Suppr超能文献

癌症特异性质量措施综述,以促进避免低价值医疗。

Review of Cancer-Specific Quality Measures Promoting the Avoidance of Low-Value Care.

机构信息

University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Jun;29(6):3750-3762. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-11303-4. Epub 2022 Feb 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With rising healthcare costs and campaigns aimed at avoiding low-value care, reducing cancer overtreatment has emerged as an important measure of cancer care quality. The extent to which avoidance of low-value care has been incorporated in cancer-specific quality measures is unknown. We aimed to identify and characterize cancer quality measures that promote the avoidance of low-value care, and identify gaps that may guide future measure development.

METHODS

We systematically identified cancer-specific quality measures from leading quality measure organizations [e.g., National Quality Forum (NQF), National Quality Measures Clearinghouse (NQMC)]. We reviewed measures promoting the avoidance of low-value cancer care and subclassified them into disease site- or non-disease site-specific categories and the phase of care they targeted.

RESULTS

We reviewed 313 quality measures from six organizations. Of these, 18% (n = 55) focused on avoidance of low-value care. Quality measures focused on end-of-life care were most likely to focus on low-value care [n = 13 (50%)], followed by breast [n = 12 (18%)], lung [n = 9 (31%)], colon [n = 8 (20%)], prostate [n = 5 (38%)], general cancer care [n = 4 (3%)], symptoms and toxicities [n = 2 (40%)], and palliative cancer care [n = 2 (11%)] measures. The phases of care quality measures targeted included low-value screening [n = 5 (9%)], diagnostic testing and staging [n = 7 (13%)], treatment [n = 19 (34%)], surveillance [n = 6 (11%)], and clinical outcomes [n = 18 (33%)]. All categories had a treatment-specific quality measure, but no category had a representative measure for every phase of care.

DISCUSSION

A minority of cancer quality measures are aimed at avoiding low-value care, and multiple evidence-based recommendations targeting low-value care have not been incorporated.

摘要

背景

随着医疗保健成本的上升和旨在避免低价值医疗的运动,减少癌症过度治疗已成为癌症护理质量的重要衡量标准。避免低价值医疗的程度已纳入癌症特定质量措施尚不清楚。我们旨在确定和描述促进避免低价值护理的癌症质量措施,并确定可能指导未来措施发展的差距。

方法

我们从主要质量衡量组织(如国家质量论坛(NQF)、国家质量衡量信息交换中心(NQMC))系统地确定了癌症特定质量措施。我们审查了促进避免低价值癌症护理的措施,并将其分为疾病部位或非疾病部位特定类别以及他们针对的护理阶段。

结果

我们审查了来自六个组织的 313 项质量措施。其中,18%(n=55)专注于避免低价值护理。专注于临终关怀的质量措施最有可能关注低价值护理[n=13(50%)],其次是乳腺癌[n=12(18%)]、肺癌[n=9(31%)]、结肠癌[n=8(20%)]、前列腺癌[n=5(38%)]、一般癌症护理[n=4(3%)]、症状和毒性[n=2(40%)]和姑息性癌症护理[n=2(11%)]措施。质量措施针对的护理阶段包括低价值筛查[n=5(9%)]、诊断性测试和分期[n=7(13%)]、治疗[n=19(34%)]、监测[n=6(11%)]和临床结果[n=18(33%)]。所有类别都有治疗特定的质量措施,但没有一个类别针对每个护理阶段都有代表性的措施。

讨论

少数癌症质量措施旨在避免低价值护理,并且许多针对低价值护理的循证建议尚未纳入。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验