Suppr超能文献

超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞与骶管阻滞用于小儿腹股沟疝修补术后镇痛的比较研究

Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block versus caudal block for postoperative analgesia in children undergoing inguinal hernia surgery: A comparative study.

作者信息

Kumar Amit, Dogra Neelam, Gupta Anupama, Aggarwal Swati

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

出版信息

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Apr-Jun;36(2):172-176. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_100_19. Epub 2020 Jun 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Ultrasound-guided (USG) transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has emerged as a safe and effective regional anesthesia technique as it provides adequate postoperative pain relief for lower abdominal surgeries. Caudal block is a gold standard technique in pediatric surgeries. Our aim was to compare the duration of postoperative analgesia between TAP block and caudal block in children undergoing inguinal hernia surgeries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, controlled study, 112 children of age 2-8 years and ASA grade I and II, undergoing elective inguinal hernia surgery were randomly allocated into two groups: Group T ( = 56) received USG-guided TAP block with 0.5mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine and Group C ( = 56) received caudal block with 1mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine. The primary outcome variable was the duration of postoperative analgesia and the secondary outcome variables included variation in hemodynamic parameters and adverse effects, if any.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in median of CHEOPS score till 5 postoperative hours, thereafter till 24 postoperative hours, significantly lower CHEOPS score were found in Group T. Mean duration of analgesia was 523.44 ± 61.30 min in Group T, whereas in Group C, it was 352.59 ± 32.54 min. No significant difference was observed in hemodynamic variations and adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

TAP block and caudal block both are effective in providing postoperative analgesia in children undergoing inguinal herniotomy. USG-guided TAP block was found to be superior as it provided longer duration of analgesia and reduced rescue analgesic dose without any significant adverse effects as compared with caudal block after inguinal herniotomy.

摘要

背景与目的

超声引导下的腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞已成为一种安全有效的区域麻醉技术,因为它能为下腹部手术提供充分的术后疼痛缓解。骶管阻滞是小儿外科手术的金标准技术。我们的目的是比较腹股沟疝修补手术患儿中TAP阻滞和骶管阻滞的术后镇痛时间。

材料与方法

在一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究中,112例年龄2 - 8岁、ASA分级为I级和II级、接受择期腹股沟疝修补手术的患儿被随机分为两组:T组(n = 56)接受0.5mL/kg的0.2%罗哌卡因超声引导下TAP阻滞,C组(n = 56)接受1mL/kg的0.2%罗哌卡因骶管阻滞。主要结局变量是术后镇痛时间,次要结局变量包括血流动力学参数变化和不良反应(如有)。

结果

术后5小时内CHEOPS评分中位数无显著差异,此后直至术后24小时,T组CHEOPS评分显著更低。T组平均镇痛时间为523.44 ± 61.30分钟,而C组为352.59 ± 32.54分钟。血流动力学变化和不良反应方面未观察到显著差异。

结论

TAP阻滞和骶管阻滞在为腹股沟疝修补手术患儿提供术后镇痛方面均有效。发现超声引导下TAP阻滞更优,因为与腹股沟疝修补术后的骶管阻滞相比,它提供了更长的镇痛时间并减少了补救镇痛剂量,且无任何显著不良反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1f6/7480308/78c96c8d11d6/JOACP-36-172-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验