School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Jun;29(3):954-970. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02049-x. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
The insight experience (or 'Aha moment') generally evokes strong feelings of certainty and confidence. An 'Aha' experience for a false idea could underlie many false beliefs and delusions. However, for as long as insight experiences have been studied, false insights have remained difficult to elicit experimentally. That difficulty, in turn, highlights the fact that we know little about what causes people to experience a false insight. Across two experiments (total N = 300), we developed and tested a new paradigm to elicit false insights. In Experiment 1 we used a combination of semantic priming and visual similarity to elicit feelings of insight for incorrect solutions to anagrams. These false insights were relatively common but were experienced as weaker than correct ones. In Experiment 2 we replicated the findings of Experiment 1 and found that semantic priming and visual similarity interacted to produce false insights. These studies highlight the importance of misleading semantic processing and the feasibility of the solution in the generation of false insights.
顿悟体验(或“啊哈时刻”)通常会引发强烈的确定性和信心。错误观念的“啊哈”体验可能是许多错误信念和妄想的基础。然而,自从对顿悟体验进行研究以来,实验中仍然很难产生错误的顿悟。这种困难反过来又突出了一个事实,即我们对导致人们产生错误顿悟的原因知之甚少。在两项实验(共 300 人)中,我们开发并测试了一种新的范式来引发错误的顿悟。在实验 1 中,我们使用语义启动和视觉相似性的组合来引发对字谜错误答案的顿悟感。这些错误的顿悟相对常见,但被体验为比正确的顿悟弱。在实验 2 中,我们复制了实验 1 的发现,并发现语义启动和视觉相似性相互作用产生了错误的顿悟。这些研究强调了误导性语义处理和解决方案可行性在产生错误顿悟中的重要性。