• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

银行业对新冠疫情的反应:银行特定因素及政府政策应对的作用。

Banking sector reactions to COVID-19: The role of bank-specific factors and government policy responses.

作者信息

Demir Ender, Danisman Gamze Ozturk

机构信息

Department of Business Administration, School of Social Sciences, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.

Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Social Sciences, Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Res Int Bus Finance. 2021 Dec;58:101508. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101508. Epub 2021 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101508
PMID:36404994
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9666082/
Abstract

This paper examines the impact of bank-specific factors and variations in the context of stringency of government policy responses on bank stock returns because of the COVID-19 pandemic. A sample of 1,927 publicly listed banks from 110 countries is used for the period of the first major wave of COVID-19, that is, January to May 2020. Our findings indicate that stock returns of banks with higher capitalization and deposits, more diversification, lower non-performing loans, and larger size are more resilient to the pandemic. While banks' environment and governance scores do not have a significant impact, higher social and corporate social responsibility strategy scores intensify the negative stock price reaction to COVID-19. We further observe that the pandemic-induced reduction in bank stock prices is mitigated as the strictness of government policy responses increases, mainly through economic responses such as income support, debt and contract relief, and fiscal measures from governments.

摘要

本文考察了特定银行因素以及政府政策应对严格程度背景下的变化对因新冠疫情导致的银行股票回报的影响。选取了来自110个国家的1927家公开上市银行作为样本,研究时间段为新冠疫情第一波高峰期,即2020年1月至5月。我们的研究结果表明,资本充足率和存款较高、多元化程度更高、不良贷款较低且规模较大的银行,其股票回报对疫情的抵御能力更强。虽然银行的环境和治理得分没有显著影响,但较高的社会和企业社会责任战略得分会加剧股票价格对新冠疫情的负面反应。我们进一步观察到,随着政府政策应对措施的严格程度提高,疫情导致的银行股价下跌得到缓解,这主要是通过政府的收入支持、债务和合同减免以及财政措施等经济应对手段实现的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c98c/9666082/e2fc860eb068/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c98c/9666082/ea5c62fdd8b8/ga1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c98c/9666082/e2fc860eb068/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c98c/9666082/ea5c62fdd8b8/ga1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c98c/9666082/e2fc860eb068/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Banking sector reactions to COVID-19: The role of bank-specific factors and government policy responses.银行业对新冠疫情的反应:银行特定因素及政府政策应对的作用。
Res Int Bus Finance. 2021 Dec;58:101508. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101508. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
2
Impact of corporate governance and CEO remuneration on bank capitalization strategies and payout decision in income shocks period.公司治理与首席执行官薪酬对收入冲击时期银行资本策略及派息决策的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 29;13:901868. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901868. eCollection 2022.
3
COVID-19 and bank performance in dual-banking countries: an empirical analysis.双重银行体系国家中的新冠疫情与银行绩效:实证分析
J Bus Econ. 2022;92(9):1511-1557. doi: 10.1007/s11573-022-01093-w. Epub 2022 May 5.
4
Banking sector performance during the COVID-19 crisis.新冠疫情危机期间银行业的表现。
J Bank Financ. 2021 Dec;133:106305. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106305. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
5
ESG Performance and Stock Price Volatility in Public Health Crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 Pandemic.公共卫生危机中的 ESG 绩效与股价波动性:来自 COVID-19 大流行的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 25;19(1):202. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010202.
6
Banks' credit risk, systematic determinants and specific factors: recent evidence from emerging markets.银行的信用风险、系统性决定因素和特定因素:来自新兴市场的最新证据。
Heliyon. 2022 Feb 15;8(2):e08960. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08960. eCollection 2022 Feb.
7
Does environmental, social, and governance performance mitigate earnings management practices? Evidence from US commercial banks.环境、社会和治理绩效是否能减轻盈利管理行为?来自美国商业银行的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(8):20386-20401. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23616-2. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
8
Bank stock performance during the COVID-19 crisis: does efficiency explain why Islamic banks fared relatively better?新冠疫情危机期间银行股的表现:效率能否解释伊斯兰银行表现相对较好的原因?
Ann Oper Res. 2022 Mar 17:1-39. doi: 10.1007/s10479-022-04600-y.
9
Corporate sustainability performance, stock returns, and ESG indicators: fresh insights from EU member states.企业可持续发展绩效、股票回报与 ESG 指标:来自欧盟成员国的新视角。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(58):87680-87691. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20789-8. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
10
The Effect of ESG performance on the stock market during the COVID-19 Pandemic - Evidence from Japan.新冠疫情期间环境、社会和治理(ESG)绩效对日本股票市场的影响——来自日本的证据
Econ Anal Policy. 2023 Jun 28. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2023.06.038.

引用本文的文献

1
Coronavirus pandemic impact on bank performance.冠状病毒大流行对银行绩效的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 6;13:1014009. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1014009. eCollection 2022.
2
COVID-19 pandemic and debt financing by firms: Unravelling the channels.新冠疫情与企业债务融资:厘清相关渠道
Econ Model. 2022 Sep;114:105929. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105929. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
3
How to calm down the markets? The effects of COVID-19 economic policy responses on financial market uncertainty.如何稳定市场?新冠疫情经济政策应对措施对金融市场不确定性的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
The contagion effects of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from gold and cryptocurrencies.新冠疫情的传染效应:来自黄金和加密货币的证据。
Financ Res Lett. 2020 Jul;35:101554. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101554. Epub 2020 May 14.
2
COVID-19 pandemic, oil prices, stock market, geopolitical risk and policy uncertainty nexus in the US economy: Fresh evidence from the wavelet-based approach.美国经济中新冠疫情、油价、股市、地缘政治风险与政策不确定性之间的联系:基于小波方法的新证据
Int Rev Financ Anal. 2020 Jul;70:101496. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101496. Epub 2020 May 15.
3
Co-movement of COVID-19 and Bitcoin: Evidence from wavelet coherence analysis.
Res Int Bus Finance. 2022 Apr;60:101613. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101613. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
新冠疫情与比特币的共同变动:来自小波相干分析的证据。
Financ Res Lett. 2021 Jan;38:101625. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101625. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
4
COVID-19, firm exposure, and firm value: A tale of two lockdowns.新冠疫情、企业风险暴露与企业价值:两次封锁的故事
China Econ Rev. 2022 Feb;71:101721. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101721. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
5
Volatility in International Sovereign Bond Markets: The role of government policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.国际主权债券市场的波动:政府应对新冠疫情政策的作用。
Financ Res Lett. 2021 Nov;43:102011. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2021.102011. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
6
Corporate bond market reactions to quantitative easing during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间企业债券市场对量化宽松政策的反应。
J Bank Financ. 2021 Dec;133:106153. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106153. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
7
The impact of COVID-19 on the stock market crash risk in China.新冠疫情对中国股市崩盘风险的影响。
Res Int Bus Finance. 2021 Oct;57:101419. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101419. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
8
Corporate immunity to the COVID-19 pandemic.企业对新冠疫情的豁免权。
J financ econ. 2021 Aug;141(2):802-830. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
9
Risk contagion of COVID-19 in Japanese firms: A network approach.日本企业中新冠疫情的风险传染:一种网络分析方法。
Res Int Bus Finance. 2021 Dec;58:101491. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101491. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
10
Corporate Social Responsibility Amid Social Distancing During the COVID-19 Crisis: BRICS vs. OECD Countries.新冠疫情危机期间保持社交距离情况下的企业社会责任:金砖国家与经合组织国家对比
Res Int Bus Finance. 2021 Jan;55:101315. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101315. Epub 2020 Aug 18.