• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康素养对男性假体手术后满意度的影响。

Impact of Health Literacy on Satisfaction Following Male Prosthetic Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

出版信息

Urology. 2022 Jun;164:255-261. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.12.031. Epub 2022 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2021.12.031
PMID:35120965
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a patient's health literacy impacts patient satisfaction following inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) or artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of patients who underwent IPP or AUS between January 1, 2016 and July 31, 2020 was performed. A telephone questionnaire assessed overall satisfaction and if patients would undergo surgery again. Health literacy was measured using the Brief Health Literacy Screen (BHLS). Multivariate ordinal logistic regression was used to assess the association between health literacy and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

At a median follow up of 2.4 years, 113 (70%) of the 162 IPP patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with their procedure and 120 (74%) patients would undergo surgery again. Of the 76 AUS patients, 65 (86%) were either satisfied or very satisfied with their procedure and 65 (86%) patients would undergo surgery again. After adjustment for potential confounders, increasing BHLS score was significantly associated with satisfaction for both IPP (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11-1.54; P = .001) and AUS surgery (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.56; P = .034), as well as with likelihood of undergoing IPP surgery again (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.25-1.87; P <.001). BHLS was not associated, however, with likelihood of undergoing AUS surgery again (P = .403).

CONCLUSION

Men with lower health literacy are less likely to be satisfied following prosthetic surgery. The BHLS is an important tool that can be used to identify patients who may benefit from increased preoperative counseling to improve patient expectations and quality of life following prosthetic surgery.

摘要

目的

确定患者的健康素养是否会影响充气阴茎假体(IPP)或人工尿道括约肌(AUS)植入术后的患者满意度。

材料与方法

对 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 7 月 31 日期间接受 IPP 或 AUS 手术的患者进行了回顾性研究。通过电话问卷调查评估了总体满意度以及患者是否会再次接受手术。使用简短健康素养量表(BHLS)来衡量健康素养。采用多变量有序逻辑回归来评估健康素养与患者满意度之间的关联。

结果

在中位数为 2.4 年的随访中,162 例 IPP 患者中有 113 例(70%)对其手术过程感到满意或非常满意,120 例(74%)患者会再次接受手术。在 76 例 AUS 患者中,有 65 例(86%)对其手术过程感到满意或非常满意,65 例(86%)患者会再次接受手术。在调整了潜在混杂因素后,对于 IPP(比值比 1.31,95%置信区间 1.11-1.54;P =.001)和 AUS 手术(比值比 1.25,95%置信区间 1.02-1.56;P =.034),以及再次接受 IPP 手术的可能性(比值比 1.53,95%置信区间 1.25-1.87;P <.001),BHLS 评分的升高与满意度显著相关。然而,BHLS 与再次接受 AUS 手术的可能性无关(P =.403)。

结论

健康素养较低的男性在接受假体手术后不太可能感到满意。BHLS 是一种重要的工具,可以用来识别可能受益于增加术前咨询的患者,以改善假体手术后的患者预期和生活质量。

相似文献

1
Impact of Health Literacy on Satisfaction Following Male Prosthetic Surgery.健康素养对男性假体手术后满意度的影响。
Urology. 2022 Jun;164:255-261. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.12.031. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
2
Patient satisfaction after dual implantation of inflatable penile and artificial urinary sphincter prostheses.可膨胀阴茎假体和人工尿道括约肌假体双重植入后的患者满意度
Urology. 2008 May;71(5):893-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.018. Epub 2008 Mar 28.
3
Synchronous Ipsilateral High Submuscular Placement of Prosthetic Balloons and Reservoirs.假体球囊和储液器的同侧同步高位肌下放置
J Sex Med. 2017 Feb;14(2):264-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.12.001. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
4
3-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement Following Radical Cystoprostatectomy and Urinary Diversion: Technique and Outcomes.根治性膀胱切除术和尿流改道术后 3 件式可膨胀阴茎假体植入术:技术与结果。
J Sex Med. 2018 Jun;15(6):907-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
5
Management of end-stage erectile dysfunction and stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy by simultaneous dual implantation using a single trans-scrotal incision: surgical technique and outcomes.经单一阴囊切口同步双植入治疗前列腺癌根治术后终末期勃起功能障碍和压力性尿失禁:手术技术与结果
Asian J Androl. 2015 Sep-Oct;17(5):792-6. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.143757.
6
Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction rates among elderly male aged ≥75 years with inflatable penile prosthesis implant for medically refractory erectile dysfunction.年龄≥75岁的老年男性因药物难治性勃起功能障碍植入可膨胀阴茎假体后的临床结局和患者满意度
World J Urol. 2014 Feb;32(1):173-7. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1102-7. Epub 2013 May 26.
7
Long-Term Follow-Up After Penile Prosthesis Implantation-Survival and Quality of Life Outcomes.阴茎假体植入术后的长期随访——生存和生活质量结果。
J Sex Med. 2019 Nov;16(11):1827-1833. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
8
Combined inflatable penile prosthesis-artificial urinary sphincter implantation: no increased risk of adverse events compared to single or staged device implantation.联合使用可膨胀阴茎假体-人工尿道括约肌植入术:与单一或分期植入装置相比,不良事件风险无增加。
J Urol. 2013 Dec;190(6):2183-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.084. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
9
Satisfaction rates of inflatable penile prosthesis in men who have sex with men are high.男男性行为者对可充气阴茎假体的满意度较高。
Int J Impot Res. 2023 Sep;35(6):564-568. doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00603-2. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
10
A narrative review on synchronous concurrent versus delayed sequential surgery in the artificial urinary sphincter and penile prosthesis implantation.关于人工尿道括约肌和阴茎假体植入术中同步并发手术与延迟序贯手术的叙述性综述。
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Aug 31;13(8):1650-1656. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-22. Epub 2024 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Video discharge instructions increase patient understanding for office-based procedures: a randomized controlled study.视频出院指导可提高患者对门诊手术的理解:一项随机对照研究。
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Mar 30;14(3):678-684. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-501. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
2
ChatGPT as a Support Tool for Informed Consent and Preoperative Patient Education Prior to Penile Prosthesis Implantation.ChatGPT作为阴茎假体植入术前知情同意和患者术前教育的辅助工具。
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 10;13(24):7482. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247482.