Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Health Policy & Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Rev Med Virol. 2023 May;33(3):e2330. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2330. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
This review sought to assess the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of high-dose inactivated influenza vaccines (HD-IIV) for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza in individuals aged 18 years or older. A systematic literature search was conducted in electronic databases and grey literature sources up to 7 February 2020. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs) were included. The search returned 28,846 records, of which 36 studies were included. HD-IIV was shown to have higher relative vaccine efficacy in preventing influenza compared with standard-dose influenza vaccines (SD-IIV3) in older adults (Vaccine effectiveness (VE) = 24%, 95% CI 10-37, one RCT). One NRSI demonstrated significant effect for HD-IIV3 against influenza B (VE = 89%, 95% CI 47-100), but not for influenza A(H3N2) (VE = 22%, 95% CI -82 to 66) when compared with no vaccination in older adults. HD-IIV3 showed significant relative effect compared with SD-IIV3 for influenza-related hospitalisation (VE = 11.8%, 95% CI 6.4-17.0, two NRSIs), influenza- or pneumonia-related hospitalisation (VE = 13.7%, 95% CI 9.5-17.7, three NRSIs), influenza-related hospital encounters (VE = 13.1%, 95% CI 8.4-17.7, five NRSIs), and influenza-related office visits (VE = 3.5%, 95% CI 1.5-5.5, two NRSIs). For safety, HD-IIV were associated with significantly higher rates of local and systemic adverse events compared with SD-IIV (combined local reactions, pain at injection site, swelling, induration, headache, chills and malaise). From limited data, compared with SD-IIV, HD-IIV were found to be more effective in the prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza, for a range of proxy outcome measures, and associated with more adverse events.
本综述旨在评估高剂量灭活流感疫苗(HD-IIV)在预防 18 岁及以上个体实验室确诊流感方面的疗效、效果和安全性。系统检索了电子数据库和灰色文献资源,截至 2020 年 2 月 7 日。纳入了随机对照试验(RCT)和干预性非随机研究(NRSI)。检索共返回 28846 条记录,其中纳入了 36 项研究。与标准剂量流感疫苗(SD-IIV3)相比,HD-IIV 显示出在预防老年人流感方面具有更高的相对疫苗效力(疫苗效力(VE)=24%,95%CI 10-37,一项 RCT)。一项 NRSI 表明,HD-IIV3 对乙型流感(VE=89%,95%CI 47-100)具有显著效果,但对甲型流感(H3N2)(VE=22%,95%CI-82 至 66)无效果,与老年人未接种疫苗相比。与 SD-IIV3 相比,HD-IIV3 对流感相关住院治疗(VE=11.8%,95%CI 6.4-17.0,两项 NRSI)、流感或肺炎相关住院治疗(VE=13.7%,95%CI 9.5-17.7,三项 NRSI)、流感相关住院就诊(VE=13.1%,95%CI 8.4-17.7,五项 NRSI)和流感相关门诊就诊(VE=3.5%,95%CI 1.5-5.5,两项 NRSI)具有显著的相对效果。在安全性方面,与 SD-IIV 相比,HD-IIV 与更高的局部和全身不良事件发生率相关(联合局部反应、注射部位疼痛、肿胀、硬结、头痛、寒战和不适)。从有限的数据来看,与 SD-IIV 相比,HD-IIV 被发现对实验室确诊流感的预防更有效,对一系列替代结局测量具有更高的有效性,且与更多的不良反应相关。