1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.
2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Feb;20(2):151-159. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7065.
Active surveillance (AS) is a safe treatment option for men with low-risk, localized prostate cancer. However, the safety of AS for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer remains unclear.
We identified men with NCCN-classified low-risk and favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer diagnosed between 2001 and 2015 and initially managed with AS in the Veterans Health Administration. We analyzed progression to definitive treatment, metastasis, prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and all-cause mortality using cumulative incidences and multivariable competing-risks regression.
The cohort included 9,733 men, of whom 1,007 (10.3%) had intermediate-risk disease (773 [76.8%] favorable, 234 [23.2%] unfavorable), followed for a median of 7.6 years. The 10-year cumulative incidence of metastasis was significantly higher for patients with favorable (9.6%; 95% CI, 7.1%-12.5%; P<.001) and unfavorable intermediate-risk disease (19.2%; 95% CI, 13.4%-25.9%; P<.001) than for those with low-risk disease (1.5%; 95% CI, 1.2%-1.9%). The 10-year cumulative incidence of PCSM was also significantly higher for patients with favorable (3.7%; 95% CI, 2.3%-5.7%; P<.001) and unfavorable intermediate-risk disease (11.8%; 95% CI, 6.8%-18.4%; P<.001) than for those with low-risk disease (1.1%; 95% CI, 0.8%-1.4%). In multivariable competing-risks regression, favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk patients had significantly increased risks of metastasis and PCSM compared with low-risk patients (all P<.001).
Compared with low-risk patients, those with favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer managed with AS are at increased risk of metastasis and PCSM. AS may be an appropriate option for carefully selected patients with favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer, though identification of appropriate candidates and AS protocols should be tested in future prospective studies.
主动监测(AS)是治疗低危、局限性前列腺癌患者的安全治疗选择。然而,对于中危前列腺癌患者,AS 的安全性尚不清楚。
我们在退伍军人健康管理局(VA)中确定了 2001 年至 2015 年间被诊断为 NCCN 分类的低危和有利与不利的中危前列腺癌并最初接受 AS 治疗的男性患者。我们使用累积发生率和多变量竞争风险回归分析了向确定性治疗、转移、前列腺癌特异性死亡率(PCSM)和全因死亡率的进展情况。
该队列包括 9733 名男性患者,其中 1007 名(10.3%)患有中危疾病(773 名[76.8%]为有利,234 名[23.2%]为不利),中位随访时间为 7.6 年。具有有利(9.6%;95%CI,7.1%-12.5%;P<.001)和不利中间风险疾病(19.2%;95%CI,13.4%-25.9%;P<.001)的患者的 10 年转移累积发生率显著高于低危疾病患者(1.5%;95%CI,1.2%-1.9%)。具有有利(3.7%;95%CI,2.3%-5.7%;P<.001)和不利中间风险疾病(11.8%;95%CI,6.8%-18.4%;P<.001)的患者的 10 年 PCSM 累积发生率也显著高于低危疾病患者(1.1%;95%CI,0.8%-1.4%)。在多变量竞争风险回归中,与低危患者相比,有利和不利中间风险患者转移和 PCSM 的风险显著增加(均 P<.001)。
与低危患者相比,接受 AS 治疗的具有有利和不利中间风险前列腺癌的患者转移和 PCSM 的风险增加。AS 可能是具有有利中间风险前列腺癌的精心挑选的患者的合适选择,尽管应在未来的前瞻性研究中检验合适患者的确定和 AS 方案。