• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非小细胞肺癌患者的血浆游离DNA检测:与基于组织的结果相比,液滴数字PCR与下一代测序的比较

Plasma Cell-Free DNA Testing of Patients With EGFR Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Droplet Digital PCR Versus Next-Generation Sequencing Compared With Tissue-Based Results.

作者信息

Steendam Christi M J, Atmodimedjo Peggy, de Jonge Evert, Paats Marthe S, van der Leest Cor, Oomen-de Hoop Esther, Jansen Maurice P H M, Del Re Marzia, von der Thüsen Jan H, Dinjens Winand N M, van Schaik Ron H N, Aerts Joachim G J V, Dubbink Hendrikus Jan

机构信息

Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.

出版信息

JCO Precis Oncol. 2019 Dec;3:1-9. doi: 10.1200/PO.18.00401.

DOI:10.1200/PO.18.00401
PMID:35100738
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the results of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) on detection of epidermal growth factor receptor () primary activating mutations and p.T790M with results of tissue analysis in patients with mutated non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

All patients with EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer for which a pathology and a plasma specimen were available upon progression between November 2016 and July 2018 were selected. Concordance, Cohen's κ, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated.

RESULTS

Plasma cfDNA and pathology specimens of 36 patients were analyzed. Agreement between ddPCR and NGS was 86% (κ = 0.63) for the primary activating mutation and 94% (κ = 0.89) for the p.T790M detection. Allele ratios were comparable, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.992 and 0.997, respectively. Discrepancies of some degree were found in 15 patients (41.7%). In six patients (16.7%), no mutations were detected in cfDNA. In three patients (8.3%), p.T790M was detected in plasma but not in the pathology specimen, whereas in three other patients (8.3%), p.T790M was demonstrated in the pathology specimen but not in plasma. Concordance of cfDNA and pathology for the primary activating mutation was 69% for ddPCR and 83% for NGS. For the detection of p.T790M, this was 75% (κ = 0.49) for ddPCR as well as for NGS.

CONCLUSION

Mutual agreement is high between NGS and ddPCR in cfDNA on the level of a specific mutation, with comparable ratio results. Plasma testing of primary activating mutations and p.T790M shows high concordance with pathology results, for NGS as well as for ddPCR, depending on the extent of the panel used. In NGS, more genetic aberrations can be investigated at once.

摘要

目的

比较血浆游离DNA(cfDNA)液滴数字PCR(ddPCR)和下一代测序(NGS)检测表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)原发性激活突变及p.T790M的结果与EGFR突变的非小细胞肺癌患者组织分析结果。

方法

选取2016年11月至2018年7月疾病进展时可获得病理和血浆标本的所有EGFR突变的非小细胞肺癌患者。计算一致性、科恩kappa系数和组内相关系数。

结果

分析了36例患者的血浆cfDNA和病理标本。ddPCR和NGS检测原发性激活突变的一致性为86%(κ = 0.63),检测p.T790M的一致性为94%(κ = 0.89)。等位基因比率具有可比性,组内相关系数分别为0.992和0.997。15例患者(41.7%)存在一定程度的差异。6例患者(16.7%)的cfDNA未检测到突变。3例患者(8.3%)血浆中检测到p.T790M,但病理标本中未检测到;另外3例患者(8.3%)病理标本中检测到p.T790M,但血浆中未检测到。ddPCR检测原发性激活突变时cfDNA与病理结果的一致性为69%,NGS为83%。对于p.T790M的检测,ddPCR和NGS均为75%(κ = 0.49)。

结论

在cfDNA中,NGS和ddPCR在特定突变水平上的相互一致性较高,比率结果具有可比性。EGFR原发性激活突变和p.T790M的血浆检测与病理结果具有高度一致性,对于NGS和ddPCR均如此,这取决于所使用检测组合的范围。在NGS中,可以同时研究更多的基因畸变。

