• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习模型在个体化乳房皮瓣坏死风险评估中的开发和评估。

Development and Assessment of Machine Learning Models for Individualized Risk Assessment of Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis.

机构信息

Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2023 Jul 1;278(1):e123-e130. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005386. Epub 2022 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000005386
PMID:35129476
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop, validate, and evaluate ML algorithms for predicting MSFN.

BACKGROUND

MSFN is a devastating complication that causes significant distress to patients and physicians by prolonging recovery time, compromising surgical outcomes, and delaying adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

We conducted comprehensive review of all consecutive patients who underwent mastectomy and immediate implant-based reconstruction from January 2018 to December 2019. Nine supervised ML algorithms were developed to predict MSFN. Patient data were partitioned into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets.

RESULTS

We identified 694 mastectomies with immediate implant-based reconstruction in 481 patients. The patients had a mean age of 50 ± 11.5 years, years, a mean body mass index of 26.7 ± 4.8 kg/m 2 , and a median follow-up time of 16.1 (range, 11.9-23.2) months. MSFN developed in 6% (n = 40) of patients. The random forest model demonstrated the best discriminatory performance (area under curve, 0.70), achieved a mean accuracy of 89% (95% confidence interval, 83-94), and identified 10 predictors of MSFN. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that ML models have a superior net benefit regardless of the probability threshold. Higher body mass index, older age, hypertension, subpectoral device placement, nipple-sparing mastectomy, axillary nodal dissection, and no acellular dermal matrix use were all independently associated with a higher risk of MSFN.

CONCLUSIONS

ML algorithms trained on readily available perioperative clinical data can accurately predict the occurrence of MSFN and aid in individualized patient counseling, preoperative optimization, and surgical planning to reduce the risk of this devastating complication.

摘要

目的

开发、验证和评估用于预测 MSFN 的机器学习算法。

背景

MSFN 是一种破坏性的并发症,通过延长恢复时间、影响手术结果和延迟辅助治疗,给患者和医生带来了极大的痛苦。

方法

我们对 2018 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间所有接受乳房切除术和即刻基于植入物的重建的连续患者进行了全面回顾。开发了 9 种监督机器学习算法来预测 MSFN。患者数据被分为训练集(80%)和测试集(20%)。

结果

我们确定了 481 名患者中的 694 例乳房切除术和即刻基于植入物的重建。患者的平均年龄为 50 ± 11.5 岁,平均 BMI 为 26.7 ± 4.8kg/m 2 ,中位随访时间为 16.1(范围为 11.9-23.2)个月。6%(n=40)的患者发生了 MSFN。随机森林模型表现出最佳的区分性能(曲线下面积为 0.70),达到了 89%的平均准确率(95%置信区间为 83-94),并确定了 10 个 MSFN 的预测因子。决策曲线分析表明,无论概率阈值如何,机器学习模型都具有更高的净收益。较高的 BMI、年龄较大、高血压、胸肌下器械放置、保留乳头的乳房切除术、腋窝淋巴结清扫术和不使用脱细胞真皮基质均与更高的 MSFN 风险独立相关。

