• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疫情期间政府政策的更严格程度是否会影响股票回报?来自GREF国家(一个新出现的绿色集团)的新证据。

Does more stringencies in government policies during pandemic impact stock returns? Fresh evidence from GREF countries, a new emerging green bloc.

作者信息

Gu Jianqiang, Yue Xiao-Guang, Nosheen Safia, Shi Lei

机构信息

Business School, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.

School of Sciences, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.

出版信息

Resour Policy. 2022 Jun;76:102582. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102582. Epub 2022 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102582
PMID:35125613
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8809089/
Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the impact of the government economic policies in addition to the more stringent Covid-19 policies on stock index returns of GREF countries, that is, a new economic bloc of 5 countries (Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, Russia, and China) to foster for sustainable development of the region. Using the Panel, ARDL model and data for index returns and economic and Covid-19 control policies for the period March 1, 2020-June 30, 2021, results show that Income support, workplace closure, stringency index, and cancellation of public events have a significant positive impact on the stock index returns over the long run. In contrast, school closure, restriction on public gatherings, and international travel control policies negatively impact stock returns. In comparison, Debt policies, Covid-19 testing policies, health index, and face-covering policies remain insignificant. In the short run, stringent index and face-covering policies remain positively significant. Results of the study suggest significant policy implications that can help reform economic and Covid-19 control policies and promote the region's economic growth over the long-run period.

摘要

在本文中,我们研究了政府经济政策以及更为严格的新冠疫情防控政策对“GREF国家”股指回报的影响。“GREF国家”是一个由五个国家(巴基斯坦、伊朗、土耳其、俄罗斯和中国)组成的新经济集团,旨在促进该地区的可持续发展。利用面板自回归分布滞后(ARDL)模型以及2020年3月1日至2021年6月30日期间的股指回报数据、经济政策数据和新冠疫情防控政策数据,结果表明,从长期来看,收入支持、工作场所关闭、严格指数以及公共活动取消对股指回报具有显著的正向影响。相比之下,学校关闭、公共集会限制以及国际旅行管控政策对股票回报产生负面影响。此外,债务政策、新冠病毒检测政策、健康指数以及口罩佩戴政策的影响并不显著。在短期内,严格指数和口罩佩戴政策仍具有显著的正向影响。研究结果表明了重要的政策含义,有助于改革经济政策和新冠疫情防控政策,并在长期促进该地区的经济增长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1802/8809089/067bc53b933b/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1802/8809089/4388fafabf57/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1802/8809089/067bc53b933b/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1802/8809089/4388fafabf57/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1802/8809089/067bc53b933b/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Does more stringencies in government policies during pandemic impact stock returns? Fresh evidence from GREF countries, a new emerging green bloc.疫情期间政府政策的更严格程度是否会影响股票回报?来自GREF国家(一个新出现的绿色集团)的新证据。
Resour Policy. 2022 Jun;76:102582. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102582. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
2
Economic impact of government interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: International evidence from financial markets.新冠疫情期间政府干预措施的经济影响:来自金融市场的国际证据
J Behav Exp Finance. 2020 Sep;27:100371. doi: 10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100371. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
3
COVID-19 Government restriction policy, COVID-19 vaccination and stock markets: Evidence from a global perspective.新冠疫情政府限制政策、新冠疫苗接种与股票市场:全球视角的证据
Financ Res Lett. 2023 May;53:103669. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.103669. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
4
The effects of daily growth in COVID-19 deaths, cases, and governments' response policies on stock markets of emerging economies.新冠疫情死亡人数、病例数的每日增长以及政府应对政策对新兴经济体股票市场的影响。
Res Int Bus Finance. 2022 Oct;61:101659. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101659. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
5
The impact of COVID-19 and non-pharmaceutical interventions on energy returns worldwide.新型冠状病毒肺炎及非药物干预措施对全球能源回报的影响
Sustain Cities Soc. 2021 Jul;70:102943. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102943. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
6
Do non-pharmaceutical policies in response to COVID-19 affect stock performance? Evidence from Malaysia stock market return and volatility.应对 COVID-19 的非药物政策是否会影响股票表现?来自马来西亚股票市场收益和波动性的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 31;18(1):e0277252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277252. eCollection 2023.
7
Can Stringent Government Initiatives Lead to Global Economic Recovery Rapidly during the COVID-19 Epidemic?在新冠肺炎疫情期间,严格的政府措施能否迅速引领全球经济复苏?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 12;20(6):4993. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064993.
8
Impact of government interventions on the stock market during COVID-19: a case study in Indonesia.新冠疫情期间政府干预对股票市场的影响:以印度尼西亚为例
SN Bus Econ. 2022;2(9):136. doi: 10.1007/s43546-022-00312-4. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
9
Banking sector reactions to COVID-19: The role of bank-specific factors and government policy responses.银行业对新冠疫情的反应:银行特定因素及政府政策应对的作用。
Res Int Bus Finance. 2021 Dec;58:101508. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101508. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
10
COVID-19 pandemic and capital markets: the role of government responses.新冠疫情与资本市场:政府应对措施的作用
J Bus Econ. 2023;93(1-2):11-57. doi: 10.1007/s11573-022-01103-x. Epub 2022 Jul 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of government policies in response to the first COVID-19 outbreak.政府应对首次新冠疫情政策的有效性。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Apr 13;2(4):e0000242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000242. eCollection 2022.
2
Impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on the US equity sectors: Evidence from quantile return spillovers.新冠疫情爆发对美国股票板块的影响:来自分位数回报溢出效应的证据。
Financ Innov. 2021;7(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40854-021-00228-2. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
3
Does green investment, financial development and natural resources rent limit carbon emissions? A provincial panel analysis of China.
绿色投资、金融发展和自然资源租金是否限制了碳排放?基于中国省级面板数据的分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Feb 10;755(Pt 2):142538. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142538. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
4
Impact of Covid-19 on corporate solvency and possible policy responses in the EU.新冠疫情对欧盟企业偿付能力的影响及可能的政策应对措施。
Q Rev Econ Finance. 2023 Feb;87:181-190. doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2020.09.002. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
5
COVID-19 lockdowns, stimulus packages, travel bans, and stock returns.新冠疫情封锁措施、经济刺激计划、旅行禁令与股票回报
Financ Res Lett. 2021 Jan;38:101732. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101732. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
6
Price reaction, volatility timing and funds' performance during Covid-19.新冠疫情期间的价格反应、波动时机与基金表现。
Financ Res Lett. 2020 Oct;36:101657. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101657. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
7
Financial markets under the global pandemic of COVID-19.新冠疫情全球大流行下的金融市场。
Financ Res Lett. 2020 Oct;36:101528. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101528. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
8
Economic impact of government interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: International evidence from financial markets.新冠疫情期间政府干预措施的经济影响:来自金融市场的国际证据
J Behav Exp Finance. 2020 Sep;27:100371. doi: 10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100371. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
9
Financial implications of fourth industrial revolution: Can bitcoin improve prospects of energy investment?第四次工业革命的财务影响:比特币能否改善能源投资前景?
Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2020 Sep;158:120178. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120178. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
10
Death and contagious infectious diseases: Impact of the COVID-19 virus on stock market returns.死亡与传染性疾病:新冠病毒对股市回报的影响。
J Behav Exp Finance. 2020 Sep;27:100326. doi: 10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100326. Epub 2020 Apr 8.