Suppr超能文献

对于患有脑血管疾病的阿尔茨海默病患者,表面与穿透性重复经颅磁刺激可能更有效。

Surface Versus Penetrative rTMS Stimulation May Be More Effective for AD Patients with Cerebrovascular Disease.

作者信息

Lithgow Brian J, Saha Chandan, Dastgheib Zeinab, Moussavi Zahra

机构信息

Biomedical Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Neurosci Insights. 2025 Mar 25;20:26331055251328355. doi: 10.1177/26331055251328355. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) has been applied as an investigational therapy for Alzheimer's Disease (AD). The recent largest (N = 135) double-blind study with 6 months post-treatment follow-up investigating rTMS efficacy as a treatment for AD found about 72% of participants in each group of active and sham were positively responsive to rTMS (using Magstim AirFilm active and sham coils). Since the used sham coil produced about 25.3% of the peak active stimulus, it was hypothesized it could evoke a measurable response in AD patients. This study looks at the details of the above study's sham responses to determine why and how such a response might occur and how cerebrovascular symptomatology may have impacted that response. In the above-mentioned study, 90 and 45 patients were randomly assigned to active and sham groups, respectively. Those with modified Hachinski Ischemic Scores (HIS) below and above 2 were labeled AD and ADcvd, respectively. Analysis of the primary outcome measure ADAS-Cog score change from baseline to post-treatment and follow-ups showed the ADcvd in the sham group had a significantly ( = .034) greater improvement or less decline at post-treatment and follow-up sessions compared to the ADcvd in the active group. Additionally, the improvement of the ADcvd sham compared to those in the active group persisted longer. Also, there was a significant ( = .036) improvement for AD individuals in the active compared to AD sham stimulation group at 2-months post-treatment. Overall, the sham rTMS stimulus did evoke a measurable response which was more effective for ADcvd in sham than ADcvd in active support of a vascular mechanism likely linked to the shallower sham stimulus penetration.

摘要

重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)已被用作治疗阿尔茨海默病(AD)的一种研究性疗法。最近一项规模最大(N = 135)的双盲研究,对rTMS作为AD治疗方法的疗效进行了6个月的治疗后随访,发现每组接受真刺激和假刺激的参与者中约72%对rTMS有阳性反应(使用Magstim AirFilm真刺激和假刺激线圈)。由于使用的假刺激线圈产生的峰值真刺激约为25.3%,因此推测它可能会在AD患者中引发可测量的反应。本研究着眼于上述研究中假刺激反应的细节,以确定这种反应为何以及如何发生,以及脑血管症状可能如何影响了这种反应。在上述研究中,90名和45名患者分别被随机分配到真刺激组和假刺激组。改良哈金斯基缺血评分(HIS)低于2分和高于2分的患者分别被标记为AD和ADcvd。对主要结局指标从基线到治疗后及随访时的ADAS - Cog评分变化进行分析,结果显示,与真刺激组的ADcvd相比,假刺激组的ADcvd在治疗后和随访时改善更显著(P = 0.034)或下降更少。此外,与真刺激组相比,假刺激组ADcvd的改善持续时间更长。另外,在治疗后2个月时,真刺激组的AD个体与假刺激组相比有显著(P = 0.036)改善。总体而言,假rTMS刺激确实引发了可测量的反应,对于假刺激组中的ADcvd比真刺激组中的ADcvd更有效,这支持了一种可能与假刺激穿透较浅相关的血管机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4cf/11938491/83d98d5b8cfa/10.1177_26331055251328355-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验