• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利多卡因、肾上腺素和丁卡因在儿童裂伤修复中的三联与单联应用。

Triple Versus Single Application of Lidocaine, Epinephrine, and Tetracaine for Laceration Repair in Children.

机构信息

From the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Faculty, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange.

David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022 Feb 1;38(2):e472-e474. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002631.

DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000002631
PMID:35100752
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Lidocaine (4%), epinephrine (0.1%), and tetracaine (0.5%) topical gel (LET) is a safe and effective method of providing anesthesia for laceration repair. Some patients, however, require additional infiltrated local anesthetic. We sought to determine if 3 applications of LET 10 minutes apart (triple LET) result in lower pain scores with suturing than one application for 30 minutes (single LET).

METHODS

We performed a randomized single-blind controlled trial of pediatric emergency department patients 7 to 17 years old with simple lacerations requiring sutures. Patients received either triple or single LET, and the first suture was placed or attempted within 15 minutes of removing the LET. Visual analog pain score on a 100-mm scale was obtained by a blinded nurse. Pain scores between groups were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were enrolled: 21 for single LET and 27 for triple LET. Mean visual analog pain scale (VAS) score for single LET patients was 16 (SD, 17; range, 0-48), and that for triple LET patients was 16 (SD, 24; range, 0-95), with the difference not significant at 0.37 (95% confidence interval, -11.9 to 12.6). There was no significant difference in requirement for additional anesthesia between single LET (4 of 21 [19%]) and triple LET (5 of 27 [19%]) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Lidocaine (4%), epinephrine (0.1%), and tetracaine (0.5%) topical gel every 10 minutes for 3 applications was not superior in anesthetic efficacy to applying it once for 30 minutes.

摘要

目的

利多卡因(4%)、肾上腺素(0.1%)和四卡因(0.5%)局部凝胶(LET)是一种安全有效的麻醉方法,可用于裂伤修复。然而,一些患者需要额外的局部浸润麻醉。我们试图确定 10 分钟给予 3 次 LET(三重 LET)与 30 分钟给予 1 次(单次 LET)相比,在缝合时疼痛评分是否更低。

方法

我们对 7 至 17 岁需要缝合的简单裂伤的儿科急诊科患者进行了随机单盲对照试验。患者接受三重 LET 或单次 LET,去除 LET 后 15 分钟内放置或尝试第一针缝线。由盲法护士使用 100mm 刻度的视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)获得疼痛评分。使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验比较组间疼痛评分。

结果

共纳入 48 例患者:21 例接受单次 LET,27 例接受三重 LET。单次 LET 患者的平均视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)评分为 16(SD,17;范围,0-48),三重 LET 患者为 16(SD,24;范围,0-95),差异无统计学意义(0.37,95%置信区间,-11.9 至 12.6)。在额外麻醉需求方面,单次 LET(21 例中的 4 例[19%])和三重 LET(27 例中的 5 例[19%])患者之间无显著差异。

结论

利多卡因(4%)、肾上腺素(0.1%)和四卡因(0.5%)局部凝胶每 10 分钟应用 3 次在麻醉效果上并不优于单次应用 30 分钟。

相似文献

1
Triple Versus Single Application of Lidocaine, Epinephrine, and Tetracaine for Laceration Repair in Children.利多卡因、肾上腺素和丁卡因在儿童裂伤修复中的三联与单联应用。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022 Feb 1;38(2):e472-e474. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002631.
2
Pretreatment of lacerations with lidocaine, epinephrine, and tetracaine at triage: a randomized double-blind trial.在分诊时用利多卡因、肾上腺素和丁卡因预处理撕裂伤:一项随机双盲试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Jul;7(7):751-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02262.x.
3
Topical anesthesia for pediatric lacerations: a randomized trial of lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine solution versus gel.小儿裂伤的局部麻醉:利多卡因-肾上腺素-丁卡因溶液与凝胶的随机试验
Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Dec;32(6):693-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70069-1.
4
Tetracaine, epinephrine (adrenalin), and cocaine (TAC) versus lidocaine, epinephrine, and tetracaine (LET) for anesthesia of lacerations in children.丁卡因、肾上腺素(肾上腺素)和可卡因(TAC)与利多卡因、肾上腺素和丁卡因(LET)用于儿童裂伤麻醉的比较。
Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Feb;25(2):203-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70325-x.
5
Does the use of topical lidocaine, epinephrine, and tetracaine solution provide sufficient anesthesia for laceration repair?局部使用利多卡因、肾上腺素和丁卡因溶液能否为裂伤修复提供足够的麻醉效果?
Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Feb;5(2):108-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02593.x.
6
Lidocaine adrenaline tetracaine gel versus tetracaine adrenaline cocaine gel for topical anesthesia in linear scalp and facial lacerations in children aged 5 to 17 years.利多卡因肾上腺素丁卡因凝胶与丁卡因肾上腺素可卡因凝胶用于5至17岁儿童头皮线性裂伤和面部裂伤的局部麻醉比较
Pediatrics. 1995 Feb;95(2):255-8.
7
Lidocaine-Epinephrine-Tetracaine Gel Is More Efficient than Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics and Mepivacaine Injection for Pain Control during Skin Repair in Children: A Prospective, Propensity Score Matched Two-Center Study.利多卡因-肾上腺素-四卡因凝胶在儿童皮肤修复过程中控制疼痛方面比局部麻醉药和甲哌卡因的共晶混合物注射更有效:一项前瞻性、倾向评分匹配的两中心研究。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2020 Dec;30(6):512-516. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3400283. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
8
Efficacy of pain control with topical lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine during laceration repair with tissue adhesive in children: a randomized controlled trial.利多卡因-肾上腺素-丁卡因局部麻醉在儿童组织黏合伤口修复术中的镇痛效果:一项随机对照试验。
CMAJ. 2013 Sep 17;185(13):E629-34. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130269. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
9
Let Us Use LET: A Quality Improvement Initiative.让我们使用LET:一项质量改进计划。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016 Jul;32(7):440-3. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000276.
10
New non-cocaine-containing topical anesthetics compared with tetracaine-adrenaline-cocaine during repair of lacerations.在裂伤修复过程中,将新型不含可卡因的局部麻醉剂与丁卡因-肾上腺素-可卡因进行比较。
Pediatrics. 1997 Nov;100(5):825-30. doi: 10.1542/peds.100.5.825.

引用本文的文献

1
Rapid local anesthesia in children enhanced by STAR particles: a first-in-humans, randomized clinical trial.STAR颗粒增强儿童快速局部麻醉:一项首次人体随机临床试验
Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s13346-025-01899-5.