息提供者进行了总共74次个人访谈。询问这些受访者关于他们对中心选址过程的了解、经验及看法。
访谈显示,就设立精神健康社区中心进行邻里协商耗时且未获得居民的一致支持。在某些情况下,由于公众强烈反对,主要是对服务使用者存在偏见和误解,政府可能决定推迟或撤回选址计划。然而,当地政治家在调解邻里意见方面的作用以及政府在规划选址方面的决心对于成功选定综合社区精神健康中心的地点至关重要。
政府部门应加强合作,在早期阶段研究目标邻里并游说利益相关者。此类调查应包括确定关键利益相关者、争议的政治和社会动态以及社区人口统计数据。应实施规定时间框架的方案,以促进顺利且有效的公众咨询及社区精神健康服务选址过程。