• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于病例模拟会议改编的现场模拟培训的实施:对不良事件发生的影响-一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。

Implementation of an in situ simulation-based training adapted from Morbidity and Mortality conference cases: effect on the occurrence of adverse events-study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Departments of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospices Civils of Lyon, Lyon, France.

Centre Lyonnais d'Enseignement par Simulation en Santé (CLESS, high fidelity medical simulation center), SAMSEI, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Trials. 2022 Feb 2;23(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06040-2.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-022-06040-2
PMID:35109900
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8812171/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Morbidity and Mortality conference provides the necessary improvement measures for patient safety. However, they are an underused resource mainly because the conclusions to be drawn from the discussion and their implications for practice are not always well integrated by inpatient care teams. We therefore propose in this study two interventions to optimise their effectiveness: a passive feedback with wide dissemination by e-mail and/or on paper of the results of the Morbidity and Mortality conference to inpatient care teams and an active feedback with in situ inter-professional simulation-training programme in which scenarios will be based on cases studied in Morbidity and Mortality conference. In the present study, we hypothesise that the greatest reduction the occurrence of adverse event will be in the active feedback arm.

METHODS

A cluster randomised controlled study will be performed at four study sites. The unit of randomisation is wards within the study sites. Fifteen wards will be randomly assigned to passive feedback, active feedback, or a standard MMC (control arm). Passive feedback and active feedback arms will be compared to standard arm in terms of occurrence of adverse events. The trigger tool methodology used to identify adverse events is a retrospective review of inpatient records using "triggers": an adverse event is defined as a patient's stay with at least one positive trigger.

DISCUSSION

The in situ simulation training based on cases processed in Morbidity and Mortality conference is built according to the main topics identified for the successful implementation of healthcare simulation in patient safety programmes: technical skills, nontechnical skills, assessment, effectiveness, and system probing. The in situ simulation-training programme conducted as part of the study has the potential to improve patient safety during hospitalisation. We therefore expect the greatest reduction in the occurrence of adverse events in patients hospitalised in the active feedback arm. This expected result would have a direct impact on patient safety and would place in situ simulation at the highest level of the Kirkpatrick model.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02771613. Registered on May 12, 2016. All items from the WHO Trial Registration Data Set can be found within the protocol.

摘要

背景

发病率和死亡率会议为患者安全提供了必要的改进措施。然而,它们是一种未充分利用的资源,主要是因为讨论得出的结论及其对实践的影响并不总是被住院护理团队很好地整合。因此,我们在这项研究中提出了两种干预措施来优化其效果:通过电子邮件和/或纸质形式向住院护理团队广泛传播被动反馈,将发病率和死亡率会议的结果广泛传播,并进行现场跨专业模拟培训计划的主动反馈,其中情景将基于发病率和死亡率会议中研究的病例。在本研究中,我们假设主动反馈组不良事件的发生率将降低最大。

方法

将在四个研究地点进行一项集群随机对照研究。随机分组的单位是研究地点内的病房。将 15 个病房随机分配到被动反馈、主动反馈或标准 MMC(对照组)中。将被动反馈和主动反馈臂与标准臂进行比较,以评估不良事件的发生情况。用于识别不良事件的触发工具方法是使用“触发器”回顾性审查住院病历:一个不良事件被定义为患者的住院时间至少有一个阳性触发器。

