Department of Medicine, Medical School, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Aging Ment Health. 2023 Feb;27(2):445-451. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2032593. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
To understand the relationship between mortality and three types of perceived discrimination (lifetime, daily, chronic job) using a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults.
Data from 4562 adults in the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) between 2004 and 2006 (MIDUS II and MIDUS African American sample) were analyzed. Unadjusted associations between primary independent discrimination variables (lifetime, chronic job, daily) and mortality were analyzed using univariate Cox's proportional hazards regression models. Covariates were added to the models by group: predisposing (sex, age, race/ethnicity, education, marital status); enabling (household income, employment status, insurance status); and need factors (body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, stroke, cancer) to estimate hazard ratios.
After adjusting for all covariates, hazard ratios for lifetime discrimination (HR: 1.09, = 0.034) and daily discrimination (HR: 1.03, = 0.030) were statistically significant. There was no relationship between mortality and chronic job discrimination (HR:1.03, = 0.15).
Adults experiencing lifetime and daily discrimination had significantly increased risk of mortality after adjusting for predisposing, enabling, and need factors. The findings highlight the importance of screening patients during clinical encounters for experiences of discrimination and providing appropriate resources to mitigate the negative impact of discriminatory events on mortality. Future research should work to fully understand the mechanism by which discrimination increases risk of mortality. These future findings should be used to develop targets for interventions designed to decrease mortality among adults who have experienced discrimination.
使用美国成年人的全国代表性样本,了解与三种感知歧视(终身、日常、慢性工作)相关的死亡率。
对 2004 年至 2006 年期间(MIDUS II 和 MIDUS 非裔美国人样本)的美国中年生活(MIDUS)中的 4562 名成年人的 4562 名成年人进行数据分析。使用单变量 Cox 比例风险回归模型分析主要独立歧视变量(终身、慢性工作、日常)与死亡率之间的未调整关联。根据组添加协变量:易感性(性别、年龄、种族/民族、教育、婚姻状况);赋权(家庭收入、就业状况、保险状况);和需求因素(体重指数、糖尿病、高血压、中风、癌症),以估计风险比。
在调整所有协变量后,终身歧视(HR:1.09, = 0.034)和日常歧视(HR:1.03, = 0.030)的风险比具有统计学意义。慢性工作歧视与死亡率之间没有关系(HR:1.03, = 0.15)。
在调整易感性、赋权和需求因素后,经历终身和日常歧视的成年人的死亡率显著增加。研究结果强调了在临床就诊中筛查患者歧视经历并提供适当资源以减轻歧视事件对死亡率的负面影响的重要性。未来的研究应该努力充分了解歧视增加死亡率的机制。这些未来的发现应该用于制定干预措施的目标,以减少经历歧视的成年人的死亡率。