Sy John, Wenziger Cachet, Marroquin Maria, Kalantar-Zadeh Kamyar, Kovesdy Csaba, Streja Elani
Division of Nephrology, Tibor Rubin VA Medical Center, Long Beach, California, USA.
Division of Nephrology, Harold Simmons Center for Kidney Disease Research and Epidemiology, Hypertension, and Kidney Disease, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, California, USA.
Nephron. 2022;146(4):360-368. doi: 10.1159/000521494. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
Anticoagulation is commonly used for stroke prevention among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); however, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on hemodialysis are at higher risk of bleeding and stroke, even without anticoagulation. It is unclear if patients should be continued on anticoagulation at the time of transition to ESRD. In this study, we validated risk scores for stroke and bleeding in this population and assessed risk of stroke and bleeding among warfarin users compared to nonusers.
We utilized a cohort of 28,620 pre-dialysis US veterans transitioning to hemodialysis between October 2007 and March 2015. Incident rates for the risks of stroke and bleeding were ascertained based upon CHA2DS2-VASc or HAS-BLED scores, respectively. A propensity score-based competing risk analysis was used to assess risk of stroke and bleeding.
The mean age of our cohort was 77 ± 9 years, and the median CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 7 (5, 8) and 3 (3, 4), respectively. Increasing CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were predictive of increasing stroke and bleeding rates, respectively. However, warfarin use did not appear to affect the risk of stroke and bleeding (p-interaction = 0.84 for stroke and 0.24 for bleeding). Warfarin use was associated with a higher risk of stroke (adjusted SHR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.23-1.69) and a higher risk of bleeding (adjusted SHR 1.38, 95% CI: 1.25-1.52) when accounting for the competing risk of death.
There was no difference in incidence rates of stroke or bleeding among warfarin users versus nonusers. Warfarin was associated with a higher risk of stroke and bleeding after considering mortality risk.
抗凝治疗常用于心房颤动(AF)患者的卒中预防;然而,接受血液透析的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者即使未进行抗凝治疗,发生出血和卒中的风险也更高。对于转为ESRD的患者是否应继续进行抗凝治疗尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们验证了该人群中卒中及出血的风险评分,并评估了华法林使用者与非使用者之间的卒中和出血风险。
我们纳入了2007年10月至2015年3月期间转为血液透析的28,620名美国透析前退伍军人队列。分别根据CHA2DS2-VASc或HAS-BLED评分确定卒中和出血风险的发生率。采用基于倾向评分的竞争风险分析来评估卒中和出血风险。
我们队列的平均年龄为77±9岁,CHA2DS2-VASc和HAS-BLED评分中位数分别为7(5,8)和3(3,4)。CHA2DS2-VASc评分增加和HAS-BLED评分增加分别预示着卒中和出血发生率增加。然而,华法林的使用似乎并未影响卒中和出血风险(卒中的p交互作用=0.84,出血的p交互作用=0.24)。在考虑死亡竞争风险时,华法林的使用与卒中风险较高(调整后的标准化风险比1.44,95%置信区间:1.23-1.69)和出血风险较高(调整后的标准化风险比1.38,95%置信区间:1.25-1.52)相关。
华法林使用者与非使用者之间的卒中和出血发生率没有差异。在考虑死亡风险后,华法林与较高的卒中和出血风险相关。