Smith Joshua R, Olson Thomas P
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Exp Physiol. 2019 Jan;104(1):70-80. doi: 10.1113/EP087183. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
What is the central question of this study? The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of alterations in tidal volume and alveolar volume on the elevated physiological dead space and the contribution of ventilatory constraints thereof in heart failure patients during submaximal exercise. What is the main finding and its importance? We found that physiological dead space was elevated in heart failure via reduced tidal volume and alveolar volume. Furthermore, the degree of ventilatory constraints was associated with physiological dead space and alveolar volume.
Patients who have heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) exhibit impaired ventilatory efficiency [i.e. greater ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide ( ) slope] and elevated physiological dead space (V /V ). However, the impact of breathing strategy on V /V during submaximal exercise in HFrEF is unclear. The HFrEF (n = 9) and control (CTL, n = 9) participants performed constant-load cycling exercise at similar ventilation ( ). Inspiratory capacity, operating lung volumes and arterial blood gases were measured during submaximal exercise. Arterial blood gases were used to derive V /V , alveolar volume, dead space volume, alveolar ventilation and dead space ventilation. During submaximal exercise, HFrEF patients had greater slope and V /V than CTL subjects (P = 0.01). At similar , HFrEF patients had smaller tidal volumes and alveolar volumes (HFrEF 1.11 ± 0.33 litres versus CTL 1.66 ± 0.37 litres; both P ≤ 0.01), whereas dead space volume was not different (P = 0.47). The augmented breathing frequency in HFrEF patients resulted in greater dead space ventilation compared with CTL subjects (HFrEF 15 ± 4 l min versus CTL 10 ± 5 l min ; P = 0.048). The HFrEF patients exhibited greater increases in expiratory reserve volume and lower inspiratory capacity (as a percentage of predicted) than CTL subjects (both P < 0.05), which were significantly related to V /V and alveolar volume in HFrEF patients (all P < 0.03). In HFrEF, the reduced tidal volume and alveolar volume elevate physiological dead space during submaximal exercise, which is worsened in those with the greatest ventilatory constraints. These findings highlight the negative consequences of ventilatory constraints on physiological dead space during submaximal exercise in HFrEF.
本研究的核心问题是什么?本研究的目的是调查潮气量和肺泡容积的改变对心力衰竭患者次极量运动期间生理无效腔增加的影响及其通气限制的作用。主要发现及其重要性是什么?我们发现,心力衰竭患者的生理无效腔因潮气量和肺泡容积减小而增加。此外,通气限制程度与生理无效腔和肺泡容积相关。
射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者表现出通气效率受损[即二氧化碳通气当量( )斜率增大]和生理无效腔(V /V )增加。然而,HFrEF患者次极量运动期间呼吸策略对V /V 的影响尚不清楚。HFrEF组(n = 9)和对照组(CTL,n = 9)参与者在相似通气量( )下进行恒定负荷自行车运动。在次极量运动期间测量吸气容量、有效肺容积和动脉血气。用动脉血气计算V /V 、肺泡容积、无效腔容积、肺泡通气量和无效腔通气量。在次极量运动期间,HFrEF患者的 斜率和V /V 高于CTL组(P = 0.01)。在相似 时,HFrEF患者的潮气量和肺泡容积较小(HFrEF为1.11±0.33升,而CTL为1.66±0.37升;P均≤0.01),而无效腔容积无差异(P = 0.47)。与CTL组相比,HFrEF患者增加的呼吸频率导致无效腔通气量更大(HFrEF为15±4升/分钟,而CTL为10±5升/分钟;P = 0.048)。与CTL组相比,HFrEF患者的呼气储备量增加幅度更大,吸气容量(占预测值的百分比)更低(P均<0.05),这与HFrEF患者的V /V 和肺泡容积显著相关(P均<0.03)。在HFrEF患者中,次极量运动期间潮气量和肺泡容积减小会增加生理无效腔,通气限制最严重的患者情况更糟。这些发现突出了HFrEF患者次极量运动期间通气限制对生理无效腔的负面影响。