Packer M, Medina N, Yushak M
Am J Med Sci. 1986 Jan;291(1):8-15. doi: 10.1097/00000441-198601000-00003.
To compare the responses to oral inotropic and vasodilator drugs, maximally effective doses of amrinone (300 mg over 3 hours) and captopril (25 mg orally) were administered to 21 patients with severe chronic heart failure, who had not received either agent previously. Despite similar decreases in systemic vascular resistance with both drugs, amrinone produced greater increases in cardiac index (+ 0.56 vs. + 0.41/min/m2, p less than 0.05) and smaller decreases in mean arterial pressure (-11.1 vs. -15.2 mm Hg, p less than 0.05) than did captopril; three patients became symptomatically hypotensive with captopril, but none did so after amrinone. These differences were due to a significant decrease in heart rate with captopril (-6.3 beats/min, p less than 0.01), whereas heart rate increased with amrinone (+ 4.3 beats/min, p less than 0.01); the increases in stroke volume index with both drugs were similar. Despite similar decreases in left ventricular filling pressures, the decrease in mean right atrial pressure with amrinone was greater than with captopril (-5.6 vs. -3.2 mm Hg, p less than 0.01). This difference was the result of the greater decrease in pulmonary arteriolar resistance, and hence in right ventricular afterload, with amrinone than with captopril, (-33% vs. -16%, respectively), p less than 0.01. Despite these superior hemodynamic responses to amrinone, when patients received sequential long-term treatment with both drugs during the follow-up period, only 12% of patients benefitted during therapy with amrinone, whereas 64% improved clinically with captopril.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
为比较口服正性肌力药和血管扩张剂的疗效,对21例重度慢性心力衰竭患者给予氨力农(3小时内静脉注射300毫克)和卡托普利(口服25毫克)的最大有效剂量,这些患者此前均未使用过这两种药物。尽管两种药物使体循环血管阻力均有相似程度的下降,但氨力农使心脏指数增加幅度更大(分别为+0.56与+0.41/分钟/平方米,p<0.05),平均动脉压下降幅度更小(-11.1与-15.2毫米汞柱,p<0.05);3例患者使用卡托普利后出现症状性低血压,而使用氨力农后无此情况。这些差异是由于卡托普利使心率显著下降(-6.3次/分钟,p<0.01),而氨力农使心率增加(+4.3次/分钟,p<0.01);两种药物使每搏量指数的增加相似。尽管左心室充盈压下降程度相似,但氨力农使平均右心房压下降幅度大于卡托普利(-5.6与-3.2毫米汞柱,p<0.01)。这种差异是由于氨力农使肺小动脉阻力下降幅度大于卡托普利,进而使右心室后负荷下降幅度更大(分别为-33%与-16%),p<0.01。尽管氨力农在血流动力学反应方面表现更优,但在随访期间患者先后接受两种药物的长期治疗时,仅12%的患者在使用氨力农治疗期间获益,而64%的患者使用卡托普利后临床症状改善。(摘要截选至250字)