• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects of red blood cell transfusions given to non-septic critically ill patients: a propensity score matched study.红细胞输注对非脓毒症危重症患者的影响:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2021;53(5):390-397. doi: 10.5114/ait.2021.111739.
2
Mortality and morbidity of low-grade red blood cell transfusions in septic patients: a propensity score-matched observational study of a liberal transfusion strategy.脓毒症患者接受低剂量红细胞输血的死亡率和发病率:一项关于宽松输血策略的倾向评分匹配观察性研究
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Aug 8;10(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00727-y.
3
Benefits and harms of red blood cell transfusions in patients with septic shock in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中感染性休克患者红细胞输血的益处与危害
Dan Med J. 2016 Feb;63(2).
4
Blood transfusion practice in critically ill patients: a single institutional experience.危重症患者的输血实践:单机构经验。
Med Princ Pract. 2012;21(6):560-5. doi: 10.1159/000338887. Epub 2012 May 25.
5
The CRIT Study: Anemia and blood transfusion in the critically ill--current clinical practice in the United States.CRIT研究:危重症患者的贫血与输血——美国当前的临床实践
Crit Care Med. 2004 Jan;32(1):39-52. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000104112.34142.79.
6
Adherence to a restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy in critically ill patients: An observational study.危重症患者遵循限制性红细胞输血策略:一项观察性研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Jul;68(6):812-820. doi: 10.1111/aas.14402. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
7
Red blood cell transfusion in septic shock - clinical characteristics and outcome of unselected patients in a prospective, multicentre cohort.脓毒性休克患者的红细胞输注——一项前瞻性多中心队列研究中未经选择患者的临床特征及预后
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2014 Feb 27;22:14. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-22-14.
8
Anemia and blood transfusion in critically ill patients.危重症患者的贫血与输血
JAMA. 2002 Sep 25;288(12):1499-507. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.12.1499.
9
Recommendations on RBC Transfusions for Critically Ill Children With Nonhemorrhagic Shock From the Pediatric Critical Care Transfusion and Anemia Expertise Initiative.儿科危重病输血和贫血专业知识倡议:关于非出血性休克危重症儿童红细胞输注的建议。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;19(9S Suppl 1):S121-S126. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001620.
10
Red blood cell transfusions are associated with lower mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a propensity-matched analysis*.红细胞输注与严重脓毒症和感染性休克患者的死亡率降低相关:一项倾向评分匹配分析*。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Dec;40(12):3140-5. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182657b75.

引用本文的文献

1
Announcing new members of the Advisory Editorial Board.宣布顾问编辑委员会的新成员。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2021;53(4):289. doi: 10.5114/ait.2021.110564.

本文引用的文献

1
Mortality and morbidity of low-grade red blood cell transfusions in septic patients: a propensity score-matched observational study of a liberal transfusion strategy.脓毒症患者接受低剂量红细胞输血的死亡率和发病率:一项关于宽松输血策略的倾向评分匹配观察性研究
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Aug 8;10(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00727-y.
2
Transfusion strategies in non-bleeding critically ill adults: a clinical practice guideline from the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.非出血性危重症成人输血策略:欧洲重症监护医学学会临床实践指南。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Apr;46(4):673-696. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05884-8. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
3
Days alive and free as an alternative to a mortality outcome in pivotal vasopressor and septic shock trials.作为主要血管加压药和脓毒性休克试验死亡率结局的替代指标,存活天数和无残疾天数。
J Crit Care. 2018 Oct;47:333-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 12.
4
Worldwide audit of blood transfusion practice in critically ill patients.全球危重症患者输血实践审计。
Crit Care. 2018 Apr 19;22(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2018-9.
5
Mechanisms of red blood cell transfusion-related immunomodulation.红细胞输血相关免疫调节机制。
Transfusion. 2018 Mar;58(3):804-815. doi: 10.1111/trf.14488. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
6
Indications for and Adverse Effects of Red-Cell Transfusion.红细胞输注的适应证及不良反应
N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 28;377(13):1261-1272. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1612789.
7
Effect of dextran-70 on outcome in severe sepsis; a propensity-score matching study.右旋糖酐70对严重脓毒症预后的影响;一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Jul 6;25(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0413-x.
8
Anemia and Red Blood Cell Transfusion: Advances in Critical Care.贫血与红细胞输血:重症监护领域的进展
Crit Care Clin. 2017 Apr;33(2):345-364. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2016.12.011.
9
Transfusion thresholds and other strategies for guiding allogeneic red blood cell transfusion.输血阈值及指导异体红细胞输血的其他策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 12;10(10):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub4.
10
Restrictive versus liberal blood transfusion for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (TRIGGER): a pragmatic, open-label, cluster randomised feasibility trial.限制与自由输血用于急性上消化道出血(TRIGGER):一项实用、开放标签、整群随机可行性试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jul 11;386(9989):137-44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61999-1. Epub 2015 May 5.

