Suppr超能文献

在进行结肠-结肠或结肠-直肠吻合术前评估腹主动脉钙化:一项病例对照研究。

Assessing abdominal aortic calcifications before performing colocolic or colorectal anastomoses: A case-control study.

作者信息

Deguelte Sophie, Besson Romain, Job Louis, Hoeffel Christine, Jolly Damien, Kianmanesh Reza

机构信息

Department of Digestive Surgery, Robert Debré Hospital, Reims University Hospital, Reims, France.

Reims Medical School, EA 3797, 51095 Reims, France; Reims Medical School, University of Champagne Ardennes, Reims, France.

出版信息

J Res Med Sci. 2021 Nov 29;26:110. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_874_19. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preoperative evaluation needs objective measurement of the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL). This study aimed to determine if cardiovascular disease, evaluated by abdominal aortic calcification (AAC), was associated with AL after colorectal anastomoses. We conducted a retrospective case-control study on patients who underwent colorectal anastomosis between 2012 and 2016 at Reims University Hospital (France). Abdominal aortic calcification was the main variable of measurement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed all patients who had a left-sided colocolic or a colorectal anastomosis, all patients with AL were cases; 2 controls, or 3 when possible, without AL were randomly selected and matched by operation type, pathology, and age. For multivariate analysis, 2 logistic regression models were tested, the first one used the calcification rate as a continuous variable and the second one used the calcification rate ≥ 5% as a qualitative variable.

RESULTS

Forty-five cases and 116 controls were included. In univariate analysis, the calcification rate and the percentage of patients with a calcification rate ≥5% were significantly higher in cases than in control groups (4.4 ± 5.5% vs. 2.5 ± 5.2%, odds ratio [OR] =1.6 95% CI: 1.1-2.5; = 22, 49% and = 34.3 3%, OR = 2.8 95% CI: 1.2-6.2). In multivariate models, calcification rate as a continuous variable and calcification rate ≥5% as qualitative variable were independent significant risk factors for AL (respectively, aOR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1-3, = 0.01; aOR = 3.2; 95% CI: 1.4-7.55, < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

AAC ≥5% should alert on a higher risk of AL and should lead to discussion about the decision of performing an anastomosis.

摘要

背景

术前评估需要客观测量吻合口漏(AL)的风险。本研究旨在确定通过腹主动脉钙化(AAC)评估的心血管疾病是否与结直肠吻合术后的AL相关。我们对2012年至2016年在法国兰斯大学医院接受结直肠吻合术的患者进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究。腹主动脉钙化是主要测量变量。

材料与方法

我们回顾了所有进行左侧结肠结肠或结直肠吻合术的患者,所有发生AL的患者为病例组;随机选择2名对照,若可能则选3名,无AL的对照按手术类型、病理和年龄进行匹配。对于多变量分析,测试了2个逻辑回归模型,第一个模型将钙化率作为连续变量,第二个模型将钙化率≥5%作为定性变量。

结果

纳入45例病例和116例对照。单变量分析中,病例组的钙化率和钙化率≥5%的患者百分比显著高于对照组(4.4±5.5%对2.5±5.2%,比值比[OR]=1.6,95%可信区间:1.1 - 2.5;=22,49%和=34.3 3%,OR = 2.8,95%可信区间:1.2 - 6.2)。在多变量模型中,钙化率作为连续变量和钙化率≥5%作为定性变量均是AL的独立显著危险因素(分别为调整后OR = 1.8;95%可信区间:1.1 - 3,=0.01;调整后OR = 3.2;95%可信区间:1.4 - 7.55,<0.01)。

结论

AAC≥5%应提示AL风险较高,并应引发关于进行吻合术决策的讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3101/8765517/f1bd7f7d77db/JRMS-26-110-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验