• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用优先排序方法对澳大利亚儿童龋齿预防干预措施进行的经济评估。

Economic evaluation on dental caries preventive interventions for Australian children using a priority-setting approach.

作者信息

Nguyen Tan Minh, Le Long Khanh-Dao, Calache Hanny, Mihalopoulos Cathrine

机构信息

Health Economics Group, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Level 4, 553 St Kilda Road, VIC, 3004, Melbourne, Australia.

Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, VIC, 3125, Burwood, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01787-2.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-025-01787-2
PMID:40304833
Abstract

This study aims to economically evaluate three preventive interventions for dental caries among Australian children from low household income. The interventions included: (1) anticipatory guidance provided by oral health therapists via 1a) home visits or 1b) telehealth consultations; (2) school-based dental screening and fluoride varnish program delivered by 2a) dental practitioners or 2b) non-dental health professionals (no screening); and (3) school-based fissure sealant program. The base-case scenario included intervention and dental treatment costs, with six-year (1a and 1b) and two-year (2a, 2b and 3) time horizons. Sensitivity analysis included other healthcare costs (e.g. pulp therapy, extractions, etc.). Additionally, extrapolation modelling extended the 12-year time horizon (all interventions). Probability for cost-effectiveness applied AUD$50,000 per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted, and AUD$28,033 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained willingness-to-pay thresholds. Under the base-case scenario, none of the interventions were cost-effective. Cost-effectiveness results were sensitive when including other healthcare costs and the 12-year time horizon. Probability for cost-effectiveness (DALYs averted/QALYs gained) with extrapolation modelling in order of ranking were: (1) 91.5%/94.7% for fluoride varnish, (2) 43.9%/48.6% for dental screening and fluoride varnish, (3) 28.7%/29.8% for anticipatory guidance via telehealth, (4) 17.1%/20.0% for fissure sealant, and (5) 2.2%/2.2% for anticipatory guidance via home visits.

摘要

本研究旨在对澳大利亚低收入家庭儿童的三种龋齿预防干预措施进行经济评估。干预措施包括:(1)口腔健康治疗师通过1a)家访或1b)远程医疗咨询提供的预防性指导;(2)由2a)牙科医生或2b)非牙科卫生专业人员开展的基于学校的牙科筛查和氟化物涂漆项目(无筛查);以及(3)基于学校的窝沟封闭项目。基础案例包括干预和牙科治疗成本,时间跨度为六年(1a和1b)以及两年(2a、2b和3)。敏感性分析包括其他医疗成本(如牙髓治疗、拔牙等)。此外,外推模型将时间跨度延长至12年(所有干预措施)。成本效益概率采用每避免一个伤残调整生命年(DALY)50,000澳元,以及每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)28,033澳元的支付意愿阈值。在基础案例中,没有一种干预措施具有成本效益。当纳入其他医疗成本和12年时间跨度时,成本效益结果较为敏感。外推模型下按排名顺序的成本效益概率(避免的DALY/获得的QALY)为:(1)氟化物涂漆为91.5%/94.7%,(2)牙科筛查和氟化物涂漆为43.9%/48.6%,(3)通过远程医疗的预防性指导为28.7%/

