Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Surgery, St. John of God Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5318-5326. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5611-0. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
Anastomotic leakage following colorectal resection remains one of the most significant complications with relevant morbidity and mortality. There is evidence that a higher number of stapler firings for rectal division can affect the leak rate in double stapling anastomosis. However, there are no data concerning compression anastomosis. We present our institutional experience addressing this issue.
This is a retrospective review of a prospective institutional database of patients undergoing colonic and rectal resection for benign and malignant indications between January 2008 and December 2014 at the surgical department of the St. John of God Hospital, Vienna. Inclusion criteria were rectal division with linear stapling devices and construction of anastomosis to the rectal stump using a circular stapler or compression device.
Three hundred eighty two (196 female; 51.3%) patients were included. Mean age was 65.8 years (range: 18-95) Indications for the operation included diverticular disease (44.8%), colorectal carcinoma (51.6%), inflammatory bowel disease (1.8%), and adenoma (1.8%). A laparoscopic approach was employed in 334 cases (87.4%); in 170 patients (44.9%), a compression anastomosis was created. One, two, and three or more stapler cartridges were used for rectal division in 58.4, 33.5, and 8.1%, respectively. Male gender, neoadjuvant therapy, rectal cancer as an underlying disease, laparoscopic surgical approach, and duration of operation longer than 200 min are leading causes for the usage of more than one stapler cartridge. Overall leak rate was 4.7% (18/382). The only factor associated with the occurrence of leakage was the use of three or more stapler cartridges for the closure of the rectal stump (p = 0.002).
Our data support that multiple stapler firings for rectal division following colorectal resection has a major impact on anastomotic leak rate. Especially in laparoscopic surgery efforts should be made to minimize the number of stapler cartridges used.
结直肠切除术后吻合口漏仍然是最严重的并发症之一,具有相关的发病率和死亡率。有证据表明,直肠分离时吻合器击发次数的增加会影响双吻合器吻合术的漏率。然而,关于压缩吻合术尚无相关数据。我们介绍了我们在这方面的机构经验。
这是对维也纳圣约翰上帝医院普外科 2008 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月期间因良性和恶性疾病接受结肠和直肠切除术的患者的前瞻性机构数据库的回顾性分析。纳入标准为直肠采用线性吻合器切割,直肠残端采用圆形吻合器或压缩器构建吻合。
共纳入 382 例患者(女性 196 例,占 51.3%;年龄 18-95 岁,平均 65.8 岁)。手术指征包括憩室病(44.8%)、结直肠癌(51.6%)、炎症性肠病(1.8%)和腺瘤(1.8%)。334 例(87.4%)采用腹腔镜方法;170 例(44.9%)行压迫吻合术。直肠分离采用 1 个、2 个和 3 个或更多吻合器切割的分别占 58.4%、33.5%和 8.1%。男性、新辅助治疗、直肠癌为基础疾病、腹腔镜手术和手术时间超过 200 分钟是使用超过 1 个吻合器切割的主要原因。总体漏率为 4.7%(18/382)。唯一与漏发生相关的因素是使用 3 个或更多吻合器切割器来封闭直肠残端(p=0.002)。
我们的数据支持结直肠切除术后直肠分离时多次吻合器击发对吻合口漏率有重大影响。特别是在腹腔镜手术中,应努力减少吻合器切割器的使用次数。