• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How to Detect Insight Moments in Problem Solving Experiments.如何在问题解决实验中检测顿悟时刻。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 9;9:282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00282. eCollection 2018.
2
Getting a grip on insight: real-time and embodied Aha experiences predict correct solutions.把握顿悟:实时的、具身的顿悟体验预测正确的解决方案。
Cogn Emot. 2021 Aug;35(5):918-935. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1908230. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
3
Insight Is Not in the Problem: Investigating Insight in Problem Solving across Task Types.洞察力不在问题之中:跨任务类型探究问题解决中的洞察力
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 26;7:1424. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01424. eCollection 2016.
4
Intuitive Feelings of Warmth and Confidence in Insight and Noninsight Problem Solving of Magic Tricks.在魔术技巧的顿悟式与非顿悟式问题解决中对温暖和自信的直观感受
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 31;7:1314. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01314. eCollection 2016.
5
A Systematic Review of Creativity-Related Studies Applying the Remote Associates Test From 2000 to 2019.2000年至2019年应用远距离联想测验的创造力相关研究的系统评价。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 23;11:573432. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573432. eCollection 2020.
6
Feelings-of-Warmth Increase More Abruptly for Verbal Riddles Solved With in Contrast to Without Aha! Experience.与没有“啊哈!”体验相比,对于通过顿悟解决的文字谜题,温暖感的增加更为突然。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 13;9:1404. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01404. eCollection 2018.
7
What relates newspaper, definite, and clothing? An article describing deficits in convergent problem solving and creativity following hippocampal damage.报纸、定冠词和衣服之间有什么联系?一篇描述海马体损伤后在收敛性问题解决和创造力方面存在缺陷的文章。
Hippocampus. 2016 Jul;26(7):835-40. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22591. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
8
Where Does Eureka Come From? The Effect of Unreportable Hints on the Phenomenology of Insight.“尤里卡时刻”从何而来?无法报告的线索对顿悟现象学的影响。
J Intell. 2022 Nov 20;10(4):110. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10040110.
9
The dark side of Eureka: Artificially induced Aha moments make facts feel true.尤里卡效应的阴暗面:人为诱导的顿悟会让人感觉事实是真实的。
Cognition. 2020 Mar;196:104122. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104122. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
10
"The Penny Drops": Investigating Insight Through the Medium of Cryptic Crosswords.“恍然大悟”:通过隐晦填字游戏媒介探究洞察力
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 3;9:904. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00904. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Solving problems with an Aha! increases risk preference.通过顿悟来解决问题会增加风险偏好。
Think Reason. 2024;30(3):509-530. doi: 10.1080/13546783.2023.2259552. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
2
Changes in semantic memory structure support successful problem-solving and analogical transfer.语义记忆结构的变化有助于成功解决问题和进行类比迁移。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Jun 7;2(1):54. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00100-w.
3
An Integrated theory of false insights and beliefs under psychedelics.一种关于迷幻药作用下错误洞察与信念的综合理论。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Aug 1;2(1):69. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00120-6.
4
Exploring How Generating Metaphor Via Insight Versus Analysis Affects Metaphor Quality and Learning Outcomes.探索通过洞察与分析生成隐喻如何影响隐喻质量和学习成果。
Cogn Sci. 2024 Aug;48(8):e13488. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13488.
5
Progressing the Development of a Collaborative Metareasoning Framework: Prospects and Challenges.推进协作元推理框架的发展:前景与挑战。
J Intell. 2024 Mar 1;12(3):28. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12030028.
6
The Aha! experience is associated with a drop in the perceived difficulty of the problem.啊哈!体验与感知到的问题难度下降有关。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 23;15:1314531. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1314531. eCollection 2024.
7
Time course of EEG power during creative problem-solving with insight or remote thinking.具有顿悟或远程思维的创造性问题解决过程中的 EEG 功率时间历程。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Jan;45(1):e26547. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26547. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
8
Does Thinking in Opposites in Order to Think Differently Improve Creativity?为了以不同方式思考而进行反向思考是否能提高创造力?
J Intell. 2023 Apr 30;11(5):85. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11050085.
9
Where Does Eureka Come From? The Effect of Unreportable Hints on the Phenomenology of Insight.“尤里卡时刻”从何而来?无法报告的线索对顿悟现象学的影响。
J Intell. 2022 Nov 20;10(4):110. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10040110.
10
Irrelevant insights make worldviews ring true.不相关的见解使世界观听起来真实。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 8;12(1):2075. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05923-3.