相似文献

1
Plasma Cell-Free DNA Testing of Patients With EGFR Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Droplet Digital PCR Versus Next-Generation Sequencing Compared With Tissue-Based Results.表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非小细胞肺癌患者的血浆游离DNA检测:与基于组织的结果相比,液滴数字PCR与下一代测序的比较
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019 Dec;3:1-9. doi: 10.1200/PO.18.00401.
2
Picoliter-Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Analysis of Cell-Free Plasma DNA to Assess EGFR Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinoma That Confer Resistance to Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitors.基于皮升液滴数字聚合酶链反应的游离血浆DNA分析,以评估肺腺癌中对酪氨酸激酶抑制剂产生耐药性的表皮生长因子受体突变
Oncologist. 2016 Feb;21(2):156-64. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0288. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
3
Detection of Plasma EGFR Mutations in NSCLC Patients with a Validated ddPCR Lung cfDNA Assay.采用经过验证的数字滴度聚合酶链反应(ddPCR)检测非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者血浆表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变情况。
J Cancer. 2019 Jul 10;10(18):4341-4349. doi: 10.7150/jca.31326. eCollection 2019.
4
Profiling of circulating tumor DNA in plasma of non-small cell lung cancer patients, monitoring of epidermal growth factor receptor p.T790M mutated allelic fraction using beads, emulsion, amplification, and magnetics companion assay and evaluation in future application in mimicking circulating tumor cells.对非小细胞肺癌患者血浆中循环肿瘤 DNA 进行分析,使用珠子、乳液、扩增和磁珠辅助检测法监测表皮生长因子受体 p.T790M 突变等位基因分数,并评估其在模拟循环肿瘤细胞中的未来应用。
Cancer Med. 2019 Jul;8(8):3685-3697. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2244. Epub 2019 May 21.
5
Application of ddPCR in detection of the status and abundance of EGFR T790M mutation in the plasma samples of non-small cell lung cancer patients.数字滴液聚合酶链反应在非小细胞肺癌患者血浆样本中表皮生长因子受体T790M突变状态及丰度检测中的应用
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 26;12:942123. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.942123. eCollection 2022.
6
Detection and quantification of T790M mutation in liquid biopsies by droplet digital PCR.通过液滴数字PCR检测和定量液体活检中的T790M突变
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Mar;10(3):1200-1208. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-1010.
7
Impact of ramucirumab plus erlotinib on circulating cell-free DNA from patients with untreated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with -activating mutations (RELAY phase 3 randomized study).雷莫西尤单抗联合厄洛替尼对未经治疗的具有表皮生长因子受体激活突变的转移性非小细胞肺癌患者循环游离DNA的影响(RELAY 3期随机研究)
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2023 Aug 30;12(8):1702-1716. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-22-736. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
8
T790M detection rate in lung adenocarcinomas at baseline using droplet digital PCR and validation by ultra-deep next generation sequencing.使用液滴数字PCR检测肺腺癌基线时的T790M突变率,并通过超深度二代测序进行验证。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019 Oct;8(5):584-592. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.09.18.
9
Detection of EGFR Activating and Resistance Mutations by Droplet Digital PCR in Sputum of EGFR-Mutated NSCLC Patients.采用液滴数字PCR检测EGFR突变型非小细胞肺癌患者痰液中EGFR激活突变和耐药突变
Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2021 Feb 17;15:1179554921993072. doi: 10.1177/1179554921993072. eCollection 2021.
10
Validation of a next-generation sequencing assay for the detection of EGFR mutations in cell-free circulating tumor DNA.一种用于检测游离循环肿瘤 DNA 中 EGFR 突变的下一代测序检测方法的验证。
Exp Mol Pathol. 2021 Dec;123:104685. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2021.104685. Epub 2021 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Expert consensus on the use of third-generation EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer with various T790M mutations post-resistance to first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs.第一代/第二代表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)耐药后出现各种T790M突变的EGFR突变晚期非小细胞肺癌中使用第三代EGFR-TKIs的专家共识
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024 Oct 17;16:17588359241289648. doi: 10.1177/17588359241289648. eCollection 2024.
2
Assessing the Sensitivity of Nested PCR Followed by Direct Sequencing on Exosomal DNA for EGFR Mutation Detection in NSCL.评估巢式 PCR 联合直接测序法检测 NSCLC 患者外显子 DNA 中 EGFR 基因突变的灵敏度。
Iran Biomed J. 2024 Jul 1;28(4):208-15. doi: 10.61186/ibj.4289.
3
Brief Report: Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Versus Plasma Next-Generation Sequencing in Detecting Clearance of Plasma EGFR Mutations and Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels as a Surrogate Measure.
简要报告:在检测血浆表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变清除情况及癌胚抗原水平作为替代指标方面, droplet数字聚合酶链反应与血浆下一代测序的比较
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2023 Nov 2;4(12):100599. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100599. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Liquid Biopsies for Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenoma Screening and Surveillance: What to Measure?用于结直肠癌和晚期腺瘤筛查及监测的液体活检:检测什么?
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 17;15(18):4607. doi: 10.3390/cancers15184607.
5
Detection of EGFR Mutations in Plasma cfDNA and Paired CTCs of NSCLC Patients before and after Osimertinib Therapy Using Crystal Digital PCR.使用晶体数字PCR检测奥希替尼治疗前后非小细胞肺癌患者血浆循环游离DNA和配对循环肿瘤细胞中的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 31;13(11):2736. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112736.
6
Molecular characterization of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients by cfDNA analysis: experience from routine laboratory practice.通过cfDNA分析对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者进行分子特征分析:来自常规实验室实践的经验
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Mar;13(3):1658-1670. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-3142.
7
Plasma Predictive Features in Treating EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.治疗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非小细胞肺癌的血浆预测特征
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Oct 29;12(11):3179. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113179.
8
Discovery of Targetable Genetic Alterations in NSCLC Patients with Different Metastatic Patterns Using a MassARRAY-Based Circulating Tumor DNA Assay.利用基于 MassARRAY 的循环肿瘤 DNA 检测方法在具有不同转移模式的 NSCLC 患者中发现可靶向的遗传改变。
Cells. 2020 Oct 22;9(11):2337. doi: 10.3390/cells9112337.
9
Comparison of variant allele frequency and number of mutant molecules as units of measurement for circulating tumor DNA.循环肿瘤 DNA 测量指标中变异等位基因频率与突变分子数的比较
Mol Oncol. 2021 Jan;15(1):57-66. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12827. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
10
erbB in NSCLC as a molecular target: current evidences and future directions.非小细胞肺癌中的 erbB 作为一个分子靶点:当前的证据和未来的方向。
ESMO Open. 2020 Aug;5(4). doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000724.