• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年对 CARIES-QC-U 的评估:一种以儿童为中心的基于偏好的龋齿测量方法。

Adolescent valuation of CARIES-QC-U: a child-centred preference-based measure of dental caries.

机构信息

School of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.

Department of Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Economics, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Feb 3;20(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01918-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-022-01918-w
PMID:35115013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8812216/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study develops an adolescent value set for a child-centred dental caries-specific measure of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) based upon CARIES-QC (Caries Impacts and Experiences Questionnaire for Children). This study develops a new approach to valuing child health by eliciting adolescent preferences and anchoring these onto the 1-0 full health-dead QALY (quality adjusted life year) scale using ordinal adult preferences.

METHODS

Two online surveys were created to elicit preferences for the CARIES-QC classification system. The first comprised best-worst scaling (BWS) tasks for completion by adolescents aged 11-16 years. The second comprised discrete choice experiment tasks with a duration attribute (DCE) for completion by adults aged over 18 years. Preferences were modelled using the conditional logit model. Mapping regressions anchored the adolescent BWS data onto the QALY scale using adult DCE values, since the BWS survey data alone cannot generate anchored values.

RESULTS

723 adolescents completed the BWS survey and 626 adults completed the DCE survey. The samples were representative of UK adolescent and adult populations. Fully consistent and robust models were produced for both BWS and DCE data. BWS preferences were mapped onto DCE values, resulting utility estimates for each health state defined by the classification system.

CONCLUSION

This is the first measure with predetermined scoring based on preferences to be developed specifically for use in child oral health research, and uses a novel technique to generate a value set using adolescent preferences. The estimates can be used to generate QALYs in economic evaluations of interventions to improve children's oral health.

摘要

目的

本研究基于 CARIES-QC(儿童龋病影响和体验问卷)为儿童为中心的龋齿特异性口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)测量方法开发青少年价值观。本研究通过青少年偏好,提出一种新的儿童健康估值方法,并使用有序成人偏好将这些偏好锚定到 1-0 全健康-死亡 QALY(质量调整生命年)量表上。

方法

设计了两个在线调查来获取 CARIES-QC 分类系统的偏好。第一个由 11-16 岁青少年完成的最佳最差标度(BWS)任务组成。第二个由年龄在 18 岁以上的成年人完成的具有持续时间属性的离散选择实验任务(DCE)组成。偏好使用条件对数模型进行建模。映射回归使用成人 DCE 值将青少年 BWS 数据锚定到 QALY 量表上,因为仅 BWS 调查数据无法生成锚定值。

结果

723 名青少年完成了 BWS 调查,626 名成年人完成了 DCE 调查。样本代表了英国青少年和成年人的人群。为 BWS 和 DCE 数据生成了完全一致和稳健的模型。BWS 偏好被映射到 DCE 值上,从而为分类系统定义的每个健康状态生成效用估计。

结论

这是第一个基于偏好为儿童口腔健康研究专门开发的具有预定评分的测量方法,并使用了一种新的技术来使用青少年偏好生成价值集。这些估计可用于生成改善儿童口腔健康干预措施的经济评估中的 QALYs。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e388/8812216/b88b376d5b94/12955_2022_1918_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e388/8812216/682b515e4b2e/12955_2022_1918_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e388/8812216/b88b376d5b94/12955_2022_1918_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e388/8812216/682b515e4b2e/12955_2022_1918_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e388/8812216/b88b376d5b94/12955_2022_1918_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Adolescent valuation of CARIES-QC-U: a child-centred preference-based measure of dental caries.青少年对 CARIES-QC-U 的评估:一种以儿童为中心的基于偏好的龋齿测量方法。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Feb 3;20(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01918-w.
2
Valuing the Dental Caries Utility Index in Australia.重视澳大利亚的龋齿效用指数。
Med Decis Making. 2023 Oct-Nov;43(7-8):901-913. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231197149. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
3
Valuation study for a preference-based quality of life measure for dental caries (Dental Caries Utility Index - DCUI) among Australian adolescents - study protocol.用于评估澳大利亚青少年龋齿(龋齿效用指数-DCUI)偏好的生活质量量表的价值研究-研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 21;10(10):e038626. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038626.
4
Developing an Australian utility value set for the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale-4D (ECOHIS-4D) using a discrete choice experiment.采用离散选择实验开发澳大利亚婴幼儿口腔健康影响量表-4 维度(ECOHIS-4D)效用值集。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Nov;24(8):1285-1296. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01542-x. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
5
Valuing Child Health Utility 9D health states with a young adolescent sample: a feasibility study to compare best-worst scaling discrete-choice experiment, standard gamble and time trade-off methods.用青少年样本评估儿童健康效用值 9D 健康状态:比较最佳最差标度离散选择实验、标准博弈和时间权衡方法的可行性研究。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011;9(1):15-27. doi: 10.2165/11536960-000000000-00000.
6
Developing adolescent-specific health state values for economic evaluation: an application of profile case best-worst scaling to the Child Health Utility 9D.制定青少年特定健康状态值用于经济评价:应用轮廓实例最佳最差标度对儿童健康效用 9D 的应用。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Aug 1;30(8):713-27. doi: 10.2165/11597900-000000000-00000.
7
Development of a classification (descriptive) system for a preference-based quality of life measure for dental caries (dental caries utility index) among adolescents.青少年龋齿基于偏好的生活质量测量(龋齿效用指数)分类(描述性)系统的开发。
J Public Health Dent. 2022 Jun;82(3):253-261. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12490. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
8
Valuing the Child Health Utility 9D: Using profile case best worst scaling methods to develop a new adolescent specific scoring algorithm.儿童健康效用9D的评估:运用轮廓案例最佳-最差标度法开发一种新的针对青少年的评分算法。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 May;157:48-59. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.042. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
9
Estimating a Preference-Based Single Index Measuring the Quality-of-Life Impact of Self-Management for Diabetes.估算偏好加权单一指数,衡量糖尿病自我管理对生活质量的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Aug;38(6):699-707. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18784291. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
10
Scoring the Child Health Utility 9D instrument: estimation of a Chinese child and adolescent-specific tariff.儿童健康效用 9D 量表评分:中国儿童和青少年特异性量表的制定。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Jan;28(1):163-176. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2032-z. Epub 2018 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
2
Economic evaluation on dental caries preventive interventions for Australian children using a priority-setting approach.采用优先排序方法对澳大利亚儿童龋齿预防干预措施进行的经济评估。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01787-2.
3
A systematic review of condition-specific preference-based measures used in young people and their valuation methods.