本文引用的文献

1
What about False Insights? Deconstructing the Aha! Experience along Its Multiple Dimensions for Correct and Incorrect Solutions Separately.错误的顿悟呢?分别从多个维度解构正确和错误解决方案中的“啊哈!”体验。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 20;7:2077. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02077. eCollection 2016.
2
Can observing a Necker cube make you more insightful?观察内克尔立方体能否让你更具洞察力?
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Feb;48:198-211. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.11.011. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
3
Insight Is Not in the Problem: Investigating Insight in Problem Solving across Task Types.洞察力不在问题之中:跨任务类型探究问题解决中的洞察力
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 26;7:1424. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01424. eCollection 2016.
4
Insight solutions are correct more often than analytic solutions.洞察式解决方案比分析式解决方案更常是正确的。
Think Reason. 2016;22(4):443-460. doi: 10.1080/13546783.2016.1141798. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
5
Intuitive Feelings of Warmth and Confidence in Insight and Noninsight Problem Solving of Magic Tricks.在魔术技巧的顿悟式与非顿悟式问题解决中对温暖和自信的直观感受
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 31;7:1314. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01314. eCollection 2016.
6
Visceral States Call for Visceral Measures: Verbal Overshadowing of Hunger Ratings Across Assessment Modalities.内脏状态呼唤内脏措施:跨评估模式的饥饿评分的言语遮蔽。
Assessment. 2018 Mar;25(2):173-182. doi: 10.1177/1073191116645910. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
7
Sudden insight is associated with shutting out visual inputs.突然的顿悟与屏蔽视觉输入有关。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1814-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0845-0.
8
When do words hurt? A multiprocess view of the effects of verbalization on visual memory.言语何时会造成伤害?言语表达对视觉记忆影响的多过程视角。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Sep;40(5):1244-56. doi: 10.1037/a0037222. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
9
The cognitive neuroscience of insight.顿悟的认知神经科学。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:71-93. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115154.
10
Working wonders? investigating insight with magic tricks.创造奇迹?用魔术探究洞察力。
Cognition. 2014 Feb;130(2):174-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Dec 1.

如何在问题解决实验中检测顿悟时刻。

How to Detect Insight Moments in Problem Solving Experiments.

作者信息

Laukkonen Ruben E, Tangen Jason M

机构信息

School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 9;9:282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00282. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00282
PMID:29593598
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5854655/
Abstract

Arguably, it is not possible to study insight moments during problem solving without being able to accurately detect when they occur (Bowden and Jung-Beeman, 2007). Despite over a century of research on the insight moment, there is surprisingly little consensus on the best way to measure them in real-time experiments. There have also been no attempts to evaluate whether the different ways of measuring insight converge. Indeed, if it turns out that the popular measures of insight , then this may indicate that researchers who have used one method may have been measuring a different phenomenon to those who have used another method. We compare the strengths and weaknesses of the two most commonly cited ways of measuring insight: The feelings-of-warmth measure adapted from Metcalfe and Wiebe (1987), and the self-report measure adapted from Bowden and Jung-Beeman (2007). We find little empirical agreement between the two measures, and conclude that the self-report measure of Aha! is superior both methodologically and theoretically, and provides a better representation of what is commonly regarded as insight. We go on to describe and recommend a novel measure of insight using a dynamometer as described in Creswell et al. (2016).

摘要

可以说,如果无法准确检测到顿悟时刻何时发生,就不可能在解决问题的过程中研究顿悟时刻(鲍登和荣格 - 比曼,2007)。尽管对顿悟时刻进行了一个多世纪的研究,但在实时实验中测量它们的最佳方法上,令人惊讶的是几乎没有共识。也没有人尝试评估测量顿悟的不同方法是否趋同。事实上,如果事实证明流行的顿悟测量方法不同,那么这可能表明使用一种方法的研究人员所测量的现象与使用另一种方法的研究人员所测量的现象不同。我们比较了两种最常被引用的测量顿悟方法的优缺点:改编自梅特卡夫和威伯(1987)的温暖感测量方法,以及改编自鲍登和荣格 - 比曼(2007)的自我报告测量方法。我们发现这两种测量方法之间几乎没有实证上的一致性,并得出结论,“啊哈!”的自我报告测量方法在方法论和理论上都更优越,并且能更好地体现通常被视为顿悟的内容。我们接着描述并推荐一种如克雷斯韦尔等人(2016)所述的使用测力计的新颖顿悟测量方法。