Department of Trauma Surgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Department of Traumatology, Gachon University College of Medicine, 38-13, Dokjeom-ro 3beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 21565, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 4;14(1):20548. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71654-2.
High-energy impacts, like vehicle crashes or falls, can lead to pelvic ring injuries. Rapid diagnosis and treatment are crucial due to the risks of severe bleeding and organ damage. Pelvic radiography promptly assesses fracture extent and location, but struggles to diagnose bleeding. The AO/OTA classification system grades pelvic instability, but its complexity limits its use in emergency settings. This study develops and evaluates a deep learning algorithm to classify pelvic fractures on radiographs per the AO/OTA system. Pelvic radiographs of 773 patients with pelvic fractures and 167 patients without pelvic fractures were retrospectively analyzed at a single center. Pelvic fractures were classified into types A, B, and C using medical records categorized by an orthopedic surgeon according to the AO/OTA classification system. Accuracy, Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), and F1 score were measured to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the deep learning algorithms. The segmentation model showed high performance with 0.98 accuracy and 0.96-0.97 DSC. The AO/OTA classification model demonstrated effective performance with a 0.47-0.80 F1 score and 0.69-0.88 accuracy. Additionally, the classification model had a macro average of 0.77-0.94. Performance evaluation of the models showed relatively favorable results, which can aid in early classification of pelvic fractures.
高能冲击,如车辆碰撞或坠落,可导致骨盆环损伤。由于严重出血和器官损伤的风险,快速诊断和治疗至关重要。骨盆 X 线摄影可迅速评估骨折程度和位置,但难以诊断出血。AO/OTA 分类系统对骨盆不稳定进行分级,但由于其复杂性,限制了其在紧急情况下的应用。本研究开发并评估了一种深度学习算法,用于根据 AO/OTA 系统对 X 光片上的骨盆骨折进行分类。在一个单中心回顾性分析了 773 例骨盆骨折患者和 167 例无骨盆骨折患者的骨盆 X 光片。根据 AO/OTA 分类系统,由骨科医生根据病历对骨盆骨折进行分类为 A、B 和 C 型。使用准确性、Dice 相似系数(DSC)和 F1 分数来评估深度学习算法的诊断性能。分割模型表现出较高的性能,准确性为 0.98,DSC 为 0.96-0.97。AO/OTA 分类模型表现出有效的性能,F1 分数为 0.47-0.80,准确性为 0.69-0.88。此外,分类模型的宏平均为 0.77-0.94。模型的性能评估显示出相对较好的结果,这有助于骨盆骨折的早期分类。