• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

hlaR:一种快速且可重复的工具,用于识别移植供体和受者之间的 eplet 错配。

hlaR: A rapid and reproducible tool to identify eplet mismatches between transplant donors and recipients.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Emory University, United States.

Department of Pathology, Emory University, United States.

出版信息

Hum Immunol. 2022 Mar;83(3):248-255. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2022.01.007. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.humimm.2022.01.007
PMID:35101308
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11016307/
Abstract

Eplet mismatch load, both overall and at the single molecule level, correlates with transplant recipient outcomes. However, precise eplet assessment requires high-resolution HLA typing of both the donor and recipient. Anything less than high-resolution typing requires imputation of HLA types. The currently available methods to identify eplet mismatch are both tedious and demanding. Therefore, we developed a software package and user-friendly web application (hlaR), that simplifies the workflow of eplet analysis, provides functions to impute high-resolution from low-resolution data and calculates both overall and single molecule eplet mismatch for single or multiple donor recipient pairs. Compared to manual assessments using currently available tools (namely, HLAMatchMaker), hlaR resulted in only minimal discrepancy in eplet mismatches (mean absolute difference of 0.56 for class I and 0.86 for class II for unique sum across loci). Additionally, output of the single molecule eplet function compared well to manual calculation, with an average single antigen count increase of 0.19. Importantly, the hlaR tool permits rapid and reproducible imputation and eplet mismatch including comparison between eplet reference tables (e.g. HLAMatchMaker version 2 or 3). Users can import data from a spreadsheet rather than relying on keystroke entry of individual donor and recipient data, thus reducing the risk of data entry errors. The resulting improved scalability of the hlaR tool is highlighted by plotting analysis time against the size of the input dataset. The new hlaR tool can provide eplet mismatch data with a streamlined workflow. With decreased effort from the end user, eplet matching and mismatch load data can be further incorporated into both research and clinical use.

摘要

错配负荷,无论是整体水平还是单分子水平,都与移植受者的结局相关。然而,精确的错配评估需要对供体和受者进行高分辨率 HLA 分型。任何低于高分辨率的分型都需要 HLA 类型的推断。目前用于识别错配的方法既繁琐又费力。因此,我们开发了一个软件包和用户友好的网络应用程序(hlaR),简化了错配分析的工作流程,提供了从低分辨率数据推断高分辨率的功能,并计算了单个或多个供受者对的整体和单分子错配。与使用当前可用工具(即 HLAMatchMaker)进行手动评估相比,hlaR 在错配方面的差异仅最小(在独特的基因座总和方面,I 类的平均绝对差异为 0.56,II 类为 0.86)。此外,单分子错配功能的输出与手动计算结果相当,平均单个抗原计数增加了 0.19。重要的是,hlaR 工具允许快速和可重复的推断和错配,包括在错配参考表之间进行比较(例如,HLAMatchMaker 版本 2 或 3)。用户可以从电子表格导入数据,而不必依赖单个供者和受者数据的键输入,从而降低了数据输入错误的风险。hlaR 工具的改进可扩展性通过绘制分析时间与输入数据集大小的关系来突出显示。新的 hlaR 工具可以提供简化的工作流程的错配数据。通过减少最终用户的工作量,可以进一步将错配匹配和错配负荷数据纳入研究和临床应用中。

