• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

七个蔷薇目物种的密码子使用模式。

Codon usage patterns across seven Rosales species.

机构信息

College of Life Science, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, China.

Hebei Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Molecular Pathology, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, China.

出版信息

BMC Plant Biol. 2022 Feb 5;22(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03450-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12870-022-03450-x
PMID:35123393
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8817548/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Codon usage bias (CUB) analysis is an effective method for studying specificity, evolutionary relationships, and mRNA translation and discovering new genes among various species. In general, CUB analysis is mainly performed within one species or between closely related species and no such study has been applied among species with distant genetic relationships. Here, seven Rosales species with high economic value were selected to conduct CUB analysis.

RESULTS

The results showed that the average GC1, GC2 and GC3 contents were 51.08, 40.52 and 43.12%, respectively, indicating that the A/T content is more abundant and the Rosales species prefer A/T as the last codon. Neutrality plot and ENc plot analysis revealed that natural selection was the main factor leading to CUB during the evolution of Rosales species. All 7 Rosales species contained three high-frequency codons, AGA, GTT and TTG, encoding Arg, Val and Leu, respectively. The 7 Rosales species differed in high-frequency codon pairs and the distribution of GC3, though the usage patterns of closely related species were more consistent. The results of the biclustering heat map among 7 Rosales species and 20 other species were basically consistent with the results of genome data, suggesting that CUB analysis is an effective method for revealing evolutionary relationships among species at the family or order level. In addition, chlorophytes prefer using G/C as ending codon, while monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants prefer using A/T as ending codon.

CONCLUSIONS

The CUB pattern among Rosales species was mainly affected by natural selection. This work is the first to highlight the CUB patterns and characteristics of Rosales species and provides a new perspective for studying genetic relationships across a wide range of species.

摘要

背景

密码子使用偏性(CUB)分析是研究特定性、进化关系以及 mRNA 翻译和发现不同物种中新基因的有效方法。一般来说,CUB 分析主要在一个物种内或亲缘关系密切的物种之间进行,而在遗传关系较远的物种之间尚未进行此类研究。本研究选择了 7 个具有高经济价值的蔷薇目物种进行 CUB 分析。

结果

结果表明,平均 GC1、GC2 和 GC3 含量分别为 51.08%、40.52%和 43.12%,表明 A/T 含量更为丰富,蔷薇目物种偏爱 A/T 作为最后一个密码子。中性图谱和 ENc 图谱分析表明,自然选择是导致蔷薇目物种进化过程中 CUB 的主要因素。7 个蔷薇目物种均包含三个高频密码子 AGA、GTT 和 TTG,分别编码 Arg、Val 和 Leu。7 个蔷薇目物种在高频密码子对和 GC3 的分布上存在差异,尽管亲缘关系密切的物种的使用模式更为一致。7 个蔷薇目物种和 20 个其他物种之间的双聚类热图结果与基因组数据的结果基本一致,表明 CUB 分析是揭示科或目水平物种进化关系的有效方法。此外,绿藻更喜欢使用 G/C 作为终止密码子,而单子叶植物和双子叶植物更喜欢使用 A/T 作为终止密码子。

结论

蔷薇目物种的 CUB 模式主要受自然选择的影响。本研究首次强调了蔷薇目物种的 CUB 模式和特征,为研究广泛物种的遗传关系提供了新的视角。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7d/8817548/8abbc277c5a6/12870_2022_3450_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7d/8817548/9ad9a95489c8/12870_2022_3450_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7d/8817548/dd52691a0655/12870_2022_3450_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7d/8817548/2152cdd5da2a/12870_2022_3450_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7d/8817548/49f3e3d4e8d8/12870_2022_3450_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7d/8817548/8abbc277c5a6/12870_2022_3450_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7d/8817548/9ad9a95489c8/12870_2022_3450_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7d/8817548/dd52691a0655/12870_2022_3450_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7d/8817548/2152cdd5da2a/12870_2022_3450_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7d/8817548/49f3e3d4e8d8/12870_2022_3450_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7d/8817548/8abbc277c5a6/12870_2022_3450_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Codon usage patterns across seven Rosales species.七个蔷薇目物种的密码子使用模式。
BMC Plant Biol. 2022 Feb 5;22(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03450-x.
2
Codon usage characterization and phylogenetic analysis of the mitochondrial genome in Hemerocallis citrina.萱草线粒体基因组密码子使用特征及系统发育分析。
BMC Genom Data. 2024 Jan 13;25(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12863-024-01191-4.
3
Analysis of codon usage bias and evolution in the chloroplast genome of Mesona chinensis Benth.凉粉草叶绿体基因组密码子使用偏好性及进化分析
Dev Genes Evol. 2021 Mar;231(1-2):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s00427-020-00670-9. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
4
Evolution of Codon Usage Bias in Diatoms.硅藻密码子使用偏好的进化。
Genes (Basel). 2019 Nov 6;10(11):894. doi: 10.3390/genes10110894.
5
Analysis of codon usage patterns in 48 Aconitum species.分析 48 种乌头属植物的密码子使用模式。
BMC Genomics. 2023 Nov 22;24(1):703. doi: 10.1186/s12864-023-09650-5.
6
Comparative Analysis of Codon Usage Bias in Six Genomes.六个基因组密码子使用偏性的比较分析。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Aug 1;25(15):8398. doi: 10.3390/ijms25158398.
7
Codon usage by chloroplast gene is bias in .叶绿体基因的密码子使用存在偏向性。 (你提供的原文似乎不太完整,推测完整句子可能是这样,具体可根据实际情况调整)
J Genet. 2020;99.
8
Analysis of codon usage bias of thioredoxin in apicomplexan protozoa.分析顶复门原生动物硫氧还蛋白的密码子使用偏性。
Parasit Vectors. 2023 Nov 21;16(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-06002-w.
9
Mutation pressure and natural selection on codon usage in chloroplast genes of two species in L. (Fabaceae: Faboideae).豆科蝶形花亚科野豌豆属两个物种叶绿体基因密码子使用的突变压力和自然选择
Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2019 May;30(4):664-673. doi: 10.1080/24701394.2019.1616701. Epub 2019 May 23.
10
Analysis of Codon Usage Bias in Chloroplast Genomes of var. (Rosaceae).分析蔷薇科(Rosaceae) 变种叶绿体基因组密码子使用偏性。
Genes (Basel). 2024 Jul 9;15(7):899. doi: 10.3390/genes15070899.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Codon Usage Bias of 30 Chloroplast Genomes in (Ulvophyceae, Chlorophyta).绿藻门石莼纲30个叶绿体基因组的密码子使用偏好性分析
Genes (Basel). 2025 May 21;16(5):608. doi: 10.3390/genes16050608.
2
Complete mitochondrial genome of and its comparative analysis.[物种名称]的完整线粒体基因组及其比较分析。 (原文中“of”后面缺少具体物种名称)
Front Genet. 2025 Apr 23;16:1530105. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1530105. eCollection 2025.
3
Comprehensive analysis of complete chloroplast genome sequence of Morina L.刺参属叶绿体全基因组序列的综合分析