本文引用的文献

1
Discrete choice experiments or best-worst scaling? A qualitative study to determine the suitability of preference elicitation tasks in research with children and young people.离散选择实验还是最佳-最差尺度法?一项定性研究,以确定在针对儿童和年轻人的研究中偏好诱导任务的适用性。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Mar 10;5(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00302-4.
2
Selection and validation of a classification system for a child-centred preference-based measure of oral health-related quality of life specific to dental caries.针对以儿童为中心的基于偏好的龋齿特异性口腔健康相关生活质量测量分类系统的选择与验证。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Dec 9;4(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00268-9.
3
对年轻人使用的特定疾病偏好性测量方法及其评估方法的系统评价。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Dec 19;8(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00826-5.
4
Comparison of the early childhood oral health impact scale (ECOHIS-4D) and EuroQol-5D-Y for measuring oral health-related quality of life utility in children.早期儿童口腔健康影响量表(ECOHIS - 4D)与欧洲五维健康量表 - 儿童版(EuroQol - 5D - Y)在测量儿童口腔健康相关生活质量效用方面的比较。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Feb;34(2):385-393. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03816-8. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
5
Behaviour change intervention (education and text) to prevent dental caries in secondary school pupils: BRIGHT RCT, process and economic evaluation.行为改变干预(教育和文本)以预防中学生龋齿:BRIGHT RCT、过程和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Sep;28(52):1-142. doi: 10.3310/JQTA2103.
6
Comparing the Self-Reported Acceptability of Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling: An Empirical Study in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.比较离散选择实验和最佳-最差标度法的自我报告可接受性:2型糖尿病患者的实证研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Aug 30;18:1803-1813. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S470310. eCollection 2024.
7
A scoping review to create a framework for the steps in developing condition-specific preference-based instruments de novo or from an existing non-preference-based instrument: use of item response theory or Rasch analysis.一项范围综述,旨在为从头开发或从现有非偏好量表中开发特定疾病偏好量表的步骤创建一个框架:使用项目反应理论或 Rasch 分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 May 14;22(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02253-y.
8
Oral Health, Social and Emotional Well-Being, and Economic Costs: Protocol for the Second Australian National Child Oral Health Survey.口腔健康、社会与情感福祉以及经济成本:第二次澳大利亚全国儿童口腔健康调查方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 14;12:e52233. doi: 10.2196/52233.
9
Valuing the Dental Caries Utility Index in Australia.重视澳大利亚的龋齿效用指数。
Med Decis Making. 2023 Oct-Nov;43(7-8):901-913. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231197149. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
10
Fit for Purpose? The Suitability of Oral Health Outcome Measures to Inform Policy.是否符合目的?口腔健康结局测量指标用于制定政策的适宜性。
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2024 Apr;9(2):190-192. doi: 10.1177/23800844231189997. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
Valuing the SF-6Dv2 Classification System in the United Kingdom Using a Discrete-choice Experiment With Duration.
采用具有持续时间的离散选择实验评估英国的 SF-6Dv2 分类系统
Med Care. 2020 Jun;58(6):566-573. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001324.
4
Feasibility, Validity and Differences in Adolescent and Adult EQ-5D-Y Health State Valuation in Australia and Spain: An Application of Best-Worst Scaling.澳大利亚和西班牙青少年和成人 EQ-5D-Y 健康状态估值的可行性、有效性和差异:最佳最差量表的应用。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 May;38(5):499-513. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00884-9.
5
Review of Valuation Methods of Preference-Based Measures of Health for Economic Evaluation in Child and Adolescent Populations: Where are We Now and Where are We Going?基于偏好的儿童和青少年健康衡量指标的经济评价估值方法综述:我们现在在哪里,我们要去哪里?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Apr;38(4):325-340. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00873-7.
6
U.K. utility weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D.英国针对欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量核心问卷-10维度的效用权重。
Health Econ. 2019 Dec;28(12):1385-1401. doi: 10.1002/hec.3950. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
7
A Comparison of Three Child OHRQoL Measures.三种儿童口腔健康相关生活质量测量方法的比较
Dent J (Basel). 2019 Feb 12;7(1):19. doi: 10.3390/dj7010019.
8
Development and evaluation of CARIES-QC: a caries-specific measure of quality of life for children.龋病儿童生活质量特异性量表(CARIES-QC)的制定与评价。
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0662-8.
9
Scoring the Child Health Utility 9D instrument: estimation of a Chinese child and adolescent-specific tariff.儿童健康效用 9D 量表评分:中国儿童和青少年特异性量表的制定。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Jan;28(1):163-176. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2032-z. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
10
Estimating a Dutch Value Set for the Pediatric Preference-Based CHU9D Using a Discrete Choice Experiment with Duration.使用带有持续时间的离散选择实验估计儿科偏好的 CHU9D 的荷兰值集
Value Health. 2018 Oct;21(10):1234-1242. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.03.016. Epub 2018 May 21.