Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2022 Apr;82(2):85-89. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2022.2034035. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
Capillary electrophoresis is a method with a long history of developments which enables monitoring of several pathological processes and has an irreplaceable role in screening for presence of M-protein. The aim of this study was to assess analytical performance of Sebia and Helena systems, as well as their screening efficiency for M-protein by identifying characteristic electrophoretic pattern abnormalities. The controls were analyzed in triplicate over a five-day period. Comparability testing was performed on 46 (Capillarys3Octa) and 49 (V8Nexus) serum samples with routinely used Capillarys2. Electropherograms (EPGs) were reviewed by two specialists independently to select samples for further processing by immunofixation. All precision test results met the eligibility criteria by Ricos et al. The correlation coefficients higher than 0.8 indicated excellent comparability although the results were slightly more comparable among the same manufacturer systems. There were no variations in observed abnormalities in EPGs when Capillarys systems were compared, but a disparity was detected in 11/49 EPGs on comparing Capillarys2 and V8Nexus. The cause of the detected difference could be in a different graphical presentation of the findings and in a lesser resolution of the applied buffer. The impression is that the V8Nexus system combined with the utilized buffer provides greater resolution in the alpha-1 and alpha-2 globulin fractions, but that it declines in the gamma globulin fraction. The precision and estimated accuracy criteria were met by both systems. Comparison results implied that capillary systems are not equally effective in M-protein screening, highlighting the necessity to include system screening efficiency in analytical evaluation.
毛细管电泳是一种发展历史悠久的方法,能够监测多种病理过程,在 M 蛋白筛查中具有不可替代的作用。本研究旨在评估 Sebia 和 Helena 系统的分析性能及其通过识别特征电泳模式异常进行 M 蛋白筛查的效率。在五天的时间里对三个对照品进行了重复分析。对 46 个(Capillarys3Octa)和 49 个(V8Nexus)血清样本进行了可比性测试,这些样本通常使用 Capillarys2 进行检测。两名专家独立审查电泳图谱(EPG),以选择进一步进行免疫固定的样本。所有精密度测试结果均符合 Ricos 等人的合格标准。相关性系数高于 0.8 表明具有极好的可比性,尽管同一制造商系统的结果更具可比性。当比较毛细管系统时,EPG 中观察到的异常没有变化,但在将 Capillarys2 和 V8Nexus 进行比较时,在 49 个 EPG 中有 11 个存在差异。检测到差异的原因可能是在不同的发现图形表示和应用缓冲液的分辨率较低。结果表明,V8Nexus 系统与所用缓冲液结合可在α-1 和α-2 球蛋白部分提供更高的分辨率,但在γ球蛋白部分分辨率降低。两个系统都符合精密度和估计准确性标准。比较结果表明,毛细管系统在 M 蛋白筛查中的效果并不相同,这突出了在分析评估中必须包括系统筛查效率。