结论

基于易于获得的围手术期临床数据训练的机器学习算法可以准确预测 MSFN 的发生,并有助于个体化患者咨询、术前优化和手术规划,以降低这种破坏性并发症的风险。

相似文献

1
Development and Assessment of Machine Learning Models for Individualized Risk Assessment of Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis.机器学习模型在个体化乳房皮瓣坏死风险评估中的开发和评估。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jul 1;278(1):e123-e130. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005386. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
2
Indocyanine green angiography for preventing postoperative mastectomy skin flap necrosis in immediate breast reconstruction.吲哚菁绿血管造影术在即刻乳房重建中预防乳房切除术后皮瓣坏死的应用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 22;4(4):CD013280. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013280.pub2.
3
Decoding the Mastectomy SKIN Score: An Evaluation of Its Predictive Performance in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.解读乳房切除术皮肤评分:在即刻乳房重建中的预测性能评估。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Jun 1;153(6):1073e-1079e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010817. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
4
Evaluating Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis in the Extended Breast Reconstruction Risk Assessment Score for 1-Year Prediction of Prosthetic Reconstruction Outcomes.评估扩展乳房重建风险评估评分中的乳房皮瓣坏死,以预测 1 年假体重建结局。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Jul;227(1):96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 17.
5
The Impact of Preoperative Breast Volume on Development of Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.术前乳房体积对即刻乳房重建中乳房皮瓣坏死发展的影响。
Ann Plast Surg. 2022 Jun 1;88(5 Suppl 5):S403-S409. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003164.
6
Ischemic Complications After Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Implant-based Reconstruction: A Critical Analysis.双侧乳头保留乳房切除术和基于植入物的重建术后的缺血性并发症:一项批判性分析。
Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Jun 1;86(6S Suppl 5):S526-S531. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002703.
7
Predicting Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis: A Systematic Review of Preoperative and Intraoperative Assessment Techniques.预测乳房切除术皮瓣坏死:术前和术中评估技术的系统评价。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2023 Apr;23(3):249-254. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.12.021. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
8
Introducing the SKIN score: a validated scoring system to assess severity of mastectomy skin flap necrosis.介绍SKIN评分:一种经过验证的用于评估乳房切除皮瓣坏死严重程度的评分系统。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep;22(9):2925-32. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4409-3. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
9
Skin Reducing Mastectomy and Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction: A Critical Analysis.皮肤缩减乳房切除术及即刻组织扩张器重建术:一项批判性分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2022 May 1;88(5):485-489. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003036. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
10
The lateral inframammary fold incision for nipple-sparing mastectomy: outcomes from over 50 immediate implant-based breast reconstructions.经乳晕下皱襞侧方切口行保留乳头的乳房切除术:50 余例即刻乳房假体植入再造术的结果。
Breast J. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):31-40. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12043. Epub 2012 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk prediction models for complications after flap repair surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.皮瓣修复术后并发症的风险预测模型:一项系统评价与Meta分析
BMC Surg. 2025 Aug 27;25(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03072-8.
2
Development and validation of a Nomogram to predict postoperative flap necrosis risk in breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.预测改良根治性乳房切除术乳腺癌患者术后皮瓣坏死风险的列线图的开发与验证
Am J Cancer Res. 2025 Mar 15;15(3):1291-1306. doi: 10.62347/DYFF7059. eCollection 2025.
3
The clinical application of artificial intelligence in cancer precision treatment.
人工智能在癌症精准治疗中的临床应用。
J Transl Med. 2025 Jan 27;23(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06139-5.
4
A feasibility study assessing quantitative indocyanine green angiographic predictors of reconstructive complications following nipple-sparing mastectomy.一项评估保留乳头乳房切除术后重建并发症的定量吲哚菁绿血管造影预测指标的可行性研究。
JPRAS Open. 2024 Jan 26;40:32-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.01.012. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Explainable artificial intelligence prediction-based model in laparoscopic liver surgery for segments 7 and 8: an international multicenter study.基于可解释人工智能预测的腹腔镜肝 7、8 段切除术模型:一项国际多中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2411-2422. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10681-6. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
6
Frail but Resilient: Frailty in Autologous Breast Reconstruction is Associated with Worse Surgical Outcomes but Equivalent Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes.虚弱但有韧性:自体乳房重建中的脆弱与更差的手术结果相关,但与长期的患者报告结果相当。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jan;31(1):659-671. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14412-4. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
7
Exploring the Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: Insights from a Conversation with ChatGPT.探索人工智能在手术中的潜力:与ChatGPT对话的见解
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul;30(7):3875-3878. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13347-0. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
8
Predicting Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Surgery Using Machine Learning.运用机器学习预测术后患者报告结局
Am Surg. 2023 Jan;89(1):31-35. doi: 10.1177/00031348221109478. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
9
A Surgeon's Guide to Artificial Intelligence-Driven Predictive Models.外科医生人工智能驱动的预测模型指南
Am Surg. 2023 Jan;89(1):11-19. doi: 10.1177/00031348221103648. Epub 2022 May 19.
10
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Prediction of Surgical Complications: Current State, Applications, and Implications.人工智能和机器学习在预测手术并发症中的应用:现状、应用和意义。
Am Surg. 2023 Jan;89(1):25-30. doi: 10.1177/00031348221101488. Epub 2022 May 13.