Suppr超能文献

创伤性骨盆 X 射线:并非所有骨盆骨折都一样。

The trauma pelvic X-ray: Not all pelvic fractures are created equally.

机构信息

Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2022 Jul;224(1 Pt B):489-493. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.01.009. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the role of the initial pelvic X-ray in identifying significant pelvic fractures, which could result in changes in the management of the patient.

METHODS

Patients admitted to a level I trauma center (2010-2019) with a severe blunt pelvic fracture (AIS ≥3) were identified. Included in the analysis were patients who underwent emergency department pelvic X-ray followed by CT scan. A control group of patients without pelvic fractures was also included in the study. All investigations were reviewed by a blinded attending trauma radiologist. Pelvic X-ray findings and CT scan reports were compared according to the specific pelvic fracture location, and severity.

RESULTS

Overall, pelvic X-ray was diagnosed 252 of the 285 pelvic fractures (sensitivity 88.4%) and wrongly diagnosed a facture in 3 of 97 patients without a fracture (specificity 96.9%). In 29/184 (15.8%) of patients with pelvic fracture AIS 3, the pelvic X-ray was read as normal, missing the fracture, compared with 4/101 (4.0%) in the AIS 4/5 group (p = 0.003). Pelvic X-ray had the lowest sensitivity in ischial (10.7%), iliac (28.7%), acetabular (42.4%), and sacral fractures (49.1%) and was best for detecting symphysis diastasis (89.8%).

CONCLUSION

Pelvic X-ray is useful in identifying pubic symphysis diastasis. However, it misses or underestimates a significant number of fractures. CT scan evaluation should be performed in patients with a suspicious mechanism or clinical suspicion of pelvic fracture.

摘要

背景

本研究的主要目的是评估初始骨盆 X 射线在识别可能导致患者治疗方式改变的显著骨盆骨折中的作用。

方法

确定 2010 年至 2019 年期间因严重钝性骨盆骨折(AIS≥3)入住一级创伤中心的患者。分析包括接受急诊室骨盆 X 射线检查后进行 CT 扫描的患者。还纳入了无骨盆骨折的对照组患者。所有检查均由一位盲法创伤放射科医生进行审查。根据特定骨盆骨折部位和严重程度比较骨盆 X 射线检查结果和 CT 扫描报告。

结果

总体而言,骨盆 X 射线诊断出 285 例骨盆骨折中的 252 例(敏感性 88.4%),在 97 例无骨折患者中误诊断 3 例骨折(特异性 96.9%)。在 29/184(15.8%)骨盆骨折 AIS 3 的患者中,骨盆 X 射线被读为正常,漏诊骨折,而在 AIS 4/5 组的 4/101(4.0%)患者中(p=0.003)。骨盆 X 射线对坐骨(10.7%)、髂骨(28.7%)、髋臼(42.4%)和骶骨骨折(49.1%)的敏感性最低,对耻骨联合分离的敏感性最高(89.8%)。

结论

骨盆 X 射线在识别耻骨联合分离方面是有用的。然而,它会漏诊或低估大量骨折。对于可疑机制或临床怀疑骨盆骨折的患者,应进行 CT 扫描评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验