Diagnostic and Neurological Processing Research Laboratory, Biomedical Engineering Program, University of Manitoba, Riverview Health Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2022 Mar;60(3):797-810. doi: 10.1007/s11517-022-02507-1. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) from AD with cerebrovascular disease pathology (AD-CVD) is a rising challenge. Using electrovestibulography (EVestG) measured signals, we develop an automated feature extraction and selection algorithm for an unbiased identification of AD and AD-CVD from healthy controls as well as their separation from each other. EVestG signals of 24 healthy controls, 16 individuals with AD, and 13 with AD-CVD were analyzed within two separate groupings: One-versus-One and One-versus-All. A multistage feature selection process was conducted over the training dataset using linear support vector machine (SVM) classification with 10-fold cross-validation, k nearest neighbors/averaging imputation, and exhaustive search. The most frequently selected features that achieved highest classification performance were selected. 10-fold cross-validation was applied via a linear SVM classification on the entire dataset. Multivariate analysis was run to test the between population differences while controlling for the covariates. Classification accuracies of ≥ 80% and 78% were achieved for the One-versus-All classification approach and AD versus AD-CVD separation, respectively. The results also held true after controlling for the effect of covariates. AD/AD-CVD participants showed smaller/larger EVestG averaged field potential signals compared to healthy controls and AD-CVD/AD participants. These characteristics are in line with our previous study results.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)合并血管性疾病病理学(AD-CVD)的诊断是一个日益严峻的挑战。本研究使用前庭诱发肌源性电位(EVestG)测量信号,开发了一种自动特征提取和选择算法,用于从健康对照者中公正地区分 AD 和 AD-CVD,并将它们彼此区分开。分析了 24 名健康对照者、16 名 AD 患者和 13 名 AD-CVD 患者的 EVestG 信号,分为两组进行分析:一对一和一对多。使用具有 10 折交叉验证、k 最近邻/平均插补和穷举搜索的线性支持向量机(SVM)分类对训练数据集进行多阶段特征选择过程。选择最常被选中并具有最高分类性能的特征。通过线性 SVM 分类对整个数据集应用 10 折交叉验证。进行了多变量分析,以测试人群间差异,同时控制协变量的影响。对于一对多分类方法,分类准确率≥80%,对于 AD 与 AD-CVD 的分离,分类准确率≥78%。在控制协变量的影响后,结果仍然成立。AD/AD-CVD 参与者的 EVestG 平均场电位信号小于/大于健康对照者和 AD-CVD/AD 参与者。这些特征与我们之前的研究结果一致。