红细胞输注对非脓毒症危重症患者的影响:一项倾向评分匹配研究。

Effects of red blood cell transfusions given to non-septic critically ill patients: a propensity score matched study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, Medical Faculty, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Department of Intensive and Perioperative Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2021;53(5):390-397. doi: 10.5114/ait.2021.111739.

DOI:10.5114/ait.2021.111739
PMID:35100796
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10172944/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have demonstrated that low-grade red blood cell transfusions (RBC) given to septic patients are harmful. The objectives of the present study were to compare mortality and morbidity in non-septic critically ill patients who were given low-grade RBC transfusions at haemoglobin level > 70 γ L-1 with patients without RBC-transfusions any of the first 5 days in intensive care.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Adult patients admitted to a general intensive care unit between 2007 and 2018 at a university hospital were eligible for inclusion. Patients who received > 2 units RBC transfusion per day during the first 5 days after admisasion, with pre-transfusion haemoglobin level < 70 γ L-1 or with severe sepsis or septic shock, were excluded.

RESULTS

In total, 9491 admissions were recorded during the study period. Propensity score matching resulted in 2 well matched groups with 674 unique patients in each. Median pre-transfusion haemoglobin was 98 γ L-1 (interquartile range 91-107 γ L-1). Mortality was higher in the RBC group with an absolute risk increase for death at 180 days of 5.9% (95% CI: 3.6-8.3; P < 0.001). Low-grade RBC-transfusion was also associated with renal, circulatory, and respiratory failure as well as a higher SOFA-max score. Sensitivity analyses suggested that disease trajectories during the exposure time did not significantly differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-grade RBC-transfusions given to non-septic critically ill patients without significant anaemia were associated with increased mortality, increased kidney, circulatory, and respiratory failure, as well as higher SOFA-max score.

摘要

介绍

先前的研究表明,给脓毒症患者输注低剂量红细胞(RBC)是有害的。本研究的目的是比较血红蛋白水平> 70 γ L-1的非脓毒症危重症患者在第 1 天至第 5 天内输注低剂量 RBC 与无任何 RBC 输注的患者的死亡率和发病率在重症监护室。

材料和方法

符合条件的患者为 2007 年至 2018 年期间在一家大学医院普通重症监护病房住院的成年患者。排除了在入院后第 1 天内每天接受> 2 单位 RBC 输注、输血前血红蛋白水平< 70 γ L-1或患有严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克的患者。

结果

在研究期间共记录了 9491 次入院。通过倾向评分匹配得到了 2 个匹配良好的组,每组各有 674 例独特的患者。输血前血红蛋白中位数为 98 γ L-1(四分位距 91-107 γ L-1)。RBC 组的死亡率更高,180 天死亡率的绝对风险增加 5.9%(95%CI:3.6-8.3;P < 0.001)。低剂量 RBC 输血也与肾功能衰竭、循环衰竭和呼吸衰竭以及更高的 SOFA-max 评分相关。敏感性分析表明,两组在暴露期间的疾病轨迹没有显著差异。

结论

给无明显贫血的非脓毒症危重症患者输注低剂量 RBC 与死亡率增加、肾功能衰竭、循环衰竭和呼吸衰竭以及更高的 SOFA-max 评分相关。