讨论

基于发病率和死亡率会议处理的病例构建的现场模拟培训是根据成功实施医疗保健模拟在患者安全计划中的主要主题构建的:技术技能、非技术技能、评估、有效性和系统探测。作为研究一部分进行的现场模拟培训计划有可能提高住院期间患者的安全性。因此,我们预计在主动反馈臂住院的患者中不良事件的发生率将降低最大。这一预期结果将直接影响患者的安全,并将现场模拟置于柯克帕特里克模型的最高水平。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02771613。于 2016 年 5 月 12 日注册。WHO 试验注册数据集的所有项目都可以在方案中找到。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aaa/8812171/6fa99ea059e3/13063_2022_6040_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aaa/8812171/2ecb5642df0d/13063_2022_6040_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aaa/8812171/55555f5379b2/13063_2022_6040_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aaa/8812171/6fa99ea059e3/13063_2022_6040_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aaa/8812171/2ecb5642df0d/13063_2022_6040_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aaa/8812171/55555f5379b2/13063_2022_6040_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aaa/8812171/6fa99ea059e3/13063_2022_6040_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation of an in situ simulation-based training adapted from Morbidity and Mortality conference cases: effect on the occurrence of adverse events-study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial.基于病例模拟会议改编的现场模拟培训的实施:对不良事件发生的影响-一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Feb 2;23(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06040-2.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
4
Piloting and evaluating feasibility of a training program to improve patient safety for inter-professional inpatient care teams - study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial.试行和评估一项培训计划的可行性,以提高跨专业住院护理团队的患者安全 - 一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Jun 28;20(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3448-7.
5
Randomised controlled trial comparing efficacy and safety of high versus low Low-Molecular Weight Heparin dosages in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and coagulopathy not requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (COVID-19 HD): a structured summary of a study protocol.随机对照试验比较高剂量与低剂量低分子肝素在需要侵入性机械通气的严重 COVID-19 肺炎和凝血病住院患者中的疗效和安全性 (COVID-19 HD):研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jun 26;21(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04475-z.
6
A Phase I/II Clinical Trial to evaluate the efficacy of baricitinib to prevent respiratory insufficiency progression in onco-hematological patients affected with COVID19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项评估巴瑞替尼预防 COVID19 相关血液肿瘤患者呼吸功能不全进展的疗效的 I/II 期临床试验:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Feb 5;22(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05072-4.
7
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
8
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (inactivated, Vero cell): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项评估 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗(灭活,Vero 细胞)有效性和安全性的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照 III 期临床试验:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 13;22(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05180-1.
9
10
Effect of dexamethasone in patients with ARDS and COVID-19 - prospective, multi-centre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (REMED trial): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.地塞米松治疗 ARDS 合并 COVID-19 患者的效果 - 一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、平行组、随机对照试验(REMED 试验):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Mar 1;22(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05116-9.

本文引用的文献

1
In situ simulation and its effects on patient outcomes: a systematic review.原位模拟及其对患者预后的影响:一项系统综述
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2019 Dec 24;6(1):3-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000387. eCollection 2020.
2
Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis.医疗保健环境中可预防的患者伤害的发生率、严重程度和性质:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Jul 17;366:l4185. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4185.
3
Filling the Gap: Simulation-based Crisis Resource Management Training for Emergency Medicine Residents.
填补空白:基于模拟的急诊住院医师危机资源管理培训。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;19(1):205-210. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.10.35284. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
4
Morbidity and Mortality Conferences: A Narrative Review of Strategies to Prioritize Quality Improvement.发病率与死亡率研讨会:关于优先开展质量改进策略的叙述性综述
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016 Nov;42(11):516-527. doi: 10.1016/S1553-7250(16)42094-5. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
5
Medical morbidity and mortality conferences: past, present and future.医学发病率与死亡率研讨会:过去、现在与未来
Postgrad Med J. 2017 Mar;93(1097):148-152. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134103. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
6
Five Topics Health Care Simulation Can Address to Improve Patient Safety: Results From a Consensus Process.医疗模拟可改善患者安全的五个主题:共识过程的结果。
J Patient Saf. 2019 Jun;15(2):111-120. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000254.
7
Mortality meetings in geriatric medicine: strategies for improvement.老年医学中的死亡病例讨论会:改进策略
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 Mar 17;4(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u202625.w3247. eCollection 2015.
8
Transforming the Morbidity and Mortality Conference to Promote Safety and Quality in a PICU.转变危重症监护病房的发病率和死亡率会议以促进安全与质量
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan;17(1):58-66. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000539.
9
The Morbidity and Mortality Conference in Pediatric Intensive Care as a Means for Improving Patient Safety.儿科重症监护中的发病率和死亡率会议作为提高患者安全的一种手段。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan;17(1):67-72. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000550.
10
Transfer of learning and patient outcome in simulated crisis resource management: a systematic review.模拟危机资源管理中的学习迁移与患者结局:一项系统评价
Can J Anaesth. 2014 Jun;61(6):571-82. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0143-8. Epub 2014 Mar 25.