相似文献

1
Economic evaluation on dental caries preventive interventions for Australian children using a priority-setting approach.采用优先排序方法对澳大利亚儿童龋齿预防干预措施进行的经济评估。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01787-2.
2
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.窝沟封闭剂与氟化物漆预防儿童和青少年恒牙龋齿的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 18;2016(1):CD003067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub4.
3
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.用于预防儿童和青少年恒牙龋齿的窝沟封闭剂与氟化物涂剂对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 4;11(11):CD003067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub5.
4
Seal or Varnish? A randomised controlled trial to determine the relative cost and effectiveness of pit and fissure sealant and fluoride varnish in preventing dental decay.窝沟封闭剂还是氟漆?一项随机对照试验,以确定窝沟封闭剂和氟漆在预防龋齿方面的相对成本和效果。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Apr;21(21):1-256. doi: 10.3310/hta21210.
5
A Markov cost-effective analysis of biannual fluoride varnish for preventing dental caries in permanent teeth over a 70-year time horizon.在 70 年的时间跨度内,每半年使用氟化物涂料预防恒牙龋齿的成本效益马尔可夫分析。
Health Promot J Austr. 2020 Apr;31(2):177-183. doi: 10.1002/hpja.283. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
6
Protocol for "Seal or Varnish?" (SoV) trial: a randomised controlled trial to measure the relative cost and effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants and fluoride varnish in preventing dental decay.“密封还是上釉?”(SoV)试验方案:一项随机对照试验,旨在衡量窝沟封闭剂和氟化物涂料在预防龋齿方面的相对成本和效果。
BMC Oral Health. 2012 Nov 20;12:51. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-12-51.
7
Exploring the cost-effectiveness of child dental caries prevention programmes. Are we comparing apples and oranges?探索儿童龋齿预防项目的成本效益。我们是在进行不恰当的比较吗?
Evid Based Dent. 2020 Mar;21(1):5-7. doi: 10.1038/s41432-020-0085-7.
8
The acceptability of fluoride varnish and fissure sealant treatments in children aged 6-9 delivered in a school setting.在学校环境中为6至9岁儿童提供氟化物清漆和窝沟封闭治疗的可接受性。
Community Dent Health. 2019 Feb 25;36(1):33-38. doi: 10.1922/CDH_4263Morgan-Trimmer06.
9
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Population-Level Dental Caries Prevention Strategies in US Children.美国儿童人群层面龋齿预防策略的成本效益分析。
Acad Pediatr. 2024 Jul;24(5):765-775. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2024.02.006. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
10
Fissure seal or fluoride varnish?窝沟封闭还是氟漆?
Evid Based Dent. 2016 Sep;17(3):77-78. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401184.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeled health economic and equity impact on dental caries and health outcomes from a 20% sugar sweetened beverages tax in Australia.澳大利亚对含糖饮料征收 20%的税对龋齿和健康结果的健康经济和公平影响建模。
Health Econ. 2023 Nov;32(11):2568-2582. doi: 10.1002/hec.4739. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
2
Is value-based healthcare a strategy to achieve universal health coverage that includes oral health? An Australian case study.基于价值的医疗保健是否是实现包含口腔健康的全民健康覆盖的一种策略?澳大利亚案例研究。
J Public Health Policy. 2023 Jun;44(2):310-324. doi: 10.1057/s41271-023-00414-9. Epub 2023 May 4.
3
Economic Evaluations of Preventive Interventions for Dental Caries and Periodontitis: A Systematic Review.
预防龋齿和牙周炎的经济学评价:系统评价。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 Jan;21(1):53-70. doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00758-5. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
4
Medicaid Payment and Fluoride Varnish Application During Pediatric Medical Visits. Medicaid 支付与儿童医疗就诊期间的氟化物涂料应用。
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Dec;79(6):834-843. doi: 10.1177/10775587221074766. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
5
Adolescent valuation of CARIES-QC-U: a child-centred preference-based measure of dental caries.青少年对 CARIES-QC-U 的评估:一种以儿童为中心的基于偏好的龋齿测量方法。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Feb 3;20(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01918-w.
6
Oral Health Policies to Tackle the Burden of Early Childhood Caries: A Review of 14 Countries/Regions.应对幼儿龋齿负担的口腔健康政策:对14个国家/地区的综述
Front Oral Health. 2021 Jun 9;2:670154. doi: 10.3389/froh.2021.670154. eCollection 2021.
7
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations.2022 年健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS 2022)声明:健康经济评估报告的更新指南。
BMC Med. 2022 Jan 12;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02204-0.
8
Child Fluoride Varnish Programs Implementation: A Consensus Workshop and Actions to Increase Scale-Up in Australia.儿童氟化物涂漆项目实施:澳大利亚的一次共识研讨会及扩大规模的行动
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Aug 11;9(8):1029. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9081029.
9
Australian adolescent population norms for the child health utility index 9D-results from the young minds matter survey.澳大利亚青少年人群儿童健康效用指数 9D 常模:来自“年轻头脑 matters”调查。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Oct;30(10):2895-2906. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02864-8. Epub 2021 May 17.
10
Is fluoride varnish safe?: Validating the safety of fluoride varnish.氟化物涂剂安全吗?:验证氟化物涂剂的安全性。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 May;152(5):364-368. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Mar 22.