• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胆囊炎:磁共振成像检测

Cholecystitis: detection with MR imaging.

作者信息

McCarthy S, Hricak H, Cohen M, Fisher M R, Winkler M L, Filly R A, Margulis A R

出版信息

Radiology. 1986 Feb;158(2):333-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.158.2.3510441.

DOI:10.1148/radiology.158.2.3510441
PMID:3510441
Abstract

The role of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the detection of gallbladder disease was evaluated in 39 individuals (16 healthy, five with asymptomatic gallstones, and 18 with clinical symptoms of gallbladder disease). MR imaging was performed after they fasted for 12 hours. Imaging sequences included a combination of repetition times (TR) of 0.5 and 1.5 sec and echo times (TE) of 28 and 56 msec. On the images obtained at TR = 0.5 sec and TE = 56 msec, gallbladder bile was hyperintense compared with the liver in all healthy and asymptomatic subjects and was hypointense (n = 9), isointense (n = 4), or hyperintense (n = 5) in symptomatic patients, eight of whom had surgical confirmation of cholecystitis. Comparison of normal versus pathologically proved cases for the presence of gallbladder disease yielded a specificity of 100%, sensitivity of 75%, and a significant difference of P less than .01. Thus, with a pulse sequence of TR = 0.5 sec and TE = 56 msec, MR was sensitive in detecting gallbladder disease. However, the role of MR in the radiologic workup of gallbladder disease will be determined by more experience with this modality.

摘要

对39例个体(16例健康者、5例无症状胆结石患者以及18例有胆囊疾病临床症状者)评估了磁共振(MR)成像在胆囊疾病检测中的作用。在他们禁食12小时后进行MR成像。成像序列包括重复时间(TR)为0.5秒和1.5秒以及回波时间(TE)为28毫秒和56毫秒的组合。在TR = 0.5秒和TE = 56毫秒获得的图像上,在所有健康和无症状受试者中,胆囊胆汁相对于肝脏呈高信号,而在有症状患者中呈低信号(n = 9)、等信号(n = 4)或高信号(n = 5),其中8例经手术证实为胆囊炎。比较正常与经病理证实的胆囊疾病病例,特异性为100%,敏感性为75%,且P值小于0.01,差异有统计学意义。因此,采用TR = 0.5秒和TE = 56毫秒的脉冲序列时,MR对检测胆囊疾病很敏感。然而,MR在胆囊疾病影像学检查中的作用将取决于对这种检查方式的更多经验。

相似文献

1
Cholecystitis: detection with MR imaging.胆囊炎:磁共振成像检测
Radiology. 1986 Feb;158(2):333-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.158.2.3510441.
2
Gallbladder bile in cholecystitis: in vitro MR evaluation.胆囊炎患者胆囊胆汁的体外磁共振评估
Radiology. 1985 Nov;157(2):457-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.157.2.4048455.
3
Gallbladder bile: an experimental study in dogs using MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopy.
Radiology. 1985 Nov;157(2):453-5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.157.2.2996051.
4
Gallbladder stones: imaging and intervention.胆囊结石:影像学与干预措施
Radiographics. 2000 May-Jun;20(3):751-66. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.20.3.g00ma16751.
5
Hepatic metastases studied with MR and CT.采用磁共振成像(MR)和计算机断层扫描(CT)研究肝转移瘤。
Radiology. 1985 Aug;156(2):423-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.156.2.4011905.
6
Two-second MR images: comparison with spin-echo images in 29 patients.两秒磁共振图像:与29例患者的自旋回波图像比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Mar;148(3):629-33. doi: 10.2214/ajr.148.3.629.
7
MR imaging of the dilated biliary tract.
Radiology. 1986 Feb;158(2):337-41. doi: 10.1148/radiology.158.2.3941860.
8
Optimal pulse sequence for imaging hepatic metastases.用于肝脏转移瘤成像的最佳脉冲序列。
Radiology. 1986 Dec;161(3):727-34. doi: 10.1148/radiology.161.3.3786723.
9
[Differential ultrasound diagnosis of the healthy, inflamed and diseased gallbladder].
Zentralbl Chir. 1990;115(6):341-6.
10
Echoplanar MR imaging of the liver in patients with focal hepatic lesions: quantitative analysis of images made with various pulse sequences.局灶性肝病变患者肝脏的回波平面磁共振成像:不同脉冲序列图像的定量分析
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Dec;163(6):1389-93. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.6.7992735.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative study usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis.
J Gastroenterol. 1994 Apr;29(2):192-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02358682.
2
High-field MRI of primary gallbladder carcinoma.原发性胆囊癌的高场强磁共振成像
Gastrointest Radiol. 1988;13(2):142-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01889043.