Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 27599, USA.
Graduate School of Public Policy, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
J Environ Manage. 2022 Apr 15;308:114422. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114422. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
Globalization and income disparities have raised an urgent need to re-examine the environmental consequences of international trade. Using a global panel dataset covering 93 economies from 1980 to 2017, this paper explores the heterogeneous impacts of international trade on green productivity. Unlike previous studies that impose strict linear assumptions on functional forms, we adopt a newly developed partially linear functional-coefficient model to estimate the specific response functions of green productivity to imports and exports at different income levels, thus emphasizing the potential role of income heterogeneity. The results demonstrate that (1) imports and exports have different non-linear effects on green productivity; (2) imports do not significantly affect green productivity in lower-income countries (relative income level is less than 0.5), but imports increasingly promote green productivity in high-income countries; (3) exports hinder green productivity in extremely low-income countries (relative income level is less than 0.1), while gradually improving green productivity in high-income countries (relative income level is larger than 0.6); and (4) imports and exports promote green productivity more significantly by technological progress rather than efficiency improvements. The stimulus effect from induced technological progress is only observed in higher-income countries.
全球化和收入差距的扩大迫切需要重新审视国际贸易对环境的影响。本文利用一个涵盖 1980 年至 2017 年 93 个经济体的全球面板数据集,探讨了国际贸易对绿色生产力的异质影响。与之前在函数形式上强加严格线性假设的研究不同,我们采用了一种新开发的部分线性功能系数模型来估计绿色生产力对不同收入水平的进口和出口的具体响应函数,从而强调了收入异质性的潜在作用。结果表明:(1)进口和出口对绿色生产力有不同的非线性影响;(2)进口对低收入国家(相对收入水平小于 0.5)的绿色生产力没有显著影响,但进口在高收入国家中越来越促进绿色生产力;(3)出口阻碍了极低收入国家(相对收入水平小于 0.1)的绿色生产力,而在高收入国家中逐渐提高了绿色生产力(相对收入水平大于 0.6);(4)进口和出口通过技术进步而不是效率提高更显著地促进了绿色生产力。在高收入国家中才观察到诱导技术进步带来的刺激效应。