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of codon usage patterns in citrus based on coding sequence data.基于编码序列数据的柑橘密码子使用模式分析。
BMC Genomics. 2020 Dec 16;21(Suppl 5):234. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6641-x.
2
Comparative analysis of codon usage patterns in chloroplast genomes of six species.六种植物叶绿体基因组密码子使用模式的比较分析。
PeerJ. 2020 Jan 6;8:e8251. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8251. eCollection 2020.
3
Analysis of codon usage patterns in "Lonicerae Flos" (Lonicera macranthoides Hand. -Mazz.) based on transcriptome data.基于转录组数据的“金银花”(忍冬 Lonicera macranthoides Hand. -Mazz.)密码子使用模式分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 28;15(1):14858. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99504-9.
4
The organelle genomes of the endangered seagrass reveal sequence divergences, massive gene transfer, and uncommon RNA editing types.濒危海草的细胞器基因组揭示了序列差异、大量基因转移和罕见的RNA编辑类型。
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Feb 17;16:1550467. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1550467. eCollection 2025.
5
Analysis of heavy metal tolerance and genomics in an indigenous Kurthia strain from Kulik River reveals multi-metal resistance and dominance of selection pressure on codon usage patterns.对库利克河本土库尔希亚菌株的重金属耐受性和基因组学分析揭示了多重金属抗性以及密码子使用模式上选择压力的主导作用。
Arch Microbiol. 2025 Feb 13;207(3):57. doi: 10.1007/s00203-025-04255-w.
6
Codon usage analysis in selected virulence genes of Staphylococcal species.葡萄球菌属选定毒力基因的密码子使用分析。
Curr Genet. 2025 Jan 24;71(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s00294-025-01308-x.
7
Analysis of synonymous codon usage bias of Lassa virus.拉沙病毒同义密码子使用偏好性分析
Virus Res. 2025 Mar;353:199528. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2025.199528. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
8
Comparative organelle genomics in Daphniphyllaceae reveal phylogenetic position and organelle structure evolution.交让木科的比较细胞器基因组学揭示了系统发育位置和细胞器结构进化。
BMC Genomics. 2025 Jan 15;26(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12864-025-11213-9.
9
Compare Analysis of Codon Usage Bias of Nuclear Genome in Eight Sapindaceae Species.八种无患子科植物核基因组密码子使用偏好性的比较分析
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Dec 24;26(1):39. doi: 10.3390/ijms26010039.
10
Phylogenomics and plastome evolution of Lithospermeae (Boraginaceae).石竹族(紫草科)的系统基因组学和质体基因组进化。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):957. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05665-6.
Gene. 2019 Jul 15;705:127-132. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2019.04.065. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
4
Codon usage vis-a-vis start and stop codon context analysis of three dicot species.三种双子叶植物物种起始密码子和终止密码子上下文的密码子使用情况分析
J Genet. 2018 Mar;97(1):97-107.
5
Genome-wide analysis of codon usage bias in four sequenced cotton species.四个已测序棉种的密码子使用偏性的全基因组分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 27;13(3):e0194372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194372. eCollection 2018.
6
Codon usage and codon pair patterns in non-grass monocot genomes.非禾本科单子叶植物基因组中的密码子使用和密码子对模式。
Ann Bot. 2017 Nov 28;120(6):893-909. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx112.
7
Analysis of codon usage patterns in Morus notabilis based on genome and transcriptome data.基于基因组和转录组数据的桑(Morus notabilis)密码子使用模式分析
Genome. 2017 Jun;60(6):473-484. doi: 10.1139/gen-2016-0129. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
8
Genome-wide comparative analysis of codon usage bias and codon context patterns among cyanobacterial genomes.蓝藻基因组中密码子使用偏好和密码子上下文模式的全基因组比较分析。
Mar Genomics. 2017 Apr;32:31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.margen.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
9
Codon usage trend in mitochondrial CYB gene.线粒体CYB基因的密码子使用趋势
Gene. 2016 Jul 15;586(1):105-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
10
Analysis of Codon Usage Patterns in Herbaceous Peony (Paeonia lactiflora Pall.) Based on Transcriptome Data.基于转录组数据的芍药(Paeonia lactiflora Pall.)密码子使用模式分析
Genes (Basel). 2015 Oct 22;6(4):1125-39. doi: 10.3390/genes6041125.