Reed R L, Ciavarella D, Heimbach D M, Baron L, Pavlin E, Counts R B, Carrico C J
Ann Surg. 1986 Jan;203(1):40-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198601000-00008.
Prior studies at Harborview Medical Center have suggested that dilutional thrombocytopenia is a major etiology of microvascular, nonmechanical bleeding (MVB). We undertook a prospective randomized double-blind clinical study to compare the prophylactic effects of 6 units of platelet concentrates (PLT) versus 2 units of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) administered with every 12 units of modified whole blood in patients undergoing massive transfusion (12 or more units in 12 hours). After exclusions, three of 17 patients who received PLT and three of 16 patients who received FFP developed MVB, an incidence no different from our previous findings. Regression lines of platelet counts during transfusion were no different between groups, and both groups had higher platelet counts than predicted from a standard washout equation. Only one patient had evidence of dilutional thrombocytopenia as a cause for MVB. Prophylactic platelet administration is not warranted as a routine measure to prevent MVB.
哈博维尤医疗中心之前的研究表明,稀释性血小板减少是微血管非机械性出血(MVB)的主要病因。我们进行了一项前瞻性随机双盲临床研究,以比较在大量输血(12小时内输注12单位或更多单位)的患者中,每输注12单位改良全血时输注6单位血小板浓缩液(PLT)与输注2单位新鲜冰冻血浆(FFP)的预防效果。排除相关病例后,接受PLT的17例患者中有3例发生MVB,接受FFP的16例患者中有3例发生MVB,这一发生率与我们之前的研究结果无异。两组输血期间血小板计数的回归线无差异,且两组的血小板计数均高于根据标准清除方程预测的数值。只有1例患者有证据表明稀释性血小板减少是MVB的病因。预防性输注血小板作为预防MVB的常规措施并无必要。