Klopfer F J, Jackson T T, Jeffrey G S, Wolfe W G
J Pers Assess. 1978 Jun;42(3):295-301. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4203_12.
A series of studies was undertaken to determine possible factors contributing to low predictive utility for Felt Figure Replacement Technique (FFRT) scores from normal, adult males. It was first postulated that normal adult males, compared to normal adult females, are less sensitive to social cues present in the FFRT task. Twenty-six undergraduate males and the same number of undergraduate females were asked to replace both a) department store manikins, thought to be less abstract, and then b) felt figures. While task differences were obtained, these were not dependent on gender, nor did any overall gender differences occur for three types of replacement error. The second study involved 31 college males and 33 college females replacing both felt figures and a male and female confederate. It was assumed that differential attention to social cues would be more visible in this comparison. The general results were identical to the first study.
开展了一系列研究，以确定可能导致正常成年男性的毡制人偶替换技术（FFRT）得分预测效用较低的因素。最初假设，与正常成年女性相比，正常成年男性对FFRT任务中存在的社会线索不太敏感。26名本科男性和相同数量的本科女性被要求替换：a）被认为不那么抽象的百货商店人体模型，然后b）毡制人偶。虽然获得了任务差异，但这些差异并不取决于性别，三种类型的替换错误也没有出现任何总体性别差异。第二项研究涉及31名大学男性和33名大学女性替换毡制人偶以及一名男性和一名女性同盟者。据推测，在这种比较中，对社会线索的不同关注会更加明显。总体结果与第一项研究相同。