相似文献

1
hlaR: A rapid and reproducible tool to identify eplet mismatches between transplant donors and recipients.hlaR:一种快速且可重复的工具,用于识别移植供体和受者之间的 eplet 错配。
Hum Immunol. 2022 Mar;83(3):248-255. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2022.01.007. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
2
Eplet Mismatch Load and Occurrence of Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies, Rejection, and Graft Failure after Kidney Transplantation: An Observational Cohort Study.Eplet 错配负荷与供体特异性抗 HLA 抗体、排斥反应和肾移植后移植物失败的发生:一项观察性队列研究。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Sep;31(9):2193-2204. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020010019. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
3
Human leukocyte antigen eplet mismatching is associated with increased risk of graft loss and rejection after pediatric heart transplant.人类白细胞抗原 eplet 错配与儿科心脏移植后移植物丢失和排斥风险增加相关。
Pediatr Transplant. 2022 Feb;26(1):e14126. doi: 10.1111/petr.14126. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
4
Eplet mismatch analysis and allograft outcome across racially diverse groups in a pediatric transplant cohort: a single-center analysis.在一个儿科移植队列中,对不同种族群体进行 Eplet 错配分析和同种异体移植结果:一项单中心分析。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2020 Jan;35(1):83-94. doi: 10.1007/s00467-019-04344-1. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
5
The Accuracy of Sequence-Specific Oligonucleotide and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction HLA Typing in Determining the Presence of Pre-Transplant Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies and Total Eplet Mismatches for Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation.序列特异性寡核苷酸和实时聚合酶链反应 HLA 分型在确定移植前供体特异性抗 HLA 抗体和已故供体肾移植的总表位错配存在中的准确性。
Front Immunol. 2022 Jun 20;13:844438. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.844438. eCollection 2022.
6
Impact of HLA Eplet Mismatch on De Novo Donor Specific Antibody Formation After Kidney Transplantation.HLA 表位错配对肾移植后新的供体特异性抗体形成的影响。
Transplant Proc. 2024 Apr;56(3):515-520. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.01.030. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
7
Donor selection in pediatric kidney transplantation using DR and DQ eplet mismatching: A new histocompatibility paradigm.使用DR和DQ表位错配进行小儿肾移植供体选择:一种新的组织相容性模式。
Pediatr Transplant. 2016 Nov;20(7):926-930. doi: 10.1111/petr.12762. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
8
Urinary CXCL10 specifically relates to HLA-DQ eplet mismatch load in kidney transplant recipients.尿 CXCL10 与肾移植受者 HLA-DQ 等位基因簇错配负荷特异性相关。
Transpl Immunol. 2022 Feb;70:101494. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2021.101494. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
9
Eplet mismatches associated with de novo donor-specific HLA antibody in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.供者特异性 HLA 抗体相关的 Eplet 错配与儿科肾移植受者。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2021 Dec;36(12):3971-3979. doi: 10.1007/s00467-021-05078-9. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
10
Different eplet software programs give discordant and incorrect results: An analysis of HLAMatchmaker vs Fusion Matchmaker Eplet calling software.不同的表位软件程序给出不一致且错误的结果:HLAMatchmaker与Fusion Matchmaker表位调用软件的分析
HLA. 2020 Jul;96(1):52-63. doi: 10.1111/tan.13897. Epub 2020 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
HLA Genotype Imputation Results in Largely Accurate Epitope Mismatch Risk Categorization Across Racial Groups.HLA基因型推算在很大程度上能准确对不同种族群体的表位错配风险进行分类。
Transplant Direct. 2024 Jun 20;10(7):e1639. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001639. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Belatacept with time-limited tacrolimus coimmunosuppression modifies the 3-year risk of eplet mismatch in kidney transplantation.贝伐珠单抗联合限时他克莫司免疫抑制可改变肾移植 3 年内供者特异性抗体错配的风险。
Am J Transplant. 2024 Feb;24(2):260-270. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.09.011. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
3
Progress in kidney transplantation: The role for systems immunology.

本文引用的文献

1
On Path to Informing Hierarchy of Eplet Mismatches as Determinants of Kidney Transplant Loss.探寻将表位错配等级作为肾移植失败决定因素的依据。
Kidney Int Rep. 2021 Mar 30;6(6):1567-1579. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.03.877. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
Accurate eplet identification is necessary for accurate risk assessment.准确识别表位对于准确的风险评估是必要的。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Oct;21(10):3504. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16612. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
3
Second field high-resolution HLA typing for immunologic risk stratification in kidney transplantation.
肾移植的进展:系统免疫学的作用
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 16;9:1070385. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1070385. eCollection 2022.
用于肾移植免疫风险分层的第二代高分辨率HLA分型
Am J Transplant. 2021 Oct;21(10):3502-3503. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16606. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
4
Eplet mismatch imputation studies should include immunologic risk assessment.表位错配归因研究应包括免疫风险评估。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Oct;21(10):3500-3501. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16562. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
5
Eplet mismatch scores and de novo donor-specific antibody development in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.在胰肾联合移植中,Eplet 错配评分与新生供者特异性抗体的产生。
Hum Immunol. 2021 Mar;82(3):139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2020.12.009. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
6
Low Hydrophobic Mismatch Scores Calculated for HLA-A/B/DR/DQ Loci Improve Kidney Allograft Survival.为HLA - A/B/DR/DQ位点计算的低疏水错配分数可提高肾移植存活率。
Front Immunol. 2020 Oct 29;11:580752. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.580752. eCollection 2020.
7
HLA class II eplet mismatch load improves prediction of dnDSA development after living donor kidney transplantation.HLA Ⅱ类错配负荷可提高活体供肾移植后 dnDSA 发展的预测能力。
Int J Immunogenet. 2021 Feb;48(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/iji.12519. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
8
Eplet Mismatch Load and Occurrence of Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies, Rejection, and Graft Failure after Kidney Transplantation: An Observational Cohort Study.Eplet 错配负荷与供体特异性抗 HLA 抗体、排斥反应和肾移植后移植物失败的发生:一项观察性队列研究。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Sep;31(9):2193-2204. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020010019. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
9
Substituting imputation of HLA antigens for high-resolution HLA typing: Evaluation of a multiethnic population and implications for clinical decision making in transplantation.替代高分辨率 HLA 分型的 HLA 抗原推测:多民族人群的评估及其对移植中临床决策的影响。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Jan;21(1):344-352. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16070. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
10
Different eplet software programs give discordant and incorrect results: An analysis of HLAMatchmaker vs Fusion Matchmaker Eplet calling software.不同的表位软件程序给出不一致且错误的结果:HLAMatchmaker与Fusion Matchmaker表位调用软件的分析
HLA. 2020 Jul;96(1):52-63. doi: 10.1111/tan.13897. Epub 2020 Apr 26.