Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas, Dallas, Texas.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2022 Mar 1;132(3):632-640. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00786.2021. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with cardiopulmonary abnormalities that may increase physiological dead space to tidal volume (VD/VT) during exercise. However, studies have not corrected VD/VT for apparatus mechanical dead space (VDM), which may confound the accurate calculation of VD/VT. We evaluated whether calculating physiological dead space with (VD/VT) and without (VD/VT) correcting for VDM impacts the interpretation of gas exchange efficiency during exercise in HFpEF. Fifteen HFpEF (age: 69 ± 6 yr; V̇o: 1.34 ± 0.45 L/min) and 12 controls (70 ± 3 yr; V̇o: 1.70 ± 0.51 L/min) were studied. Pulmonary gas exchange and arterial blood gases were analyzed at rest, submaximal (20 W for HFpEF and 40 W for controls), and peak exercise. VD/VT was calculated as [Formula: see text] - [Formula: see text]/[Formula: see text]. VD/VT was calculated as [Formula: see text] - [Formula: see text]/[Formula: see text] - VDM/VT. VD/VT decreased from rest (HFpEF: 0.54 ± 0.07; controls: 0.32 ± 0.07) to submaximal exercise (HFpEF: 0.46 ± 0.07; controls: 0.25 ± 0.06) in both groups ( < 0.05), but remained stable ( > 0.05) thereafter to peak exercise (HFpEF: 0.46 ± 0.09; controls: 0.22 ± 0.05). In HFpEF, VD/VT did not change ( = 0.58) from rest (0.29 ± 0.07) to submaximal exercise (0.29 ± 0.06), but increased ( = 0.02) thereafter to peak exercise (0.33 ± 0.06). In controls, VD/VT remained stable such that no change was observed ( > 0.05) from rest (0.17 ± 0.06) to submaximal exercise (0.14 ± 0.06), or thereafter to peak exercise (0.14 ± 0.05). Calculating physiological dead space with and without a VDM correction yields quantitively and qualitatively different results, which could have impact on the interpretation of gas exchange efficiency in HFpEF. Further investigation is required to uncover the clinical consequences and the mechanism(s) explaining the increase in VD/VT during exercise in HFpEF. Calculating VD/VT with and without correcting for VDM yields quantitively and qualitatively different results, which could have an important impact on the interpretation of V/Q mismatch in HFpEF. The finding that V/Q mismatch and gas exchange efficiency worsened, as reflected by an increase in VD/VT during exercise, has not been previously demonstrated in HFpEF. Thus, further studies are needed to investigate the mechanisms explaining the increase in VD/VT during exercise in patients with HFpEF.
射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)与心肺异常相关,这些异常可能会在运动期间增加生理死腔与潮气量(VD/VT)的比值。然而,目前的研究并未对死腔与潮气容积(VD/VT)进行装置机械死腔(VDM)校正,这可能会混淆 VD/VT 的准确计算。我们评估了在 HFpEF 中,使用(VD/VT)和不使用(VD/VT)校正 VDM 计算生理死腔是否会影响运动期间气体交换效率的解释。研究了 15 例 HFpEF(年龄:69±6 岁;V̇o:1.34±0.45 L/min)和 12 例对照(70±3 岁;V̇o:1.70±0.51 L/min)。在休息、亚极量(HFpEF 为 20 W,对照为 40 W)和峰值运动时分析了肺气体交换和动脉血气。VD/VT 计算如下:[公式:见文本]-[公式:见文本]/[公式:见文本]。VD/VT 计算如下:[公式:见文本]-[公式:见文本]/[公式:见文本]-VDM/VT。VD/VT 从休息(HFpEF:0.54±0.07;对照:0.32±0.07)下降到亚极量运动(HFpEF:0.46±0.07;对照:0.25±0.06),两组均 <0.05,但此后保持稳定(>0.05),直到峰值运动(HFpEF:0.46±0.09;对照:0.22±0.05)。在 HFpEF 中,VD/VT 没有变化(=0.58),从休息(0.29±0.07)到亚极量运动(0.29±0.06),但此后增加(=0.02),直到峰值运动(0.33±0.06)。在对照中,VD/VT 保持稳定,因此,从休息(0.17±0.06)到亚极量运动(0.14±0.06)或此后到峰值运动(0.14±0.05),没有观察到变化(>0.05)。使用和不使用 VDM 校正计算生理死腔会产生定量和定性不同的结果,这可能会对 HFpEF 中气体交换效率的解释产生重要影响。需要进一步研究以揭示在 HFpEF 中运动时 VD/VT 增加的临床后果和机制。使用和不校正 VDM 计算 VD/VT 会产生定量和定性不同的结果,这可能会对 HFpEF 中的 V/Q 不匹配的解释产生重要影响。在 HFpEF 中,以前没有证明运动期间 V/Q 不匹配和气体交换效率恶化,表现为 VD/VT 增加。因此,需要进一步研究以探讨解释 HFpEF 患者运动期间 VD/VT 增加的机制。