Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2022 Aug;14(3):757-775. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12345. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
The increasing development of resistant pathogens is one of the greatest global health challenges. As antibiotic overuse amplifies antibiotic resistance, antibiotic intake poses a social dilemma in which individuals need to decide whether to prosocially reduce their intake in the collective interest versus to (over)use it even in case of mild diseases. We devise a novel behavioral game paradigm to model the social dilemma of antibiotic intake. Using this new method in an incentivized laboratory experiment (N = 272 German participants), we varied whether players had mutual knowledge about their antibiotic intake. The results indicate that there was substantial antibiotic overuse in the absence of social information. Overuse decreased when social information was present. Our postexperimental survey data further suggest that social information impacts people's behavioral motivation, evaluation of the other player, and positive affect. Taken together, providing social information about people's antibiotic intake may help in reducing antibiotic overuse. On a more general level, the novel behavioral game may be adapted to study other aspects of antibiotic intake to promote prudent use of antibiotics.
耐药病原体的不断发展是全球健康面临的最大挑战之一。由于抗生素的过度使用加剧了抗生素耐药性,抗生素的摄入在个人层面上构成了一个社会困境,即个人需要在集体利益的前提下决定是否减少利他性的抗生素摄入,还是即使在轻度疾病的情况下也过度使用抗生素。我们设计了一种新的行为博弈范式来模拟抗生素摄入的社会困境。我们在一个有激励的实验室实验中使用这种新方法(N=272 名德国参与者),并改变了参与者是否相互了解抗生素摄入情况。结果表明,在没有社会信息的情况下,抗生素的过度使用非常严重。当存在社会信息时,过度使用的情况会减少。我们的实验后调查数据进一步表明,社会信息会影响人们的行为动机、对其他参与者的评价和积极情绪。总的来说,提供关于人们抗生素摄入的社会信息可能有助于减少抗生素的过度使用。在更广泛的层面上,这种新的行为博弈可以被用来研究抗生素摄入的其他方面,以促进谨慎使用抗生素。