Suppr超能文献

比较水上运动和陆上运动对老年人平衡能力的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparing the effects of aquatic-based exercise and land-based exercise on balance in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Deng Ying, Tang Zheng, Yang Zhengting, Chai Qi, Lu Wenting, Cai Yunshi, Luo Yiting, Zhou Yongzhao

机构信息

Sichuan University, West China Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2024 May 19;21(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s11556-024-00349-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Balance plays a crucial role in the daily activities of older adults. Aquatic-based exercises (AE) are widely conducted as an alternative to land-based exercises (LE). Previous studies have compared AE and LE as effective ways to improve balance and have yielded inconsistent results. Therefore, this review aimed to compare the effects of AE and LE on balance function in older adults.

METHODS

Electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase, were searched. Randomized controlled trials published from January 2003 to June 2023 were included following predetermined criteria. Data extraction was carried out by two independent reviewers. Data synthesis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. The fixed-effect model or random-effect model was chosen based on the results of the heterogeneity test. Meta-analysis for the effect sizes of balance outcomes was calculated as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. This review was registered at PROSPERO CRD42023429557.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies involving 1486 older adults (with an average age of 66.2 years) were included. Meta-analysis results indicated that AE could improve balance ability based on two tests: the Berg balance scale (BBS: SMD = 1.13, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.00, p = 0.01, I = 94%) and the 30-s chair stand test (30 CST: SMD = 2.02, 95% CI 0.50 to 3.54, p = 0.009, I = 96%). However, there were no significant differences between the AE group and the LE group in terms of the 6-min walking test (6 MWT: SMD = 0.13, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.43, p = 0.38, I = 62%) and time up to go test (TUGT: SMD = 0.44, 95% CI -0.44 to 0.91, p = 0.07, I = 85%). Older adults with different health conditions have different gains in different balance measurements after AE intervention and LE intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this was influenced by participant health status, transfer effects, sample size, and other factors, AE offers better benefits than LE for improving balance function in older adults.

摘要

背景

平衡在老年人的日常活动中起着至关重要的作用。水上运动(AE)作为陆上运动(LE)的替代运动被广泛开展。以往的研究比较了水上运动和陆上运动作为改善平衡的有效方法,结果并不一致。因此,本综述旨在比较水上运动和陆上运动对老年人平衡功能的影响。

方法

检索了包括PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus和Embase在内的电子数据库。按照预定标准纳入2003年1月至2023年6月发表的随机对照试验。由两名独立的评审员进行数据提取。使用RevMan 5.3软件进行数据合成。根据异质性检验结果选择固定效应模型或随机效应模型。平衡结果效应大小的Meta分析计算为标准化平均差(SMD),并给出95%置信区间(CI)。使用物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)量表评估纳入研究的质量。本综述已在PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD42023429557。

结果

共纳入29项研究,涉及1486名老年人(平均年龄66.2岁)。Meta分析结果表明,基于两项测试,水上运动可以提高平衡能力:伯格平衡量表(BBS:SMD = 1.13,95% CI 0.25至2.00,p = 0.01,I = 94%)和30秒椅子站立测试(30 CST:SMD = 2.02,95% CI 0.50至3.54,p = 0.009,I = 96%)。然而,在6分钟步行测试(6 MWT:SMD = 0.13,95% CI -0.16至0.43,p = 0.38,I = 62%)和起立行走测试(TUGT:SMD = 0.44,95% CI -0.44至0.91,p = 0.07,I = 85%)方面,水上运动组和陆上运动组之间没有显著差异。不同健康状况的老年人在接受水上运动干预和陆上运动干预后,在不同的平衡测量指标上有不同的改善。

结论

尽管这受到参与者健康状况、转移效应、样本量和其他因素的影响,但在改善老年人平衡功能方面,水上运动比陆上运动更有益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1254/11102618/dcd08196fe77/11556_2024_349_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验